Talk:List of alchemy formulas - Revision history

VANKRASN39: /* General Alchemy Levels? */ more

2017-09-15T14:40:17Z

General Alchemy Levels?: more

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 15 September 2017
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Also, this recipe list is only directly linked on the Alchemy page once. In the final step of a recipe, under ALCHEMY SEAL.		Also, this recipe list is only directly linked on the Alchemy page once. In the final step of a recipe, under ALCHEMY SEAL.

	:Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. The ranks are broken down like that because (1) it needed to be broken down in some manner, and (2) those are the ranks at which one learns new skills (Extract, Infuse, and Refract). Since all Refract recipes will take you to master, and it did not need to be broken down after only 5 more ranks for Channel. In terms of sorting by final rank, unfortunately the GMs did not make the ending ranks uniform. On the Alchemy page, the list is also linked on the navigation box at the bottom of the page. If you see a page in a navigation box, it is important to that topic. If one cannot read the header columns in each part of the table, and the end rank on every recipe page, I cannot help that. If you feel it needs a note at the top, I'm not opposed. Also, in some cases, hitting those thresholds should dictate the way they do alchemy, as not switching to essence shards for tough recipes/infuse from 30-34 is a huge mistake. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 09:00, 15 September 2017 (CDT)		:Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. The ranks are broken down like that because (1) it needed to be broken down in some manner, and (2) those are the ranks at which one learns new skills (Extract, Infuse, and Refract). Since all Refract recipes will take you to master, and it did not need to be broken down after only 5 more ranks for Channel. In terms of sorting by final rank, unfortunately the GMs did not make the ending ranks uniform. On the Alchemy page, the list is also linked on the navigation box at the bottom of the page. If you see a page in a navigation box, it is important to that topic. If one cannot read the header columns in each part of the table, and the end rank on every recipe page, I cannot help that. If you feel it needs a note at the top, I'm not opposed. Also, in some cases, hitting those thresholds should dictate the way they do alchemy, as not switching to essence shards for tough recipes/infuse from 30-34 is a huge mistake. The breakdown is also consistent with every category listing (e.g. [[empath trinkets]]). [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 09:00, 15 September 2017 (CDT)

VANKRASN39: /* General Alchemy Levels? */ more re essence shards

2017-09-15T14:17:52Z

General Alchemy Levels?: more re essence shards

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 15 September 2017
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Also, this recipe list is only directly linked on the Alchemy page once. In the final step of a recipe, under ALCHEMY SEAL.		Also, this recipe list is only directly linked on the Alchemy page once. In the final step of a recipe, under ALCHEMY SEAL.

	:Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. The ranks are broken down like that because (1) it needed to be broken down in some manner, and (2) those are the ranks at which one learns new skills (Extract, Infuse, and Refract). Since all Refract recipes will take you to master, and it did not need to be broken down after only 5 more ranks for Channel. In terms of sorting by final rank, unfortunately the GMs did not make the ending ranks uniform. On the Alchemy page, the list is also linked on the navigation box at the bottom of the page. If you see a page in a navigation box, it is important to that topic. If one cannot read the header columns in each part of the table, and the end rank on every recipe page, I cannot help that. If you feel it needs a note at the top, I'm not opposed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 09:00, 15 September 2017 (CDT)		:Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. The ranks are broken down like that because (1) it needed to be broken down in some manner, and (2) those are the ranks at which one learns new skills (Extract, Infuse, and Refract). Since all Refract recipes will take you to master, and it did not need to be broken down after only 5 more ranks for Channel. In terms of sorting by final rank, unfortunately the GMs did not make the ending ranks uniform. On the Alchemy page, the list is also linked on the navigation box at the bottom of the page. If you see a page in a navigation box, it is important to that topic. If one cannot read the header columns in each part of the table, and the end rank on every recipe page, I cannot help that. If you feel it needs a note at the top, I'm not opposed. Also, in some cases, hitting those thresholds should dictate the way they do alchemy, as not switching to essence shards for tough recipes/infuse from 30-34 is a huge mistake. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 09:00, 15 September 2017 (CDT)

VANKRASN39: /* General Alchemy Levels? */ response

2017-09-15T14:00:51Z

General Alchemy Levels?: response

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:00, 15 September 2017
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Also, this recipe list is only directly linked on the Alchemy page once. In the final step of a recipe, under ALCHEMY SEAL.		Also, this recipe list is only directly linked on the Alchemy page once. In the final step of a recipe, under ALCHEMY SEAL.

			:Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. The ranks are broken down like that because (1) it needed to be broken down in some manner, and (2) those are the ranks at which one learns new skills (Extract, Infuse, and Refract). Since all Refract recipes will take you to master, and it did not need to be broken down after only 5 more ranks for Channel. In terms of sorting by final rank, unfortunately the GMs did not make the ending ranks uniform. On the Alchemy page, the list is also linked on the navigation box at the bottom of the page. If you see a page in a navigation box, it is important to that topic. If one cannot read the header columns in each part of the table, and the end rank on every recipe page, I cannot help that. If you feel it needs a note at the top, I'm not opposed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 09:00, 15 September 2017 (CDT)

CHADDEAUX: /* General Alchemy Levels? */ new section

2017-09-15T13:12:29Z

General Alchemy Levels?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 15 September 2017
Line 21:		Line 21:

	:I've completed what I set out to do. The main tables should be easier to edit now. Also added sorting to the Potions and Trinkets tables. I did not feel that it was necessary to add color-coding to the professions columns, as there are only four professions involved at the moment. I mainly left the Matrix tables alone, as editing really hasn't been an issue with those. The spacing on the editing page is a bit messy now - it didn't strike me as overly important, but let me know if it's a hindrance. [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 10:03, 20 August 2011 (EDT)		:I've completed what I set out to do. The main tables should be easier to edit now. Also added sorting to the Potions and Trinkets tables. I did not feel that it was necessary to add color-coding to the professions columns, as there are only four professions involved at the moment. I mainly left the Matrix tables alone, as editing really hasn't been an issue with those. The spacing on the editing page is a bit messy now - it didn't strike me as overly important, but let me know if it's a hindrance. [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 10:03, 20 August 2011 (EDT)

			== General Alchemy Levels? ==

			The way General Alchemy is broken down into levels may be confusing for new alchemists. For instance, tincture of torban is listed from levels 1-14, but you can actually make this tincture until rank 25. While it is learned at level 13, it isn't the only level you can make it. If I were new to alchemy, looking at the levels, I would think 1-14 meant at 14, I need to start looking at the 15-29 list.

			Also, this recipe list is only directly linked on the Alchemy page once. In the final step of a recipe, under ALCHEMY SEAL.

GS4-KEIOS: 9 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:23Z

9 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision

Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014

Maintenance script at 14:03, 20 August 2011

2011-08-20T14:03:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 20 August 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	== Clean-up ==		== Clean-up ==

	I'm considering cleaning up this page. This might include:		I'm considering cleaning up this page. This might include:<br>
		⚫	Making the tables simpler to edit<br>
		⚫	Removing the two-tone rows, taking into consideration that recipes are still being added, etc.<br>
		⚫	Removing the xx, leaving an empty space instead.<br>
		⚫	Removing the Est. Cost/Sell column<br>
		⚫	Input? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:11, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

		⚫	Wasn't really considering adding any color here, but it looks like the Potions and Trinkets tables would benefit both from sorting (professions and spell number) and color-coding the professions column. Thoughts? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:29, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
⚫	Making the tables simpler to edit

			:I've completed what I set out to do. The main tables should be easier to edit now. Also added sorting to the Potions and Trinkets tables. I did not feel that it was necessary to add color-coding to the professions columns, as there are only four professions involved at the moment. I mainly left the Matrix tables alone, as editing really hasn't been an issue with those. The spacing on the editing page is a bit messy now - it didn't strike me as overly important, but let me know if it's a hindrance. [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 10:03, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
⚫	Removing the two-tone rows, taking into consideration that recipes are still being added, etc.

⚫	Removing the xx, leaving an empty space instead.

⚫	Removing the Est. Cost/Sell column

⚫	Input? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:11, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

⚫	Wasn't really considering adding any color here, but it looks like the Potions and Trinkets tables would benefit both from sorting (professions and spell number) and color-coding the professions column. Thoughts? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:29, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 01:29, 12 August 2011

2011-08-12T01:29:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 11 August 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Input? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:11, 11 August 2011 (EDT)		Input? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:11, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

			Wasn't really considering adding any color here, but it looks like the Potions and Trinkets tables would benefit both from sorting (professions and spell number) and color-coding the professions column. Thoughts? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:29, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 01:12, 12 August 2011

2011-08-12T01:12:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 11 August 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Removing the xx, leaving an empty space instead.		Removing the xx, leaving an empty space instead.

	Removing the Est: Cost/Sell column		Removing the Est. Cost/Sell column

	Input? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:11, 11 August 2011 (EDT)		Input? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:11, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 01:11, 12 August 2011

2011-08-12T01:11:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 11 August 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:

	: That sounds like a great idea to me. They can always be added back later if it so happens that the semi's can start learning alchemy too. [[User:DRIZZT-12\|Adam]] <sup>[[User talk:DRIZZT-12\|talk]]</sup> 22:44, 16 June 2008 (EDT)		: That sounds like a great idea to me. They can always be added back later if it so happens that the semi's can start learning alchemy too. [[User:DRIZZT-12\|Adam]] <sup>[[User talk:DRIZZT-12\|talk]]</sup> 22:44, 16 June 2008 (EDT)

			== Clean-up ==

			I'm considering cleaning up this page. This might include:

			Making the tables simpler to edit

			Removing the two-tone rows, taking into consideration that recipes are still being added, etc.

			Removing the xx, leaving an empty space instead.

			Removing the Est: Cost/Sell column

			Input? [[User:KAGE\|KAGE]] 21:11, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

MILQUETOAST: Talk:List of alchemy recipes moved to Talk:List of alchemy formulas: After discussion, it was decided that the alchemists would rather see "formula" over "recipe", and there was much hatred toward referring to the formulas as recipes

2009-05-20T12:05:38Z

Talk:List of alchemy recipes moved to Talk:List of alchemy formulas: After discussion, it was decided that the alchemists would rather see "formula" over "recipe", and there was much hatred toward referring to the formulas as recipes

← Older revision

Revision as of 07:05, 20 May 2009