<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://gswiki.play.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3APatron%27s_Blessing_%281611%29</id>
	<title>Talk:Patron&#039;s Blessing (1611) - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://gswiki.play.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3APatron%27s_Blessing_%281611%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gswiki.play.net/index.php?title=Talk:Patron%27s_Blessing_(1611)&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-28T06:59:46Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.12</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gswiki.play.net/index.php?title=Talk:Patron%27s_Blessing_(1611)&amp;diff=158321&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>CLTIDBALL: Question re: defensive/offensive tag for this spell on the Paladin Spell List sidebar/template.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gswiki.play.net/index.php?title=Talk:Patron%27s_Blessing_(1611)&amp;diff=158321&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2022-01-15T04:03:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Question re: defensive/offensive tag for this spell on the Paladin Spell List sidebar/template.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Does it make sense to tag this spell as Offensive (with yellow background) versus its current Defensive (with green background)?&lt;br /&gt;
*Argument for keeping it tagged as defensive: the effective-CM ranks are good for CML and SMR(v2) defense.&lt;br /&gt;
*Argument for tagging it as offensive:  the effective-CM ranks count towards CML and Attack Strength offensive.&lt;br /&gt;
What says the rest of the GSWiki hivemind (if anyone has any opinions)? [[User:CLTIDBALL|CLTIDBALL]] ([[User talk:CLTIDBALL|talk]]) 22:03, 14 January 2022 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CLTIDBALL</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>