Talk:Haste (535) - Revision history

VANKRASN39: VANKRASN39 moved page Talk:Haste (506) to Talk:Haste (535): New spell #

2016-01-15T20:13:11Z

VANKRASN39 moved page Talk:Haste (506) to Talk:Haste (535): New spell #

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:13, 15 January 2016
(No difference)

DRAFIX at 22:45, 11 June 2015

2015-06-11T22:45:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 11 June 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:: Yeah, I made an error in my testing and assumed on something I couldn't test (the wizard I was using doesn't have Air Lore). Thanks for the catch :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 18:12, 22 May 2009 (EDT)		:: Yeah, I made an error in my testing and assumed on something I couldn't test (the wizard I was using doesn't have Air Lore). Thanks for the catch :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 18:12, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

	: Here are the raw numbers from a test Tillmen did from rank 0 air lore to 202 - [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10, 10, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 13, 13, 13, 14, 14, 14, 15, 15, 15, 15, 16, 16, 16, 17, 17, 17, 18, 18, 18, 18, 19, 19, 19, 20, 20, 20, 21, 21, 21, 21, 22, 22, 22, 23, 23, 23, 24, 24, 24, 24, 25, 25, 25, 26, 26, 26, 27, 27, 27, 27, 28, 28, 28, 29, 29, 29, 30, 30, 30, 30, 31, 31, 31, 32, 32, 32, 33, 33, 33, 33, 34, 34, 34, 35, 35, 35, 36, 36, 36, 36, 37, 37, 37, 38, 38, 38, 39, 39, 39, 39, 40, 40, 40, 41, 41, 41, 42, 42, 42, 42, 43, 43, 43, 44, 44, 44, 45, 45, 45, 45, 46, 46, 46, 47, 47, 47, 48, 48, 48, 48, 49, 49, 49, 50, 50, 50, 51, 51, 51, 51, 52, 52, 52, 53, 53, 53, 54, 54, 54, 54, 55, 55, 55, 56, 56, 56, 57, 57, 57, 57, 58, 58, 58, 59, 59, 59, 60, 60, 60] [[User:DRAFIX\|Drafix Myalon]]		: Here are the raw numbers from a test Tillmen did from rank 0 air lore to 202 - [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10, 10, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 13, 13, 13, 14, 14, 14, 15, 15, 15, 15, 16, 16, 16, 17, 17, 17, 18, 18, 18, 18, 19, 19, 19, 20, 20, 20, 21, 21, 21, 21, 22, 22, 22, 23, 23, 23, 24, 24, 24, 24, 25, 25, 25, 26, 26, 26, 27, 27, 27, 27, 28, 28, 28, 29, 29, 29, 30, 30, 30, 30, 31, 31, 31, 32, 32, 32, 33, 33, 33, 33, 34, 34, 34, 35, 35, 35, 36, 36, 36, 36, 37, 37, 37, 38, 38, 38, 39, 39, 39, 39, 40, 40, 40, 41, 41, 41, 42, 42, 42, 42, 43, 43, 43, 44, 44, 44, 45, 45, 45, 45, 46, 46, 46, 47, 47, 47, 48, 48, 48, 48, 49, 49, 49, 50, 50, 50, 51, 51, 51, 51, 52, 52, 52, 53, 53, 53, 54, 54, 54, 54, 55, 55, 55, 56, 56, 56, 57, 57, 57, 57, 58, 58, 58, 59, 59, 59, 60, 60, 60] [[User:DRAFIX\|Drafix Myalon]] 15:45, 11 June 2015 (PST)

DRAFIX at 22:44, 11 June 2015

2015-06-11T22:44:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 11 June 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:: Yeah, I made an error in my testing and assumed on something I couldn't test (the wizard I was using doesn't have Air Lore). Thanks for the catch :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 18:12, 22 May 2009 (EDT)		:: Yeah, I made an error in my testing and assumed on something I couldn't test (the wizard I was using doesn't have Air Lore). Thanks for the catch :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 18:12, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

	: Here are the raw numbers from a test Tillmen did from rank 0 air lore to 202 - [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10, 10, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 13, 13, 13, 14, 14, 14, 15, 15, 15, 15, 16, 16, 16, 17, 17, 17, 18, 18, 18, 18, 19, 19, 19, 20, 20, 20, 21, 21, 21, 21, 22, 22, 22, 23, 23, 23, 24, 24, 24, 24, 25, 25, 25, 26, 26, 26, 27, 27, 27, 27, 28, 28, 28, 29, 29, 29, 30, 30, 30, 30, 31, 31, 31, 32, 32, 32, 33, 33, 33, 33, 34, 34, 34, 35, 35, 35, 36, 36, 36, 36, 37, 37, 37, 38, 38, 38, 39, 39, 39, 39, 40, 40, 40, 41, 41, 41, 42, 42, 42, 42, 43, 43, 43, 44, 44, 44, 45, 45, 45, 45, 46, 46, 46, 47, 47, 47, 48, 48, 48, 48, 49, 49, 49, 50, 50, 50, 51, 51, 51, 51, 52, 52, 52, 53, 53, 53, 54, 54, 54, 54, 55, 55, 55, 56, 56, 56, 57, 57, 57, 57, 58, 58, 58, 59, 59, 59, 60, 60, 60]		: Here are the raw numbers from a test Tillmen did from rank 0 air lore to 202 - [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10, 10, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 13, 13, 13, 14, 14, 14, 15, 15, 15, 15, 16, 16, 16, 17, 17, 17, 18, 18, 18, 18, 19, 19, 19, 20, 20, 20, 21, 21, 21, 21, 22, 22, 22, 23, 23, 23, 24, 24, 24, 24, 25, 25, 25, 26, 26, 26, 27, 27, 27, 27, 28, 28, 28, 29, 29, 29, 30, 30, 30, 30, 31, 31, 31, 32, 32, 32, 33, 33, 33, 33, 34, 34, 34, 35, 35, 35, 36, 36, 36, 36, 37, 37, 37, 38, 38, 38, 39, 39, 39, 39, 40, 40, 40, 41, 41, 41, 42, 42, 42, 42, 43, 43, 43, 44, 44, 44, 45, 45, 45, 45, 46, 46, 46, 47, 47, 47, 48, 48, 48, 48, 49, 49, 49, 50, 50, 50, 51, 51, 51, 51, 52, 52, 52, 53, 53, 53, 54, 54, 54, 54, 55, 55, 55, 56, 56, 56, 57, 57, 57, 57, 58, 58, 58, 59, 59, 59, 60, 60, 60] [[User:DRAFIX\|Drafix Myalon]]

DRAFIX at 22:43, 11 June 2015

2015-06-11T22:43:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 11 June 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:: Yeah, I made an error in my testing and assumed on something I couldn't test (the wizard I was using doesn't have Air Lore). Thanks for the catch :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 18:12, 22 May 2009 (EDT)		:: Yeah, I made an error in my testing and assumed on something I couldn't test (the wizard I was using doesn't have Air Lore). Thanks for the catch :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 18:12, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

			: Here are the raw numbers from a test Tillmen did from rank 0 air lore to 202 - [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10, 10, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 13, 13, 13, 14, 14, 14, 15, 15, 15, 15, 16, 16, 16, 17, 17, 17, 18, 18, 18, 18, 19, 19, 19, 20, 20, 20, 21, 21, 21, 21, 22, 22, 22, 23, 23, 23, 24, 24, 24, 24, 25, 25, 25, 26, 26, 26, 27, 27, 27, 27, 28, 28, 28, 29, 29, 29, 30, 30, 30, 30, 31, 31, 31, 32, 32, 32, 33, 33, 33, 33, 34, 34, 34, 35, 35, 35, 36, 36, 36, 36, 37, 37, 37, 38, 38, 38, 39, 39, 39, 39, 40, 40, 40, 41, 41, 41, 42, 42, 42, 42, 43, 43, 43, 44, 44, 44, 45, 45, 45, 45, 46, 46, 46, 47, 47, 47, 48, 48, 48, 48, 49, 49, 49, 50, 50, 50, 51, 51, 51, 51, 52, 52, 52, 53, 53, 53, 54, 54, 54, 54, 55, 55, 55, 56, 56, 56, 57, 57, 57, 57, 58, 58, 58, 59, 59, 59, 60, 60, 60]

GS4-KEIOS: 5 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:23Z

5 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

WINTERDAWN at 22:12, 22 May 2009

2009-05-22T22:12:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 22 May 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:

	: Went ahead and made the changes necessary. And actually it isn't a straight ((RT - 1) * .75), since non-Wizards could still qualify for the Air Lore bonus. [[User:GREYCROISSANT\|GREYCROISSANT]] 11:40, 17 April 2009 (EDT)		: Went ahead and made the changes necessary. And actually it isn't a straight ((RT - 1) * .75), since non-Wizards could still qualify for the Air Lore bonus. [[User:GREYCROISSANT\|GREYCROISSANT]] 11:40, 17 April 2009 (EDT)

			:: Yeah, I made an error in my testing and assumed on something I couldn't test (the wizard I was using doesn't have Air Lore). Thanks for the catch :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 18:12, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 15:40, 17 April 2009

2009-04-17T15:40:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:40, 17 April 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:

	: Actually, if you think about it more, it makes sense that it works that way (IE: an imbed). So maybe the clarification isn't needed. [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 15:29, 16 April 2009 (EDT)		: Actually, if you think about it more, it makes sense that it works that way (IE: an imbed). So maybe the clarification isn't needed. [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 15:29, 16 April 2009 (EDT)

			: Went ahead and made the changes necessary. And actually it isn't a straight ((RT - 1) * .75), since non-Wizards could still qualify for the Air Lore bonus. [[User:GREYCROISSANT\|GREYCROISSANT]] 11:40, 17 April 2009 (EDT)

WINTERDAWN at 19:29, 16 April 2009

2009-04-16T19:29:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 16 April 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I don't know how to make 'breaks' between stuff. A BIG note to add, that I just found out, is that the formula is used on whoever is benefitting from haste (so a non-wizard will not get ANY bonus and it's a straight ((RT - 1) * .75). I'll add this, but if someone could make it cleaner? :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 15:17, 16 April 2009 (EDT)		I don't know how to make 'breaks' between stuff. A BIG note to add, that I just found out, is that the formula is used on whoever is benefitting from haste (so a non-wizard will not get ANY bonus and it's a straight ((RT - 1) * .75). I'll add this, but if someone could make it cleaner? :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 15:17, 16 April 2009 (EDT)

			: Actually, if you think about it more, it makes sense that it works that way (IE: an imbed). So maybe the clarification isn't needed. [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 15:29, 16 April 2009 (EDT)

WINTERDAWN at 19:17, 16 April 2009

2009-04-16T19:17:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 16 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Yay, Haste Formula! I was wondering if it was ari to thank some mage's hat for the formula here, since I'm not supposed to include credits in the actual article. shrug? [[User:DOOMDUCK\|Doom Duck]] 15:30, 19 January 2006 (PST)		Yay, Haste Formula! I was wondering if it was ari to thank some mage's hat for the formula here, since I'm not supposed to include credits in the actual article. shrug? [[User:DOOMDUCK\|Doom Duck]] 15:30, 19 January 2006 (PST)
	: You can thank whoever you want in the talk space, that's for sure. You could mention that he came up with the formula in the article as well, if you wanted. The idea is that facts should be in there, but not opinions. He being the one that developed the formula would be a fact, him being a great guy because of it would be an opinion. So something like "The roundtime reduction appears to follow the following formula, due to Joe Bob Johnson" would be just fine. - [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 18:36, 19 January 2006 (PST)		: You can thank whoever you want in the talk space, that's for sure. You could mention that he came up with the formula in the article as well, if you wanted. The idea is that facts should be in there, but not opinions. He being the one that developed the formula would be a fact, him being a great guy because of it would be an opinion. So something like "The roundtime reduction appears to follow the following formula, due to Joe Bob Johnson" would be just fine. - [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 18:36, 19 January 2006 (PST)

			I don't know how to make 'breaks' between stuff. A BIG note to add, that I just found out, is that the formula is used on whoever is benefitting from haste (so a non-wizard will not get ANY bonus and it's a straight ((RT - 1) * .75). I'll add this, but if someone could make it cleaner? :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 15:17, 16 April 2009 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 02:36, 20 January 2006

2006-01-20T02:36:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 19 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Yay, Haste Formula! I was wondering if it was ari to thank some mage's hat for the formula here, since I'm not supposed to include credits in the actual article. shrug? [[User:DOOMDUCK\|Doom Duck]] 15:30, 19 January 2006 (PST)		Yay, Haste Formula! I was wondering if it was ari to thank some mage's hat for the formula here, since I'm not supposed to include credits in the actual article. shrug? [[User:DOOMDUCK\|Doom Duck]] 15:30, 19 January 2006 (PST)
			: You can thank whoever you want in the talk space, that's for sure. You could mention that he came up with the formula in the article as well, if you wanted. The idea is that facts should be in there, but not opinions. He being the one that developed the formula would be a fact, him being a great guy because of it would be an opinion. So something like "The roundtime reduction appears to follow the following formula, due to Joe Bob Johnson" would be just fine. - [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 18:36, 19 January 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 16 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Yay, Haste Formula! I was wondering if it was ari to thank some mage's hat for the formula here, since I'm not supposed to include credits in the actual article. shrug? [[User:DOOMDUCK\|Doom Duck]] 15:30, 19 January 2006 (PST)		Yay, Haste Formula! I was wondering if it was ari to thank some mage's hat for the formula here, since I'm not supposed to include credits in the actual article. shrug? [[User:DOOMDUCK\|Doom Duck]] 15:30, 19 January 2006 (PST)
	: You can thank whoever you want in the talk space, that's for sure. You could mention that he came up with the formula in the article as well, if you wanted. The idea is that facts should be in there, but not opinions. He being the one that developed the formula would be a fact, him being a great guy because of it would be an opinion. So something like "The roundtime reduction appears to follow the following formula, due to Joe Bob Johnson" would be just fine. - [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 18:36, 19 January 2006 (PST)		: You can thank whoever you want in the talk space, that's for sure. You could mention that he came up with the formula in the article as well, if you wanted. The idea is that facts should be in there, but not opinions. He being the one that developed the formula would be a fact, him being a great guy because of it would be an opinion. So something like "The roundtime reduction appears to follow the following formula, due to Joe Bob Johnson" would be just fine. - [[User:Ildran\|Ildran]] 18:36, 19 January 2006 (PST)

			I don't know how to make 'breaks' between stuff. A BIG note to add, that I just found out, is that the formula is used on whoever is benefitting from haste (so a non-wizard will not get ANY bonus and it's a straight ((RT - 1) * .75). I'll add this, but if someone could make it cleaner? :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|Arianiss Winterfox]] 15:17, 16 April 2009 (EDT)