Talk:Dark Alliance - Revision history

GS4-KEIOS: 3 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:21Z

3 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

DRIZZT-12 at 21:00, 6 July 2007

2007-07-06T21:00:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 6 July 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:: Spiff, in that case, we can add a few more. [[User:MOURNE\|Jen]] 18:00, 1 July 2007 (EDT)		:: Spiff, in that case, we can add a few more. [[User:MOURNE\|Jen]] 18:00, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

			::: Yeah, Valanis never got a pendant. He just happened to not be around at the times they were given out. [[User:DRIZZT-12\|Adam]] <sup>[[User talk:DRIZZT-12\|talk]]</sup> 17:00, 6 July 2007 (EDT)

MOURNE at 22:00, 1 July 2007

2007-07-01T22:00:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 1 July 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: When I threw the list on there, it was just pendant-holders that I was listing. Though, in retrospect, I realize that holding a pendant had really little importance in how everything played out; adding non-pendant-holders wouldn't hurt this list. Both of those that held pendants and those that did not did everything (in some cases) they could to aid the Dark Alliance, and both were equally held as enemies of the Resistance. I did think of the pendant-holders as the only 'true' members, for a time, though. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 23:17, 30 June 2007 (EDT)		: When I threw the list on there, it was just pendant-holders that I was listing. Though, in retrospect, I realize that holding a pendant had really little importance in how everything played out; adding non-pendant-holders wouldn't hurt this list. Both of those that held pendants and those that did not did everything (in some cases) they could to aid the Dark Alliance, and both were equally held as enemies of the Resistance. I did think of the pendant-holders as the only 'true' members, for a time, though. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 23:17, 30 June 2007 (EDT)

			:: Spiff, in that case, we can add a few more. [[User:MOURNE\|Jen]] 18:00, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

Maintenance script: Response.

2007-07-01T03:17:37Z

Response.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 30 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I assumed 'known members' was a list of pendant-holders. Are we also including supporters? (Or did Valanis get one? I don't recall that he did.) [[User:MOURNE\|Jen]] 22:09, 30 June 2007 (EDT)		I assumed 'known members' was a list of pendant-holders. Are we also including supporters? (Or did Valanis get one? I don't recall that he did.) [[User:MOURNE\|Jen]] 22:09, 30 June 2007 (EDT)

			: When I threw the list on there, it was just pendant-holders that I was listing. Though, in retrospect, I realize that holding a pendant had really little importance in how everything played out; adding non-pendant-holders wouldn't hurt this list. Both of those that held pendants and those that did not did everything (in some cases) they could to aid the Dark Alliance, and both were equally held as enemies of the Resistance. I did think of the pendant-holders as the only 'true' members, for a time, though. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 23:17, 30 June 2007 (EDT)

MOURNE: New page: I assumed 'known members' was a list of pendant-holders. Are we also including supporters? (Or did Valanis get one? I don't recall that he did.) ~~~~

2007-07-01T02:09:33Z

New page: I assumed 'known members' was a list of pendant-holders. Are we also including supporters? (Or did Valanis get one? I don't recall that he did.) ~~~~

New page

I assumed 'known members' was a list of pendant-holders. Are we also including supporters? (Or did Valanis get one? I don't recall that he did.) [[User:MOURNE|Jen]] 22:09, 30 June 2007 (EDT)