Talk:Empathic Assault (1110) - Revision history

VANKRASN39 at 15:03, 8 October 2015

2015-10-08T15:03:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:03, 8 October 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:

	[[User:THIKKET\|THIKKET]] 14:13, 1 September 2012 (EDT)		[[User:THIKKET\|THIKKET]] 14:13, 1 September 2012 (EDT)
			::GM Estild confirms that MMC does add to damage. Details added to page. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 10:03, 8 October 2015 (CDT)

	I saw the MMC factor was removed from the page. I like to get GM confirmation before removing things from the Wiki that appear in the official spell description. Sometimes it even uncovers bugs. Posting on Officials. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:01, 7 October 2015 (CDT)		I saw the MMC factor was removed from the page. I like to get GM confirmation before removing things from the Wiki that appear in the official spell description. Sometimes it even uncovers bugs. Posting on Officials. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:01, 7 October 2015 (CDT)

VANKRASN39: re: MMC removal

2015-10-08T04:01:42Z

re: MMC removal

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 7 October 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:

	[[User:THIKKET\|THIKKET]] 14:13, 1 September 2012 (EDT)		[[User:THIKKET\|THIKKET]] 14:13, 1 September 2012 (EDT)

			I saw the MMC factor was removed from the page. I like to get GM confirmation before removing things from the Wiki that appear in the official spell description. Sometimes it even uncovers bugs. Posting on Officials. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:01, 7 October 2015 (CDT)

Maintenance script: Created page with 'Parsing a few logs of other players using Empathic Assault, it appears that the damage done in the CS cycles is roughly predicted by: (15 + 0.5*(endroll - 100)) for the players…'

2012-09-01T18:13:39Z

Created page with 'Parsing a few logs of other players using Empathic Assault, it appears that the damage done in the CS cycles is roughly predicted by: (15 + 0.5*(endroll - 100)) for the players…'

New page

Parsing a few logs of other players using Empathic Assault, it appears that the damage done in the CS cycles is roughly predicted by:

(15 + 0.5*(endroll - 100))

for the players I tested. The error bands get slightly higher for endrolls 200+, but I doubt many people will encounter that scenario in actual gameplay.

For 39 samples across 6 different players, the average error is -2.1, so this seems to be an accurate predictor.

The 6 players tested had extremely variable lore and Mental Mana Control training. There is no evidence that any of the following affect damage: Manipulation, Telepathy, Transformation, Mental Mana Control.

There may be a small variable component to damage (probably 1d5 at most). The same player on the same cycle number (#1) against the same target dealt 29 damage on a 128 enroll and 27 damage on a 129 endroll.

There is a small amount of evidence that later cycles do very slightly less damage (e.g. -1 dmg on the second cycle, -2 dmg on the third cycle), but this may be coincidence of variable damage and a small sample size.

[[User:THIKKET|THIKKET]] 14:13, 1 September 2012 (EDT)