Talk:Redux - Revision history

HJELTE: /* May 2021 Rewrite */ new section

2021-05-27T01:05:18Z

May 2021 Rewrite: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 26 May 2021
Line 80:		Line 80:

	:The wiki manager is aware that equations are not displaying properly. I have passed along your comment in case someone would like to respond; I do not have information to do so. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 11:48, 11 July 2020 (CDT)		:The wiki manager is aware that equations are not displaying properly. I have passed along your comment in case someone would like to respond; I do not have information to do so. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 11:48, 11 July 2020 (CDT)

			== May 2021 Rewrite ==

			This is based on in depth discussion with Naijin, the HEALTH verb, and work between Whirlin and Riltus. It has been blessed by Naijin, and modeled externally to confirm accuracy with the system. -Whirlin --[[User:HJELTE\|HJELTE]] ([[User talk:HJELTE\|talk]]) 20:05, 26 May 2021 (CDT)

MOD-GSMOTTE: Responding regarding equation.

2020-07-11T16:48:25Z

Responding regarding equation.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 11 July 2020
Line 78:		Line 78:

	The equations are all broken. "Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathrm{1060 + \frac{2000}{level}}}" is rather hard ot understand. [[User:GEHAYI\|GEHAYI]] ([[User talk:GEHAYI\|talk]]) 22:58, 9 July 2020 (CDT)		The equations are all broken. "Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathrm{1060 + \frac{2000}{level}}}" is rather hard ot understand. [[User:GEHAYI\|GEHAYI]] ([[User talk:GEHAYI\|talk]]) 22:58, 9 July 2020 (CDT)

			:The wiki manager is aware that equations are not displaying properly. I have passed along your comment in case someone would like to respond; I do not have information to do so. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 11:48, 11 July 2020 (CDT)

GEHAYI: /* = Could someone please fix the math? */

2020-07-10T03:59:11Z

= Could someone please fix the math?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 9 July 2020
Line 75:		Line 75:


	== Could someone please fix the math? =		= Could someone please fix the math? =

	The equations are all broken. "Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathrm{1060 + \frac{2000}{level}}}" is rather hard ot understand. [[User:GEHAYI\|GEHAYI]] ([[User talk:GEHAYI\|talk]]) 22:58, 9 July 2020 (CDT)		The equations are all broken. "Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathrm{1060 + \frac{2000}{level}}}" is rather hard ot understand. [[User:GEHAYI\|GEHAYI]] ([[User talk:GEHAYI\|talk]]) 22:58, 9 July 2020 (CDT)

GEHAYI at 03:58, 10 July 2020

2020-07-10T03:58:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:58, 9 July 2020
Line 73:		Line 73:
	:::Mark says: "Both formulas are correct but Whirlin's is a simplified version and it's the one that I would normally use. The reason I opted for an expanded format was to give the reader, IMO, an easier conceptualization of how the redux factor is applied to damage reduction but I have no objection to replacing it."		:::Mark says: "Both formulas are correct but Whirlin's is a simplified version and it's the one that I would normally use. The reason I opted for an expanded format was to give the reader, IMO, an easier conceptualization of how the redux factor is applied to damage reduction but I have no objection to replacing it."
	:::I'll leave it up to consensus if others want to chime in. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:38, 18 September 2016 (CDT)		:::I'll leave it up to consensus if others want to chime in. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:38, 18 September 2016 (CDT)


			== Could someone please fix the math? =

			The equations are all broken. "Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://api.formulasearchengine.com/v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathrm{1060 + \frac{2000}{level}}}" is rather hard ot understand. [[User:GEHAYI\|GEHAYI]] ([[User talk:GEHAYI\|talk]]) 22:58, 9 July 2020 (CDT)

VANKRASN39: /* Proposed Revision to equation */ response

2016-09-18T16:38:20Z

Proposed Revision to equation: response

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:38, 18 September 2016
Line 68:		Line 68:

	:I'll bring it to Mark. I have more revisions from him to do when I haven't been playing since 8 am. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:57, 17 September 2016 (CDT)		:I'll bring it to Mark. I have more revisions from him to do when I haven't been playing since 8 am. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:57, 17 September 2016 (CDT)


	::Sounds good, thanks Allereli. I may just whip up a quick spreadsheet or something to Calc Redux based on the latest Mark Calculations. I made a couple spreadsheets to evaluate redux on the threads that I'm sure you're reading. --[[User:HJELTE\|HJELTE]] ([[User talk:HJELTE\|talk]]) 10:11, 18 September 2016 (CDT)		::Sounds good, thanks Allereli. I may just whip up a quick spreadsheet or something to Calc Redux based on the latest Mark Calculations. I made a couple spreadsheets to evaluate redux on the threads that I'm sure you're reading. --[[User:HJELTE\|HJELTE]] ([[User talk:HJELTE\|talk]]) 10:11, 18 September 2016 (CDT)

			:::Mark says: "Both formulas are correct but Whirlin's is a simplified version and it's the one that I would normally use. The reason I opted for an expanded format was to give the reader, IMO, an easier conceptualization of how the redux factor is applied to damage reduction but I have no objection to replacing it."
			:::I'll leave it up to consensus if others want to chime in. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:38, 18 September 2016 (CDT)

HJELTE: /* Proposed Revision to equation */

2016-09-18T15:11:38Z

Proposed Revision to equation

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:11, 18 September 2016
Line 68:		Line 68:

	:I'll bring it to Mark. I have more revisions from him to do when I haven't been playing since 8 am. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:57, 17 September 2016 (CDT)		:I'll bring it to Mark. I have more revisions from him to do when I haven't been playing since 8 am. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:57, 17 September 2016 (CDT)


			::Sounds good, thanks Allereli. I may just whip up a quick spreadsheet or something to Calc Redux based on the latest Mark Calculations. I made a couple spreadsheets to evaluate redux on the threads that I'm sure you're reading. --[[User:HJELTE\|HJELTE]] ([[User talk:HJELTE\|talk]]) 10:11, 18 September 2016 (CDT)

VANKRASN39: /* Proposed Revision to equation */ response

2016-09-18T04:57:44Z

Proposed Revision to equation: response

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 17 September 2016
Line 66:		Line 66:

	Easier to follow		Easier to follow

			:I'll bring it to Mark. I have more revisions from him to do when I haven't been playing since 8 am. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:57, 17 September 2016 (CDT)

HJELTE: /* Proposed Revision to equation */ new section

2016-09-18T04:51:40Z

Proposed Revision to equation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 17 September 2016
Line 55:		Line 55:

	[[User:HOFMANNM1\|HOFMANNM1]] 22:49, 14 September 2007 (EDT)		[[User:HOFMANNM1\|HOFMANNM1]] 22:49, 14 September 2007 (EDT)

			== Proposed Revision to equation ==

			In Order of Operations, Part 1:

			Total damage taken = (reduced raw damage + crit damage) - trunc((redux factor *(reduced raw dmg + crit dmg))

			Proposed Changing to:
			Total damage taken = Ceiling( (1 - Redux Factor) * (Reduced Raw Damage + Crit Damage))

			Easier to follow

GS4-KEIOS: 5 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:28Z

5 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 02:49, 15 September 2007

2007-09-15T02:49:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 14 September 2007
Line 53:		Line 53:

	It would take a really long time to get up to 50 samples for the outlier bins, so I'm ok with saying that this is how CDR impacts RF. For each hundredth away from the average CDR, the observed RF goes in the opposite direction from its baseline by 2.5 thousandths.		It would take a really long time to get up to 50 samples for the outlier bins, so I'm ok with saying that this is how CDR impacts RF. For each hundredth away from the average CDR, the observed RF goes in the opposite direction from its baseline by 2.5 thousandths.

			[[User:HOFMANNM1\|HOFMANNM1]] 22:49, 14 September 2007 (EDT)