Category talk:Adventurers - Revision history

GS4-KEIOS: 6 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:41:05Z

6 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:41, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 08:50, 15 January 2007

2007-01-15T08:50:06Z

← Older revision

Revision as of 03:50, 15 January 2007

Maintenance script at 08:50, 15 January 2007

2007-01-15T08:50:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:50, 15 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive, I don't understand the logic in having a listing of adventurers with most of the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? Just an honest question here, and no offense meant to anyone. [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)		I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive, I don't understand the logic in having a listing of adventurers with most of the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? Just an honest question here, and no offense meant to anyone. [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)
	:I actually have covered this topic with Oliver, who, if I get this wrong, can gladly step in and correct me. He told me he'd like for Krakiipedia to become an archive and source of information for all things Gemstone, including player characters. (Its the same reason why Gemstone related writing, such as poetry and short stories are on KP) In one way, having the PCs here will allow people to at least walk down memory lane and at most, learn more about some of the individuals who played a role in historic events. As with any article, more content is desired, and hopefully those who have little said about them will one day have a lot more. I suppose more importantly, there really isn't a "notability" requirement for articles on Krakiipedia. They just need to be related to Gemstone. Regardless, I believe its a good idea if only to do that memory lane thing. :) [[User:REBELAT\|Rail]] 21:52, 14 January 2007 (EST)		:I actually have covered this topic with Oliver, who, if I get this wrong, can gladly step in and correct me. He told me he'd like for Krakiipedia to become an archive and source of information for all things Gemstone, including player characters. (Its the same reason why Gemstone related writing, such as poetry and short stories are on KP) In one way, having the PCs here will allow people to at least walk down memory lane and at most, learn more about some of the individuals who played a role in historic events. As with any article, more content is desired, and hopefully those who have little said about them will one day have a lot more. I suppose more importantly, there really isn't a "notability" requirement for articles on Krakiipedia. They just need to be related to Gemstone. Regardless, I believe its a good idea if only to do that memory lane thing. :) [[User:REBELAT\|Rail]] 21:52, 14 January 2007 (EST)
			:: Rail summed it up fairly well. In general, I don't believe there is a 'good' or 'bad' use of the wiki. If it has to do with GemStone IV, then it has a place here. For myself, personally, the interest is more in the world and the history than the mechanics of the game. However, I recognize that a central location for all things related to mechanics is not only useful in general to the GemStome community, but also some people's cup of tea when it comes to these sorts of projects. In any case, I firmly believe that the adventurers of GemStone belong with the history of the game and Elanthia. Some have left their mark, and significant ones at that. It should be noted somewhere. :) [[User:Anshou\|Oliver]] <sup>[[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]</sup> 03:50, 15 January 2007 (EST)

Maintenance script at 02:52, 15 January 2007

2007-01-15T02:52:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 14 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive, I don't understand the logic in having a listing of adventurers with most of the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? Just an honest question here, and no offense meant to anyone. [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)		I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive, I don't understand the logic in having a listing of adventurers with most of the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? Just an honest question here, and no offense meant to anyone. [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)
			:I actually have covered this topic with Oliver, who, if I get this wrong, can gladly step in and correct me. He told me he'd like for Krakiipedia to become an archive and source of information for all things Gemstone, including player characters. (Its the same reason why Gemstone related writing, such as poetry and short stories are on KP) In one way, having the PCs here will allow people to at least walk down memory lane and at most, learn more about some of the individuals who played a role in historic events. As with any article, more content is desired, and hopefully those who have little said about them will one day have a lot more. I suppose more importantly, there really isn't a "notability" requirement for articles on Krakiipedia. They just need to be related to Gemstone. Regardless, I believe its a good idea if only to do that memory lane thing. :) [[User:REBELAT\|Rail]] 21:52, 14 January 2007 (EST)

Maintenance script at 02:39, 15 January 2007

2007-01-15T02:39:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 14 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't ~~see~~ the logic in having ~~just~~ a listing of adventurers with most the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)		I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive, I don't understand the logic in having a listing of adventurers with most of the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? Just an honest question here, and no offense meant to anyone. [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)

Maintenance script at 02:38, 15 January 2007

2007-01-15T02:38:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 14 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not containing much info. [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)		I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)

Maintenance script at 02:37, 15 January 2007

2007-01-15T02:37:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 14 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not containing much info.		I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not containing much info. [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)

Maintenance script: New page: I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not cont...

2007-01-15T02:37:21Z

New page: I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not cont...

New page

I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not containing much info.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:50, 15 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive, I don't understand the logic in having a listing of adventurers with most of the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? Just an honest question here, and no offense meant to anyone. [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)		I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive, I don't understand the logic in having a listing of adventurers with most of the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? Just an honest question here, and no offense meant to anyone. [[User:CARABELE\|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)
	:I actually have covered this topic with Oliver, who, if I get this wrong, can gladly step in and correct me. He told me he'd like for Krakiipedia to become an archive and source of information for all things Gemstone, including player characters. (Its the same reason why Gemstone related writing, such as poetry and short stories are on KP) In one way, having the PCs here will allow people to at least walk down memory lane and at most, learn more about some of the individuals who played a role in historic events. As with any article, more content is desired, and hopefully those who have little said about them will one day have a lot more. I suppose more importantly, there really isn't a "notability" requirement for articles on Krakiipedia. They just need to be related to Gemstone. Regardless, I believe its a good idea if only to do that memory lane thing. :) [[User:REBELAT\|Rail]] 21:52, 14 January 2007 (EST)		:I actually have covered this topic with Oliver, who, if I get this wrong, can gladly step in and correct me. He told me he'd like for Krakiipedia to become an archive and source of information for all things Gemstone, including player characters. (Its the same reason why Gemstone related writing, such as poetry and short stories are on KP) In one way, having the PCs here will allow people to at least walk down memory lane and at most, learn more about some of the individuals who played a role in historic events. As with any article, more content is desired, and hopefully those who have little said about them will one day have a lot more. I suppose more importantly, there really isn't a "notability" requirement for articles on Krakiipedia. They just need to be related to Gemstone. Regardless, I believe its a good idea if only to do that memory lane thing. :) [[User:REBELAT\|Rail]] 21:52, 14 January 2007 (EST)
			:: Rail summed it up fairly well. In general, I don't believe there is a 'good' or 'bad' use of the wiki. If it has to do with GemStone IV, then it has a place here. For myself, personally, the interest is more in the world and the history than the mechanics of the game. However, I recognize that a central location for all things related to mechanics is not only useful in general to the GemStome community, but also some people's cup of tea when it comes to these sorts of projects. In any case, I firmly believe that the adventurers of GemStone belong with the history of the game and Elanthia. Some have left their mark, and significant ones at that. It should be noted somewhere. :) [[User:Anshou\|Oliver]] <sup>[[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]</sup> 03:50, 15 January 2007 (EST)