Talk:Censure (316) - Revision history

ZHOUY1: Missing messaging lines.

2016-02-08T20:32:38Z

Missing messaging lines.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 8 February 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	One of my medium-term goals is to make a page for deity-specific messaging '''in general''', and the [[CONVERT (verb)]] page now should link to every page with different messaging. With [[Censure (316)]], I was following the model I'd started with [[Well of Life (308)]] - the meat of the spell first, with the deity-specific bits at the end. I can add a seperate page for it (or a subpage), but I was starting to wonder if that wasn't getting into the weeds. [[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 23:41, 10 February 2007 (EST)		One of my medium-term goals is to make a page for deity-specific messaging '''in general''', and the [[CONVERT (verb)]] page now should link to every page with different messaging. With [[Censure (316)]], I was following the model I'd started with [[Well of Life (308)]] - the meat of the spell first, with the deity-specific bits at the end. I can add a seperate page for it (or a subpage), but I was starting to wonder if that wasn't getting into the weeds. [[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 23:41, 10 February 2007 (EST)

			== Messaging ==

			Most of the spell messaging listed here (now moved to the main deity messaging page) started at "For your transgressions..." and were missing the initial line, for example for Ivas: "In a lush, seductive voice, (caster) purrs out an incantation in an unknown language." The line should be added to the main page if known. [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:32, 8 February 2016 (CST)

VANKRASN39: remove broken link

2015-03-17T19:51:33Z

remove broken link

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 17 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like [[Censure (messaging)]] I think would be appropriate. I'd include the spell number, but I think that [[Censure (316) (messaging)]] would just be silly. Of course, just because I'm a SysOp doesn't mean my word is law -- it is nothing more than a suggestion, at this point. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 22:17, 10 February 2007 (EST)		I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like '''Censure (messaging)''' I think would be appropriate. I'd include the spell number, but I think that [[Censure (316) (messaging)]] would just be silly. Of course, just because I'm a SysOp doesn't mean my word is law -- it is nothing more than a suggestion, at this point. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 22:17, 10 February 2007 (EST)

	One of my medium-term goals is to make a page for deity-specific messaging '''in general''', and the [[CONVERT (verb)]] page now should link to every page with different messaging. With [[Censure (316)]], I was following the model I'd started with [[Well of Life (308)]] - the meat of the spell first, with the deity-specific bits at the end. I can add a seperate page for it (or a subpage), but I was starting to wonder if that wasn't getting into the weeds. [[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 23:41, 10 February 2007 (EST)		One of my medium-term goals is to make a page for deity-specific messaging '''in general''', and the [[CONVERT (verb)]] page now should link to every page with different messaging. With [[Censure (316)]], I was following the model I'd started with [[Well of Life (308)]] - the meat of the spell first, with the deity-specific bits at the end. I can add a seperate page for it (or a subpage), but I was starting to wonder if that wasn't getting into the weeds. [[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 23:41, 10 February 2007 (EST)

GS4-KEIOS: 1 revision: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:20Z

1 revision: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 04:41, 11 February 2007

2007-02-11T04:41:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 10 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like [[Censure (messaging)]] I think would be appropriate. I'd include the spell number, but I think that [[Censure (316) (messaging)]] would just be silly. Of course, just because I'm a SysOp doesn't mean my word is law -- it is nothing more than a suggestion, at this point. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 22:17, 10 February 2007 (EST)		I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like [[Censure (messaging)]] I think would be appropriate. I'd include the spell number, but I think that [[Censure (316) (messaging)]] would just be silly. Of course, just because I'm a SysOp doesn't mean my word is law -- it is nothing more than a suggestion, at this point. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 22:17, 10 February 2007 (EST)

			One of my medium-term goals is to make a page for deity-specific messaging '''in general''', and the [[CONVERT (verb)]] page now should link to every page with different messaging. With [[Censure (316)]], I was following the model I'd started with [[Well of Life (308)]] - the meat of the spell first, with the deity-specific bits at the end. I can add a seperate page for it (or a subpage), but I was starting to wonder if that wasn't getting into the weeds. [[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 23:41, 10 February 2007 (EST)

Maintenance script: New page: I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like Censure (messaging) I think would be appropriate. I'd include the spell number, but I th...

2007-02-11T03:17:23Z

New page: I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like Censure (messaging) I think would be appropriate. I'd include the spell number, but I th...

New page

I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like [[Censure (messaging)]] I think would be appropriate. I'd include the spell number, but I think that [[Censure (316) (messaging)]] would just be silly. Of course, just because I'm a SysOp doesn't mean my word is law -- it is nothing more than a suggestion, at this point. - [[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 22:17, 10 February 2007 (EST)