Talk:Cleric - Revision history

VANKRASN39: /* Spell Listings */

2017-02-05T07:40:05Z

Spell Listings

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 5 February 2017
Line 24:		Line 24:
	It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)		It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)

	I agree that none of them should be listed but rather just point to the spell lists themselves. I added them because players value spells differently and figured if we were going to list some then we should list all. I thought it redundant at the time, but was more focused on adding rather than removing text. I'll remove all the spells and just point them to the spell lists. This makes the most sense as future changes will be updated automatically. The focus should always be to have the information listed in one place and the point to the source whenever possible. -Palvella		:I agree that none of them should be listed but rather just point to the spell lists themselves. I added them because players value spells differently and figured if we were going to list some then we should list all. I thought it redundant at the time, but was more focused on adding rather than removing text. I'll remove all the spells and just point them to the spell lists. This makes the most sense as future changes will be updated automatically. The focus should always be to have the information listed in one place and the point to the source whenever possible. -Palvella

			::I made an attempt to standardize it with the other pure profession pages/bring it up to grammar/editing standards, but I think it still needs heavy editing. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 01:40, 5 February 2017 (CST)

GS4-PALVELLA: /* Spell Listings */

2017-02-04T19:10:48Z

Spell Listings

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 4 February 2017
Line 24:		Line 24:
	It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)		It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)

	I agree that none of them should be listed but rather just point to the spell lists themselves. I added them because players value spells differently and figured if we were going to list some then we should list all. I thought it redundant at the time, but was more focused on adding rather than removing text. I'll remove all the spells and just point them to the spell lists. This makes the most sense as future changes will be updated automatically. The focus should always be to have the information listed in one place and the point to the source whenever possible.		I agree that none of them should be listed but rather just point to the spell lists themselves. I added them because players value spells differently and figured if we were going to list some then we should list all. I thought it redundant at the time, but was more focused on adding rather than removing text. I'll remove all the spells and just point them to the spell lists. This makes the most sense as future changes will be updated automatically. The focus should always be to have the information listed in one place and the point to the source whenever possible. -Palvella

GS4-PALVELLA: /* Spell Listings */

2017-02-04T19:01:43Z

Spell Listings

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 4 February 2017
Line 24:		Line 24:
	It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)		It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)

	I agree that none of them should be listed but rather just point to the spell lists themselves. I added them because players value spells differently and figured if we were going to list some then we should list all. I thought it redundant at the time, but was more focused on adding rather than removing text. I'll remove all the spells and just point them to the spell lists. This makes the most sense as future changes will be updated automatically. The focus should always be to have the information listed in one place and the point to the source whenever possible.~~[[User:GS4-Palvella\|GS4-Palvella]] ([[User talk:GS4-Palvella\|talk]])~~		I agree that none of them should be listed but rather just point to the spell lists themselves. I added them because players value spells differently and figured if we were going to list some then we should list all. I thought it redundant at the time, but was more focused on adding rather than removing text. I'll remove all the spells and just point them to the spell lists. This makes the most sense as future changes will be updated automatically. The focus should always be to have the information listed in one place and the point to the source whenever possible.

GS4-PALVELLA: /* Spell Listings */

2017-02-04T19:00:47Z

Spell Listings

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 4 February 2017
Line 24:		Line 24:
	It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)		It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)

	I agree that none of them should be listed but rather just point to the spell lists themselves. I added them because players value spells differently and figured if we were going to list some then we should list all. I thought it redundant at the time, but was more focused on adding rather than removing text. I'll remove all the spells and just point them to the spell lists. This makes the most sense as future changes will be updated automatically. The focus should always be to have the information listed in one place and the point to the source whenever possible.		I agree that none of them should be listed but rather just point to the spell lists themselves. I added them because players value spells differently and figured if we were going to list some then we should list all. I thought it redundant at the time, but was more focused on adding rather than removing text. I'll remove all the spells and just point them to the spell lists. This makes the most sense as future changes will be updated automatically. The focus should always be to have the information listed in one place and the point to the source whenever possible.[[User:GS4-Palvella\|GS4-Palvella]] ([[User talk:GS4-Palvella\|talk]])

GS4-PALVELLA at 18:56, 4 February 2017

2017-02-04T18:56:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 4 February 2017
Line 23:		Line 23:
	==Spell Listings==		==Spell Listings==
	It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)		It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)

			I agree that none of them should be listed but rather just point to the spell lists themselves. I added them because players value spells differently and figured if we were going to list some then we should list all. I thought it redundant at the time, but was more focused on adding rather than removing text. I'll remove all the spells and just point them to the spell lists. This makes the most sense as future changes will be updated automatically. The focus should always be to have the information listed in one place and the point to the source whenever possible.

VANKRASN39: /* Spell Listings */

2017-02-03T01:04:05Z

Spell Listings

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 2 February 2017
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==Spell Listings==		==Spell Listings==
	It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)		It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. And after further review, they should probably all be moved to their respective spell circle pages. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)

VANKRASN39: /* Spell Listings */

2017-02-03T00:54:15Z

Spell Listings

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 2 February 2017
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==Spell Listings==		==Spell Listings==
	It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance adds any quality to the article. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)		It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance or Prayer of Holding adds any quality to the article. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)

VANKRASN39 at 00:53, 3 February 2017

2017-02-03T00:53:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 2 February 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:Well, I like how the page is turning out; good job. Yeah, the verbs list in KP does need some work -- there are many resources for verbs, but KP isn't really one of them, yet. Granted, it probably covers the verbs it does have more thoroughly than most other resources. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 03:59, 5 February 2007 (EST)		:Well, I like how the page is turning out; good job. Yeah, the verbs list in KP does need some work -- there are many resources for verbs, but KP isn't really one of them, yet. Granted, it probably covers the verbs it does have more thoroughly than most other resources. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 03:59, 5 February 2007 (EST)

			==Spell Listings==
			It seems that slowly but surely, every single spell in the 3 circles is being added to the list of highlighted spells. While I agree with newer Cleric Base spells being added, I don't agree that adding something like Disease Resistance adds any quality to the article. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (CST)

GS4-KEIOS: 2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:20Z

2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 08:59, 5 February 2007

2007-02-05T08:59:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 5 February 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Immediate plans: Flesh out skill training, put up basic articles for the archetypes (I can write SorcPriest and Rescuing Cleric, but I know next-to-nothing about Melee), and then hit up the verbs.		Immediate plans: Flesh out skill training, put up basic articles for the archetypes (I can write SorcPriest and Rescuing Cleric, but I know next-to-nothing about Melee), and then hit up the verbs.
	[[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 18:28, 4 February 2007 (EST)		[[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 18:28, 4 February 2007 (EST)

			:Well, I like how the page is turning out; good job. Yeah, the verbs list in KP does need some work -- there are many resources for verbs, but KP isn't really one of them, yet. Granted, it probably covers the verbs it does have more thoroughly than most other resources. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 03:59, 5 February 2007 (EST)