Talk:Enchant (925)/Old version archived information - Revision history

HOST-GSKEBECHET: HOST-GSKEBECHET moved page Talk:Enchant (925)/Enchant Item (925) (old version) to Talk:Enchant (925)/Old version archived information: Updating with clearer sub-article title to indicate this is archived information

2025-09-16T14:34:01Z

HOST-GSKEBECHET moved page Talk:Enchant (925)/Enchant Item (925) (old version) to Talk:Enchant (925)/Old version archived information: Updating with clearer sub-article title to indicate this is archived information

← Older revision

Revision as of 09:34, 16 September 2025

WBURKE1: WBURKE1 moved page Talk:Enchant Item (925) to Talk:Enchant (925)/Enchant Item (925) (old version): moving the page to make clear that it is deprecated

2023-03-30T18:24:24Z

WBURKE1 moved page Talk:Enchant Item (925) to Talk:Enchant (925)/Enchant Item (925) (old version): moving the page to make clear that it is deprecated

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:24, 30 March 2023
(No difference)

PODMASTER: /* Infusing Information */ new section

2018-10-28T13:44:41Z

Infusing Information: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 28 October 2018
Line 71:		Line 71:

	This should probably be mentioned somewhere in the article, but I'm not sure where to fit it. [[User:CLAIRETTE\|CLAIRETTE]] ([[User talk:CLAIRETTE\|talk]]) 23:18, 19 March 2018 (CDT)Clairette		This should probably be mentioned somewhere in the article, but I'm not sure where to fit it. [[User:CLAIRETTE\|CLAIRETTE]] ([[User talk:CLAIRETTE\|talk]]) 23:18, 19 March 2018 (CDT)Clairette

			== Infusing Information ==

			In a few places the infusing mana information says that you can only infuse a potion ONCE before pouring. My understanding is that this has been changed, but I'm not positive. Does anyone have information on this? [[User:PODMASTER\|PODMASTER]] ([[User talk:PODMASTER\|talk]]) 08:47, 28 October 2018 (CDT)

CLAIRETTE: /* Temp enhancements can not be enchanted. */ new section

2018-03-20T04:18:31Z

Temp enhancements can not be enchanted.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 19 March 2018
Line 64:		Line 64:

	:::::Ok, I'm going to weigh in. Two thoughts - this (clearly) affects more than this article and as such probably should be moved to the Village Pump for discussion; and, I think we can split the nickel and benefit the player base, but I'm hesitant to just throw it out as a suggestion because I sometimes presume a shared knowledge / goal that just isn't present. So with that - I'd suggest let's dial this down here, and dial it up on the Pump, if you would please be willing to join. [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 12:53, 23 January 2018 (CST)		:::::Ok, I'm going to weigh in. Two thoughts - this (clearly) affects more than this article and as such probably should be moved to the Village Pump for discussion; and, I think we can split the nickel and benefit the player base, but I'm hesitant to just throw it out as a suggestion because I sometimes presume a shared knowledge / goal that just isn't present. So with that - I'd suggest let's dial this down here, and dial it up on the Pump, if you would please be willing to join. [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 12:53, 23 January 2018 (CST)

			== Temp enhancements can not be enchanted. ==

			Estild - Today at 11:35 PM
			Temporarily enhanced items cannot be tempered.

			This should probably be mentioned somewhere in the article, but I'm not sure where to fit it. [[User:CLAIRETTE\|CLAIRETTE]] ([[User talk:CLAIRETTE\|talk]]) 23:18, 19 March 2018 (CDT)Clairette

DOUG: Along the spectrum of troubled to livid, and asking for help.

2018-01-23T18:53:58Z

Along the spectrum of troubled to livid, and asking for help.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 23 January 2018
Line 62:		Line 62:

	::::It doesn't belong in the main article because: it is too long and complicated, it is not GM confirmed, it does not comply with the style guide and it is not grandfathered in. Isn't that what you said? And what does this have to do with my past support for you? I've created the appropriate research pages and now the information is no longer easily accessible in one location. I can't emphasize strongly enough how idiotic I think this is. [[User:SPYRIDONM1\|Mark]] ([[User talk:SPYRIDONM1\|talk]]) 00:10, 23 January 2018 (CST)		::::It doesn't belong in the main article because: it is too long and complicated, it is not GM confirmed, it does not comply with the style guide and it is not grandfathered in. Isn't that what you said? And what does this have to do with my past support for you? I've created the appropriate research pages and now the information is no longer easily accessible in one location. I can't emphasize strongly enough how idiotic I think this is. [[User:SPYRIDONM1\|Mark]] ([[User talk:SPYRIDONM1\|talk]]) 00:10, 23 January 2018 (CST)

			:::::Ok, I'm going to weigh in. Two thoughts - this (clearly) affects more than this article and as such probably should be moved to the Village Pump for discussion; and, I think we can split the nickel and benefit the player base, but I'm hesitant to just throw it out as a suggestion because I sometimes presume a shared knowledge / goal that just isn't present. So with that - I'd suggest let's dial this down here, and dial it up on the Pump, if you would please be willing to join. [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 12:53, 23 January 2018 (CST)

SPYRIDONM1: Additional comment

2018-01-23T07:48:54Z

Additional comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 23 January 2018
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:::I'm not sure why you're undoing all of those pages, all I said is it is helpful to indicate on an ongoing basis what is GM confirmed and what is not, and let's see if we can get this all verified. It seemed like over the years while you were away I had your support in what I did here, but I guess not. It makes me very sad to see. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (CST)		:::I'm not sure why you're undoing all of those pages, all I said is it is helpful to indicate on an ongoing basis what is GM confirmed and what is not, and let's see if we can get this all verified. It seemed like over the years while you were away I had your support in what I did here, but I guess not. It makes me very sad to see. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (CST)

	::::It doesn't belong in the main article because: it is too long and complicated, it is not GM confirmed, it does not comply with the style guide and it is not grandfathered in. Isn't that what you said? And what does this have to do with my past support for you? [[User:SPYRIDONM1\|Mark]] ([[User talk:SPYRIDONM1\|talk]]) 00:10, 23 January 2018 (CST)		::::It doesn't belong in the main article because: it is too long and complicated, it is not GM confirmed, it does not comply with the style guide and it is not grandfathered in. Isn't that what you said? And what does this have to do with my past support for you? I've created the appropriate research pages and now the information is no longer easily accessible in one location. I can't emphasize strongly enough how idiotic I think this is. [[User:SPYRIDONM1\|Mark]] ([[User talk:SPYRIDONM1\|talk]]) 00:10, 23 January 2018 (CST)

SPYRIDONM1 at 06:12, 23 January 2018

2018-01-23T06:12:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 23 January 2018
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:::I'm not sure why you're undoing all of those pages, all I said is it is helpful to indicate on an ongoing basis what is GM confirmed and what is not, and let's see if we can get this all verified. It seemed like over the years while you were away I had your support in what I did here, but I guess not. It makes me very sad to see. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (CST)		:::I'm not sure why you're undoing all of those pages, all I said is it is helpful to indicate on an ongoing basis what is GM confirmed and what is not, and let's see if we can get this all verified. It seemed like over the years while you were away I had your support in what I did here, but I guess not. It makes me very sad to see. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (CST)

	::::It doesn't belong in the main article because: it is too long, it is not GM confirmed, it does not comply with the style guide and it is not grandfathered in. Isn't that what you said? And what does this have to do with my past support for you? [[User:SPYRIDONM1\|Mark]] ([[User talk:SPYRIDONM1\|talk]]) 00:10, 23 January 2018 (CST)		::::It doesn't belong in the main article because: it is too long and complicated, it is not GM confirmed, it does not comply with the style guide and it is not grandfathered in. Isn't that what you said? And what does this have to do with my past support for you? [[User:SPYRIDONM1\|Mark]] ([[User talk:SPYRIDONM1\|talk]]) 00:10, 23 January 2018 (CST)

SPYRIDONM1: response

2018-01-23T06:10:11Z

response

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 23 January 2018
Line 60:		Line 60:

	:::I'm not sure why you're undoing all of those pages, all I said is it is helpful to indicate on an ongoing basis what is GM confirmed and what is not, and let's see if we can get this all verified. It seemed like over the years while you were away I had your support in what I did here, but I guess not. It makes me very sad to see. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (CST)		:::I'm not sure why you're undoing all of those pages, all I said is it is helpful to indicate on an ongoing basis what is GM confirmed and what is not, and let's see if we can get this all verified. It seemed like over the years while you were away I had your support in what I did here, but I guess not. It makes me very sad to see. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (CST)

			::::It doesn't belong in the main article because: it is too long, it is not GM confirmed, it does not comply with the style guide and it is not grandfathered in. Isn't that what you said? And what does this have to do with my past support for you? [[User:SPYRIDONM1\|Mark]] ([[User talk:SPYRIDONM1\|talk]]) 00:10, 23 January 2018 (CST)

VANKRASN39: /* Formula */ more

2018-01-23T05:37:35Z

Formula: more

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:37, 23 January 2018
Line 59:		Line 59:
	::Yes, everything from before 2015 was grandfathered to remain where they were, and I went and had a lot of issues verified one by one. The entire concept of the research pages was vetted by both senior staff and fellow moderators and I'm sorry you were not here for it, but it is in the [[Help:Style#Research Pages\|Style Guide]]. I realize you are still operating as you were in 2014/early 2015, but the fact is that we do not have any official documentation in an fully official fashion, and it is really helpful to indicate which parts are not GM confirmed. I'll also admit that it is beneficial to put things on pages in order to get more revealed from the development side, so hopefully we can just get this verified. It sucks that Simu/GMs won't write their own comprehensive documentation and that we have to do it, and that we end up in situations like this. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 21:24, 22 January 2018 (CST)		::Yes, everything from before 2015 was grandfathered to remain where they were, and I went and had a lot of issues verified one by one. The entire concept of the research pages was vetted by both senior staff and fellow moderators and I'm sorry you were not here for it, but it is in the [[Help:Style#Research Pages\|Style Guide]]. I realize you are still operating as you were in 2014/early 2015, but the fact is that we do not have any official documentation in an fully official fashion, and it is really helpful to indicate which parts are not GM confirmed. I'll also admit that it is beneficial to put things on pages in order to get more revealed from the development side, so hopefully we can just get this verified. It sucks that Simu/GMs won't write their own comprehensive documentation and that we have to do it, and that we end up in situations like this. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 21:24, 22 January 2018 (CST)

	:::I'm not sure why you're undoing all of those pages, all I said is it is helpful to indicate on an ongoing basis what is GM confirmed and what is not. It seemed like over the years while you were away I had your support in what I did here, but I guess not. It makes me very sad to see. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (CST)		:::I'm not sure why you're undoing all of those pages, all I said is it is helpful to indicate on an ongoing basis what is GM confirmed and what is not, and let's see if we can get this all verified. It seemed like over the years while you were away I had your support in what I did here, but I guess not. It makes me very sad to see. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (CST)

VANKRASN39: /* Formula */ more

2018-01-23T05:30:42Z

Formula: more

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 23 January 2018
Line 58:		Line 58:

	::Yes, everything from before 2015 was grandfathered to remain where they were, and I went and had a lot of issues verified one by one. The entire concept of the research pages was vetted by both senior staff and fellow moderators and I'm sorry you were not here for it, but it is in the [[Help:Style#Research Pages\|Style Guide]]. I realize you are still operating as you were in 2014/early 2015, but the fact is that we do not have any official documentation in an fully official fashion, and it is really helpful to indicate which parts are not GM confirmed. I'll also admit that it is beneficial to put things on pages in order to get more revealed from the development side, so hopefully we can just get this verified. It sucks that Simu/GMs won't write their own comprehensive documentation and that we have to do it, and that we end up in situations like this. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 21:24, 22 January 2018 (CST)		::Yes, everything from before 2015 was grandfathered to remain where they were, and I went and had a lot of issues verified one by one. The entire concept of the research pages was vetted by both senior staff and fellow moderators and I'm sorry you were not here for it, but it is in the [[Help:Style#Research Pages\|Style Guide]]. I realize you are still operating as you were in 2014/early 2015, but the fact is that we do not have any official documentation in an fully official fashion, and it is really helpful to indicate which parts are not GM confirmed. I'll also admit that it is beneficial to put things on pages in order to get more revealed from the development side, so hopefully we can just get this verified. It sucks that Simu/GMs won't write their own comprehensive documentation and that we have to do it, and that we end up in situations like this. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 21:24, 22 January 2018 (CST)

			:::I'm not sure why you're undoing all of those pages, all I said is it is helpful to indicate on an ongoing basis what is GM confirmed and what is not. It seemed like over the years while you were away I had your support in what I did here, but I guess not. It makes me very sad to see. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (CST)