Talk:Blood Burst (701) - Revision history

GS4-KEIOS: 5 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:20Z

5 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 10:57, 12 January 2006

2006-01-12T10:57:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:57, 12 January 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::: That seems pretty reasonable to me. [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 01:06, 12 January 2006 (CST)		::: That seems pretty reasonable to me. [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 01:06, 12 January 2006 (CST)

	In terms of this specific document, I'd like to cut down on the examples, but I'm still all for an example or two per formula. For instance, I'd like to think that "truncated" is pretty clear, but tossing in an example for an endroll of 119 might still be a good idea. Likewise, when I say "initial damage," an example helps to illustrate that. I'd be fine with removing the examples in the third paragraph, though. I'll clip them out, and we'll see if it detracts from readability. Personally, I'm all for examples so that it's very clear what the document means. I'd much rather have one or two than none.		:::: In terms of this specific document, I'd like to cut down on the examples, but I'm still all for an example or two per formula. For instance, I'd like to think that "truncated" is pretty clear, but tossing in an example for an endroll of 119 might still be a good idea. Likewise, when I say "initial damage," an example helps to illustrate that. I'd be fine with removing the examples in the third paragraph, though. I'll clip them out, and we'll see if it detracts from readability. Personally, I'm all for examples so that it's very clear what the document means. I'd much rather have one or two than none. [[User:MYTHOS-KAROS\|Mekthros]] 04:57, 12 January 2006 (CST)

Maintenance script at 10:55, 12 January 2006

2006-01-12T10:55:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:55, 12 January 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::: That seems pretty reasonable to me. [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 01:06, 12 January 2006 (CST)		::: That seems pretty reasonable to me. [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 01:06, 12 January 2006 (CST)

			In terms of this specific document, I'd like to cut down on the examples, but I'm still all for an example or two per formula. For instance, I'd like to think that "truncated" is pretty clear, but tossing in an example for an endroll of 119 might still be a good idea. Likewise, when I say "initial damage," an example helps to illustrate that. I'd be fine with removing the examples in the third paragraph, though. I'll clip them out, and we'll see if it detracts from readability. Personally, I'm all for examples so that it's very clear what the document means. I'd much rather have one or two than none.

Maintenance script at 07:06, 12 January 2006

2006-01-12T07:06:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 12 January 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:: My personal inclination would be to have zero examples unless its a really complicated formula or an involved process to uncover the factors. In those cases I think an example may be appropriate. In this particular article its fairly straightforward, I dont think any examples are required, though I would like to hear the thoughts of others on the topic. [[User:ULTHRIPE\|ULTHRIPE]] 00:50, 12 January 2006 (CST)		:: My personal inclination would be to have zero examples unless its a really complicated formula or an involved process to uncover the factors. In those cases I think an example may be appropriate. In this particular article its fairly straightforward, I dont think any examples are required, though I would like to hear the thoughts of others on the topic. [[User:ULTHRIPE\|ULTHRIPE]] 00:50, 12 January 2006 (CST)

			::: That seems pretty reasonable to me. [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 01:06, 12 January 2006 (CST)

Maintenance script at 06:50, 12 January 2006

2006-01-12T06:50:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:50, 12 January 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Enough that it's clear but not so many that it's overwhelming. 2 per formula might be considered too many, but not necessarily. It's a wiki, discuss it with anyone who's interested and let us know what you come up with :) [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 00:44, 12 January 2006 (CST)		:Enough that it's clear but not so many that it's overwhelming. 2 per formula might be considered too many, but not necessarily. It's a wiki, discuss it with anyone who's interested and let us know what you come up with :) [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 00:44, 12 January 2006 (CST)

			:: My personal inclination would be to have zero examples unless its a really complicated formula or an involved process to uncover the factors. In those cases I think an example may be appropriate. In this particular article its fairly straightforward, I dont think any examples are required, though I would like to hear the thoughts of others on the topic. [[User:ULTHRIPE\|ULTHRIPE]] 00:50, 12 January 2006 (CST)

Maintenance script at 06:44, 12 January 2006

2006-01-12T06:44:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 12 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Sysops: What is the apporpriate amount of examples? It would seem to me that 2 examples per formula is excessive. Mekthros: Go make your user page! [[User:ULTHRIPE\|ULTHRIPE]] 00:31, 12 January 2006 (CST)		Sysops: What is the apporpriate amount of examples? It would seem to me that 2 examples per formula is excessive. Mekthros: Go make your user page! [[User:ULTHRIPE\|ULTHRIPE]] 00:31, 12 January 2006 (CST)

			:Enough that it's clear but not so many that it's overwhelming. 2 per formula might be considered too many, but not necessarily. It's a wiki, discuss it with anyone who's interested and let us know what you come up with :) [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 00:44, 12 January 2006 (CST)

Maintenance script at 06:31, 12 January 2006

2006-01-12T06:31:38Z

New page

Sysops: What is the apporpriate amount of examples? It would seem to me that 2 examples per formula is excessive. Mekthros: Go make your user page! [[User:ULTHRIPE|ULTHRIPE]] 00:31, 12 January 2006 (CST)