https://gswiki.play.net/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ADamage_cycleTalk:Damage cycle - Revision history2026-05-18T12:21:43ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.12https://gswiki.play.net/index.php?title=Talk:Damage_cycle&diff=100726&oldid=prevKRAKII: Created page with "I disagree that the 62hp instance in the clip shown is a 'damage cycle' per se; that appears to be the base damage inflicted by the spell's effect. However, I am perfectly wi..."2017-11-27T15:36:40Z<p>Created page with "I disagree that the 62hp instance in the clip shown is a 'damage cycle' per se; that appears to be the base damage inflicted by the spell's effect. However, I am perfectly wi..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I disagree that the 62hp instance in the clip shown is a 'damage cycle' per se; that appears to be the base damage inflicted by the spell's effect. However, I am perfectly willing to agree that the lower two sets of messaging ARE 'damage cycle's. Should the "<-" indicator be removed from that first one? [[User:KRAKII|KRAKII]] ([[User talk:KRAKII|talk]]) 09:36, 27 November 2017 (CST)</div>KRAKII