Talk:Empath - Revision history

GS4-KEIOS: 2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:21Z

2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 01:24, 1 June 2006

2006-06-01T01:24:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 31 May 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: That's partially why it's subjective, really. I think that Empaths are more or less as 'complete' as any other profession we have right now. Yes, there are plans for changes to occur within the professiona at some point in the future, and it might be worthwhile to include in the article (perhaps under a "The Future of Empaths" heading somewhere) but I don't believe it's necessary to include in the opening paragraph of the article. The opening paragraph should generally aim to concisely introduce and explain, to an extent, the topic of the article. - Oliver ([[User:Anshou\|User]] \| [[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]) 17:38, 31 May 2006 (PDT)		: That's partially why it's subjective, really. I think that Empaths are more or less as 'complete' as any other profession we have right now. Yes, there are plans for changes to occur within the professiona at some point in the future, and it might be worthwhile to include in the article (perhaps under a "The Future of Empaths" heading somewhere) but I don't believe it's necessary to include in the opening paragraph of the article. The opening paragraph should generally aim to concisely introduce and explain, to an extent, the topic of the article. - Oliver ([[User:Anshou\|User]] \| [[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]) 17:38, 31 May 2006 (PDT)

			:: Sounds good to me. I'll see what I can do with do with it. [[User:IRVINETOMOE\|IRVINETOMOE]] 18:24, 31 May 2006 (PDT)

Maintenance script at 00:38, 1 June 2006

2006-06-01T00:38:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 31 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	While I can see the subjective content, and thanks for cleaning up my messy writing, don't you think that mention of Empath's semi-complete status should be included? Its rather important I think. [[User:IRVINETOMOE\|IRVINETOMOE]] 14:14, 31 May 2006 (PDT)		While I can see the subjective content, and thanks for cleaning up my messy writing, don't you think that mention of Empath's semi-complete status should be included? Its rather important I think. [[User:IRVINETOMOE\|IRVINETOMOE]] 14:14, 31 May 2006 (PDT)

			: That's partially why it's subjective, really. I think that Empaths are more or less as 'complete' as any other profession we have right now. Yes, there are plans for changes to occur within the professiona at some point in the future, and it might be worthwhile to include in the article (perhaps under a "The Future of Empaths" heading somewhere) but I don't believe it's necessary to include in the opening paragraph of the article. The opening paragraph should generally aim to concisely introduce and explain, to an extent, the topic of the article. - Oliver ([[User:Anshou\|User]] \| [[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]) 17:38, 31 May 2006 (PDT)

Maintenance script at 21:14, 31 May 2006

2006-05-31T21:14:47Z

New page

While I can see the subjective content, and thanks for cleaning up my messy writing, don't you think that mention of Empath's semi-complete status should be included? Its rather important I think. [[User:IRVINETOMOE|IRVINETOMOE]] 14:14, 31 May 2006 (PDT)