Talk:Enhancement - Revision history

VANKRASN39: ideas of what to do with this page. the contents are redundant/not up to snuff

2017-09-15T18:38:43Z

ideas of what to do with this page. the contents are redundant/not up to snuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 15 September 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:: If you're saying that [[damage weighting]] and [[critical weighting]] should be on one page, I disagree. They are unique enough in their own right to deserve individual pages, and its important to differentiate between the two. If you're saying there should be a main [[weighting]] page (similar to [[padding]]), which explains in general and links to each individual article, then carry on. SammichKing..[[User:ULTHRIPE\|who?]]..[[User talk:ULTHRIPE\|wha?]] 22:46, 2 April 2006 (PDT)		:: If you're saying that [[damage weighting]] and [[critical weighting]] should be on one page, I disagree. They are unique enough in their own right to deserve individual pages, and its important to differentiate between the two. If you're saying there should be a main [[weighting]] page (similar to [[padding]]), which explains in general and links to each individual article, then carry on. SammichKing..[[User:ULTHRIPE\|who?]]..[[User talk:ULTHRIPE\|wha?]] 22:46, 2 April 2006 (PDT)

			==Page Needed?==
			This page seems redundant with all of the item and service information that has been added to the wiki since 2012. It also hasn't been touched since 2006. One idea is to redirect it to [[item properties]] and put the otheruses template on that page. Other ideas welcome. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 13:38, 15 September 2017 (CDT)

GS4-KEIOS: 2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:21Z

2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 05:46, 3 April 2006

2006-04-03T05:46:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 3 April 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Yes, I noticed that. I suppose it wouldn't hurt to combine the Critical and Damage weighting articles, either. Redirecting them all to their base articles would likely be the best option. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Belathus]] 10:27, 2 April 2006 (PDT)		:Yes, I noticed that. I suppose it wouldn't hurt to combine the Critical and Damage weighting articles, either. Redirecting them all to their base articles would likely be the best option. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Belathus]] 10:27, 2 April 2006 (PDT)

			:: If you're saying that [[damage weighting]] and [[critical weighting]] should be on one page, I disagree. They are unique enough in their own right to deserve individual pages, and its important to differentiate between the two. If you're saying there should be a main [[weighting]] page (similar to [[padding]]), which explains in general and links to each individual article, then carry on. SammichKing..[[User:ULTHRIPE\|who?]]..[[User talk:ULTHRIPE\|wha?]] 22:46, 2 April 2006 (PDT)

Maintenance script at 17:27, 2 April 2006

2006-04-02T17:27:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 2 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Just to let you know, there's an article at [[Padded]] that covers several types. You might want to either split it or somehow figure out how to make it work. It also probably should be named [[Padding]] (which is currently a redirect to it), but that's another issue. - [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 10:21, 2 April 2006 (PDT)		Just to let you know, there's an article at [[Padded]] that covers several types. You might want to either split it or somehow figure out how to make it work. It also probably should be named [[Padding]] (which is currently a redirect to it), but that's another issue. - [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 10:21, 2 April 2006 (PDT)

			:Yes, I noticed that. I suppose it wouldn't hurt to combine the Critical and Damage weighting articles, either. Redirecting them all to their base articles would likely be the best option. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Belathus]] 10:27, 2 April 2006 (PDT)

Maintenance script at 17:21, 2 April 2006

2006-04-02T17:21:58Z

New page

Just to let you know, there's an article at [[Padded]] that covers several types. You might want to either split it or somehow figure out how to make it work. It also probably should be named [[Padding]] (which is currently a redirect to it), but that's another issue. - [[User:Ildran|Ildran]] 10:21, 2 April 2006 (PDT)