Talk:Combat system - Revision history

VANKRASN39 at 19:59, 6 October 2016

2016-10-06T19:59:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 6 October 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::Yes, that's much better. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:39, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		:::Yes, that's much better. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:39, 6 October 2016 (CDT)
	::::I'll make the changes and also restore the <code>\quad</code> spacing edits. [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		::::I'll make the changes and also restore the <code>\quad</code> spacing edits. [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

			:::::Sure :) I put the \quads in there because I was trying to figure out why there was an extra space before Base Value. I have no clue. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:59, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

ZHOUY1 at 19:52, 6 October 2016

2016-10-06T19:52:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 6 October 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:::Yes, that's much better. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:39, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		:::Yes, that's much better. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:39, 6 October 2016 (CDT)
			::::I'll make the changes and also restore the <code>\quad</code> spacing edits. [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

VANKRASN39 at 19:39, 6 October 2016

2016-10-06T19:39:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 6 October 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:How about only bunching when there's a subscripted part? It's really rough to read. I also really prefer brackets instead of double parentheses [( ... )] vs (( ... )). [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:27, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		:How about only bunching when there's a subscripted part? It's really rough to read. I also really prefer brackets instead of double parentheses [( ... )] vs (( ... )). [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:27, 6 October 2016 (CDT)
	::Is it better with brackets around the variables? <math>[\mathrm{Shield\ Size\ Modifier}]_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math> [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:31, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		::Is it better with brackets around the variables? <math>[\mathrm{Shield\ Size\ Modifier}]_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math> [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:31, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

			:::Yes, that's much better. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:39, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

ZHOUY1 at 19:31, 6 October 2016

2016-10-06T19:31:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 6 October 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:How about only bunching when there's a subscripted part? It's really rough to read. I also really prefer brackets instead of double parentheses [( ... )] vs (( ... )). [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:27, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		:How about only bunching when there's a subscripted part? It's really rough to read. I also really prefer brackets instead of double parentheses [( ... )] vs (( ... )). [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:27, 6 October 2016 (CDT)
			::Is it better with brackets around the variables? <math>[\mathrm{Shield\ Size\ Modifier}]_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math> [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:31, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

VANKRASN39 at 19:30, 6 October 2016

2016-10-06T19:30:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 6 October 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	[[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 13:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		[[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 13:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

	:How about only bunching when there's a subscripted part? It's really rough to read. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:27, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		:How about only bunching when there's a subscripted part? It's really rough to read. I also really prefer brackets instead of double parentheses [( ... )] vs (( ... )). [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:27, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

VANKRASN39: response

2016-10-06T19:27:34Z

response

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 6 October 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*Subscript scoping makes more sense in non-spaced variables. Compare: <math>\mathrm{ShieldSizeModifier}_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math> vs. <math>\mathrm{Shield\ Size\ Modifier}_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math>: it's more obvious in the first case that the subscript applies to the entire variable name.		*Subscript scoping makes more sense in non-spaced variables. Compare: <math>\mathrm{ShieldSizeModifier}_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math> vs. <math>\mathrm{Shield\ Size\ Modifier}_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math>: it's more obvious in the first case that the subscript applies to the entire variable name.
	[[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 13:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		[[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 13:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

			:How about only bunching when there's a subscripted part? It's really rough to read. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:27, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

ZHOUY1: subjective aesthetic reasons

2016-10-06T18:52:18Z

subjective aesthetic reasons

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 6 October 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Didn't you want \cdots and not Xs? Spaces are also much easier to read. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 13:36, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		Didn't you want \cdots and not Xs? Spaces are also much easier to read. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 13:36, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

			I tried a few ways of formatting these formulas and prefer this over the alternatives, and it has to do with the multi-word variable names.
			*While <math>a \cdot b + c</math> is better than <math>a \times b + c</math>, I don't think <math>\mathrm{VeryLongVariableName} \cdot \mathrm{AnotherVariableName} + \mathrm{YetAnotherVariableName}</math> is necessarily more intuitive, and since the reader won't mix up <math>x</math> with <math>\times</math> if all the variables are long words it's fine to let stand.
			*Subscript scoping makes more sense in non-spaced variables. Compare: <math>\mathrm{ShieldSizeModifier}_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math> vs. <math>\mathrm{Shield\ Size\ Modifier}_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math>: it's more obvious in the first case that the subscript applies to the entire variable name.
			[[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 13:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

VANKRASN39: wrong slash

2016-10-06T18:39:10Z

wrong slash

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 6 October 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Didn't you want /cdots and not Xs? Spaces are also much easier to read. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 13:36, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		Didn't you want \cdots and not Xs? Spaces are also much easier to read. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 13:36, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

VANKRASN39: math Q

2016-10-06T18:36:47Z

math Q

New page

Didn't you want /cdots and not Xs? Spaces are also much easier to read. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 13:36, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 6 October 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::Yes, that's much better. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:39, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		:::Yes, that's much better. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:39, 6 October 2016 (CDT)
	::::I'll make the changes and also restore the <code>\quad</code> spacing edits. [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		::::I'll make the changes and also restore the <code>\quad</code> spacing edits. [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:52, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

			:::::Sure :) I put the \quads in there because I was trying to figure out why there was an extra space before Base Value. I have no clue. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:59, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 6 October 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:How about only bunching when there's a subscripted part? It's really rough to read. I also really prefer brackets instead of double parentheses [( ... )] vs (( ... )). [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:27, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		:How about only bunching when there's a subscripted part? It's really rough to read. I also really prefer brackets instead of double parentheses [( ... )] vs (( ... )). [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:27, 6 October 2016 (CDT)
	::Is it better with brackets around the variables? <math>[\mathrm{Shield\ Size\ Modifier}]_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math> [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:31, 6 October 2016 (CDT)		::Is it better with brackets around the variables? <math>[\mathrm{Shield\ Size\ Modifier}]_{\mathrm{Ranged}}</math> [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:31, 6 October 2016 (CDT)

			:::Yes, that's much better. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:39, 6 October 2016 (CDT)