Talk:Roundtime - Revision history

VANKRASN39: remove broken links

2015-03-17T19:55:12Z

remove broken links

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 17 March 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:

	== Old topic ==		== Old topic ==
	You know, I really dislike this "AGIDEX" term that popped up all of a sudden. It seems... you know, pointless. We all know that roundtime reduction is the result of the sum of agility and dexterity bonuses. There are a lot of things that are based off the sum of two or more ability scores, yet we don't make terms to denote that, such as with the [[INFSTR]] article (which is clearly poking fun at the [[AGIDEX]] article via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum reductio ad absurdum]). Please don't tell me we're going to have to make pages involving other factors such as STRCON (for encumbrance calculations), STRDEX (which is used to calculate DS with Parry defense and Shield defense, and also determines the maximum AS possible from the off-hand when using [[Two Weapon Combat]]), AGIINT (for DS calculations involving the [[Dodging]] skill), and LOGINT (for the maximum experience pool size). That's just silly, if you ask me. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 18:59, 17 August 2006 (EDT)		You know, I really dislike this "AGIDEX" term that popped up all of a sudden. It seems... you know, pointless. We all know that roundtime reduction is the result of the sum of agility and dexterity bonuses. There are a lot of things that are based off the sum of two or more ability scores, yet we don't make terms to denote that, such as with the '''INFSTR''' article (which is clearly poking fun at the [[AGIDEX]] article via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum reductio ad absurdum]). Please don't tell me we're going to have to make pages involving other factors such as STRCON (for encumbrance calculations), STRDEX (which is used to calculate DS with Parry defense and Shield defense, and also determines the maximum AS possible from the off-hand when using [[Two Weapon Combat]]), AGIINT (for DS calculations involving the [[Dodging]] skill), and LOGINT (for the maximum experience pool size). That's just silly, if you ask me. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 18:59, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

	:I don't much care either way, but the term AGIDEX has been used for as long as I can remember. I've never heard any of those other acronyms before. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]		:I don't much care either way, but the term AGIDEX has been used for as long as I can remember. I've never heard any of those other acronyms before. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Nah, we can just leave it the way it is. It's fine that way. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 20:22, 17 August 2006 (EDT)		Nah, we can just leave it the way it is. It's fine that way. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 20:22, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

	:I vote please. For the love of god, please. Let's delete AGIDEX, redirect it to RT, but then (here's where things get exciting) not mention AGIDEX. To me this seems like the second silliest thing you could make a KP page (for #1, ~~[[INFSTR\|~~see here]]). The fact that an editor went to the trouble of then taking this page with absolutely 0 un-duplicated or useful content, made it into a template, and then put that template into this page just blows my mind. Like, it really causes my head to hurt when I think about why someone would have been motivated to do that. Why would you take a table of values that is set in stone and should only only only ever appear once and move it to a template page? I'm beginning to think this whole AGIDEX thing is some elaborate hoax to make me sad. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 22:45, 17 August 2006 (EDT)		:I vote please. For the love of god, please. Let's delete AGIDEX, redirect it to RT, but then (here's where things get exciting) not mention AGIDEX. To me this seems like the second silliest thing you could make a KP page (for #1, '''see here'''). The fact that an editor went to the trouble of then taking this page with absolutely 0 un-duplicated or useful content, made it into a template, and then put that template into this page just blows my mind. Like, it really causes my head to hurt when I think about why someone would have been motivated to do that. Why would you take a table of values that is set in stone and should only only only ever appear once and move it to a template page? I'm beginning to think this whole AGIDEX thing is some elaborate hoax to make me sad. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 22:45, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

	::Well, I figure that if the Martians love AGIDEX, then we should too. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]		::Well, I figure that if the Martians love AGIDEX, then we should too. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]

GS4-KEIOS: 13 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:28Z

13 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script: /* Old topic */

2006-08-18T23:16:28Z

Old topic

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 18 August 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:

	:Just think of us (those of us that hang out in the IRC room anymore and basically just sit around and chat about KP and stuff) like the Pre-Cogs of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_Report_(film) Minority Report]. We're special, need extra care, and are easily distressed. A small price to pay, really, for our awesomeness. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 14:59, 18 August 2006 (EDT)		:Just think of us (those of us that hang out in the IRC room anymore and basically just sit around and chat about KP and stuff) like the Pre-Cogs of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_Report_(film) Minority Report]. We're special, need extra care, and are easily distressed. A small price to pay, really, for our awesomeness. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 14:59, 18 August 2006 (EDT)

			::I created a template for it, because, at the time, the table was in both AGIDEX and Roundtime. I figure it's also useful for articles talking reducing ambush roundtime, or other such jazz. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]

Maintenance script at 18:59, 18 August 2006

2006-08-18T18:59:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 18 August 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:

	I don't see why the existance of any article on KP should frustrate or distress anyone. It's just another piece of information. The term AGIDEX has been used for as long as I can remember there ever being discussion about reduction of combat roundtime, which has been years at this point. I do have to admit that I'm a bit curious as to why a template was made for the table as well, as I doubt it'll ever be included on any other page. - [[User:Anshou\|Oliver]] <sup>[[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]</sup> 14:10, 18 August 2006 (EDT)		I don't see why the existance of any article on KP should frustrate or distress anyone. It's just another piece of information. The term AGIDEX has been used for as long as I can remember there ever being discussion about reduction of combat roundtime, which has been years at this point. I do have to admit that I'm a bit curious as to why a template was made for the table as well, as I doubt it'll ever be included on any other page. - [[User:Anshou\|Oliver]] <sup>[[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]</sup> 14:10, 18 August 2006 (EDT)

			:Just think of us (those of us that hang out in the IRC room anymore and basically just sit around and chat about KP and stuff) like the Pre-Cogs of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_Report_(film) Minority Report]. We're special, need extra care, and are easily distressed. A small price to pay, really, for our awesomeness. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 14:59, 18 August 2006 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 18:10, 18 August 2006

2006-08-18T18:10:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 18 August 2006
Line 20:		Line 20:

	::::Sounds like somebody needs a booster probing. ;) -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]		::::Sounds like somebody needs a booster probing. ;) -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]

			I don't see why the existance of any article on KP should frustrate or distress anyone. It's just another piece of information. The term AGIDEX has been used for as long as I can remember there ever being discussion about reduction of combat roundtime, which has been years at this point. I do have to admit that I'm a bit curious as to why a template was made for the table as well, as I doubt it'll ever be included on any other page. - [[User:Anshou\|Oliver]] <sup>[[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]</sup> 14:10, 18 August 2006 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 15:18, 18 August 2006

2006-08-18T15:18:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:18, 18 August 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Topic Change ==
			Okay, something else to discuss: Granted, a combined ability bonus of higher than +75 isn't possible for any base race, but with the aid of enhancive items, we could actually get an increase of +40 more (+20 to each, agility and dexterity). Given this fact, we could see a bonus of as high as +115. Don't you think that we'll see higher RT reductions at, say, +83 and +98? Even possibly +113? We'll likely see roundtime reductions of -6, -7, and -8 at these points, don't you think? -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 11:18, 18 August 2006 (EDT)

			== Old topic ==
	You know, I really dislike this "AGIDEX" term that popped up all of a sudden. It seems... you know, pointless. We all know that roundtime reduction is the result of the sum of agility and dexterity bonuses. There are a lot of things that are based off the sum of two or more ability scores, yet we don't make terms to denote that, such as with the [[INFSTR]] article (which is clearly poking fun at the [[AGIDEX]] article via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum reductio ad absurdum]). Please don't tell me we're going to have to make pages involving other factors such as STRCON (for encumbrance calculations), STRDEX (which is used to calculate DS with Parry defense and Shield defense, and also determines the maximum AS possible from the off-hand when using [[Two Weapon Combat]]), AGIINT (for DS calculations involving the [[Dodging]] skill), and LOGINT (for the maximum experience pool size). That's just silly, if you ask me. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 18:59, 17 August 2006 (EDT)		You know, I really dislike this "AGIDEX" term that popped up all of a sudden. It seems... you know, pointless. We all know that roundtime reduction is the result of the sum of agility and dexterity bonuses. There are a lot of things that are based off the sum of two or more ability scores, yet we don't make terms to denote that, such as with the [[INFSTR]] article (which is clearly poking fun at the [[AGIDEX]] article via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum reductio ad absurdum]). Please don't tell me we're going to have to make pages involving other factors such as STRCON (for encumbrance calculations), STRDEX (which is used to calculate DS with Parry defense and Shield defense, and also determines the maximum AS possible from the off-hand when using [[Two Weapon Combat]]), AGIINT (for DS calculations involving the [[Dodging]] skill), and LOGINT (for the maximum experience pool size). That's just silly, if you ask me. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 18:59, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 13:36, 18 August 2006

2006-08-18T13:36:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:36, 18 August 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:::I think you underestimate the degree to which this AGIDEX topic distresses me. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 01:01, 18 August 2006 (EDT)		:::I think you underestimate the degree to which this AGIDEX topic distresses me. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 01:01, 18 August 2006 (EDT)

			::::Sounds like somebody needs a booster probing. ;) -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]

Maintenance script at 05:01, 18 August 2006

2006-08-18T05:01:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:01, 18 August 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	::Well, I figure that if the Martians love AGIDEX, then we should too. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]		::Well, I figure that if the Martians love AGIDEX, then we should too. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]

			:::I think you underestimate the degree to which this AGIDEX topic distresses me. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 01:01, 18 August 2006 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 03:39, 18 August 2006

2006-08-18T03:39:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 17 August 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:I vote please. For the love of god, please. Let's delete AGIDEX, redirect it to RT, but then (here's where things get exciting) not mention AGIDEX. To me this seems like the second silliest thing you could make a KP page (for #1, [[INFSTR\|see here]]). The fact that an editor went to the trouble of then taking this page with absolutely 0 un-duplicated or useful content, made it into a template, and then put that template into this page just blows my mind. Like, it really causes my head to hurt when I think about why someone would have been motivated to do that. Why would you take a table of values that is set in stone and should only only only ever appear once and move it to a template page? I'm beginning to think this whole AGIDEX thing is some elaborate hoax to make me sad. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 22:45, 17 August 2006 (EDT)		:I vote please. For the love of god, please. Let's delete AGIDEX, redirect it to RT, but then (here's where things get exciting) not mention AGIDEX. To me this seems like the second silliest thing you could make a KP page (for #1, [[INFSTR\|see here]]). The fact that an editor went to the trouble of then taking this page with absolutely 0 un-duplicated or useful content, made it into a template, and then put that template into this page just blows my mind. Like, it really causes my head to hurt when I think about why someone would have been motivated to do that. Why would you take a table of values that is set in stone and should only only only ever appear once and move it to a template page? I'm beginning to think this whole AGIDEX thing is some elaborate hoax to make me sad. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 22:45, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

			::Well, I figure that if the Martians love AGIDEX, then we should too. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]

Maintenance script at 02:45, 18 August 2006

2006-08-18T02:45:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 17 August 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Nah, we can just leave it the way it is. It's fine that way. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 20:22, 17 August 2006 (EDT)		Nah, we can just leave it the way it is. It's fine that way. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 20:22, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

			:I vote please. For the love of god, please. Let's delete AGIDEX, redirect it to RT, but then (here's where things get exciting) not mention AGIDEX. To me this seems like the second silliest thing you could make a KP page (for #1, [[INFSTR\|see here]]). The fact that an editor went to the trouble of then taking this page with absolutely 0 un-duplicated or useful content, made it into a template, and then put that template into this page just blows my mind. Like, it really causes my head to hurt when I think about why someone would have been motivated to do that. Why would you take a table of values that is set in stone and should only only only ever appear once and move it to a template page? I'm beginning to think this whole AGIDEX thing is some elaborate hoax to make me sad. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 22:45, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 17 March 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:

	== Old topic ==		== Old topic ==
	You know, I really dislike this "AGIDEX" term that popped up all of a sudden. It seems... you know, pointless. We all know that roundtime reduction is the result of the sum of agility and dexterity bonuses. There are a lot of things that are based off the sum of two or more ability scores, yet we don't make terms to denote that, such as with the [[INFSTR]] article (which is clearly poking fun at the [[AGIDEX]] article via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum reductio ad absurdum]). Please don't tell me we're going to have to make pages involving other factors such as STRCON (for encumbrance calculations), STRDEX (which is used to calculate DS with Parry defense and Shield defense, and also determines the maximum AS possible from the off-hand when using [[Two Weapon Combat]]), AGIINT (for DS calculations involving the [[Dodging]] skill), and LOGINT (for the maximum experience pool size). That's just silly, if you ask me. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 18:59, 17 August 2006 (EDT)		You know, I really dislike this "AGIDEX" term that popped up all of a sudden. It seems... you know, pointless. We all know that roundtime reduction is the result of the sum of agility and dexterity bonuses. There are a lot of things that are based off the sum of two or more ability scores, yet we don't make terms to denote that, such as with the '''INFSTR''' article (which is clearly poking fun at the [[AGIDEX]] article via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum reductio ad absurdum]). Please don't tell me we're going to have to make pages involving other factors such as STRCON (for encumbrance calculations), STRDEX (which is used to calculate DS with Parry defense and Shield defense, and also determines the maximum AS possible from the off-hand when using [[Two Weapon Combat]]), AGIINT (for DS calculations involving the [[Dodging]] skill), and LOGINT (for the maximum experience pool size). That's just silly, if you ask me. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 18:59, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

	:I don't much care either way, but the term AGIDEX has been used for as long as I can remember. I've never heard any of those other acronyms before. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]		:I don't much care either way, but the term AGIDEX has been used for as long as I can remember. I've never heard any of those other acronyms before. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Nah, we can just leave it the way it is. It's fine that way. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 20:22, 17 August 2006 (EDT)		Nah, we can just leave it the way it is. It's fine that way. -[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 20:22, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

	:I vote please. For the love of god, please. Let's delete AGIDEX, redirect it to RT, but then (here's where things get exciting) not mention AGIDEX. To me this seems like the second silliest thing you could make a KP page (for #1, ~~[[INFSTR\|~~see here]]). The fact that an editor went to the trouble of then taking this page with absolutely 0 un-duplicated or useful content, made it into a template, and then put that template into this page just blows my mind. Like, it really causes my head to hurt when I think about why someone would have been motivated to do that. Why would you take a table of values that is set in stone and should only only only ever appear once and move it to a template page? I'm beginning to think this whole AGIDEX thing is some elaborate hoax to make me sad. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 22:45, 17 August 2006 (EDT)		:I vote please. For the love of god, please. Let's delete AGIDEX, redirect it to RT, but then (here's where things get exciting) not mention AGIDEX. To me this seems like the second silliest thing you could make a KP page (for #1, '''see here'''). The fact that an editor went to the trouble of then taking this page with absolutely 0 un-duplicated or useful content, made it into a template, and then put that template into this page just blows my mind. Like, it really causes my head to hurt when I think about why someone would have been motivated to do that. Why would you take a table of values that is set in stone and should only only only ever appear once and move it to a template page? I'm beginning to think this whole AGIDEX thing is some elaborate hoax to make me sad. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 22:45, 17 August 2006 (EDT)

	::Well, I figure that if the Martians love AGIDEX, then we should too. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]		::Well, I figure that if the Martians love AGIDEX, then we should too. -- [[User talk:EDWARDRIMKUS\|April]]