Talk:Spirit Beast - Revision history

FIRENSIA: /* Spirit beast uncommon accuracy potion */ new section

2020-06-11T13:39:33Z

Spirit beast uncommon accuracy potion: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:39, 11 June 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Revision begun on 6/8, although I have a feeling more will change with HSN. At this point I have a level 20 common beast and need to keep looking for an uncommon, because there doesn't seem to be one on Teras. I also win the weekly challenge every week with little frustration. I will definitely have the person with a legendary beast, and hopefully GM Auchand, look over this before the work-in-progress tag is removed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 17:18, 8 June 2015 (CDT)		:Revision begun on 6/8, although I have a feeling more will change with HSN. At this point I have a level 20 common beast and need to keep looking for an uncommon, because there doesn't seem to be one on Teras. I also win the weekly challenge every week with little frustration. I will definitely have the person with a legendary beast, and hopefully GM Auchand, look over this before the work-in-progress tag is removed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 17:18, 8 June 2015 (CDT)

			== Spirit beast uncommon accuracy potion ==

			I found this post today while looking for something else, and it seemed like the kind of post that contains info ripe for research/followup, hopefully to get included in the article someday. [http://forums.play.net/forums/GemStone%20IV/Old%20Forum%20Topics%20%5BRead%20Only%5D/Alchemy%20Discussions/thread/1869901?get_newest=true Spirit beast uncommon accuracy potion] -Soliere [[User:FIRENSIA\|FIRENSIA]] ([[User talk:FIRENSIA\|talk]]) 08:39, 11 June 2020 (CDT)

VANKRASN39 at 22:18, 8 June 2015

2015-06-08T22:18:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 8 June 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::Oh yeah, then there was the 6 weeks we were shut down from edits so Simu could do a clean transfer. That started very soon after EG. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:13, 29 March 2015 (CDT)		::Oh yeah, then there was the 6 weeks we were shut down from edits so Simu could do a clean transfer. That started very soon after EG. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:13, 29 March 2015 (CDT)

			:Revision begun on 6/8, although I have a feeling more will change with HSN. At this point I have a level 20 common beast and need to keep looking for an uncommon, because there doesn't seem to be one on Teras. I also win the weekly challenge every week with little frustration. I will definitely have the person with a legendary beast, and hopefully GM Auchand, look over this before the work-in-progress tag is removed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 17:18, 8 June 2015 (CDT)

VANKRASN39 at 16:13, 29 March 2015

2015-03-29T16:13:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 29 March 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:First, please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. Yes, the structure is an issue, it is a known issue. However, the system went into rewrite just two months after release, so rewriting it from the initial EG posts was pretty pointless. When the system goes a few weeks without changes, I am open to trying to rewrite it. In the meantime, it gives the info needed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 10:26, 29 March 2015 (CDT)		:First, please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. Yes, the structure is an issue, it is a known issue. However, the system went into rewrite just two months after release, so rewriting it from the initial EG posts was pretty pointless. When the system goes a few weeks without changes, I am open to trying to rewrite it. In the meantime, it gives the info needed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 10:26, 29 March 2015 (CDT)

			::Oh yeah, then there was the 6 weeks we were shut down from edits so Simu could do a clean transfer. That started very soon after EG. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:13, 29 March 2015 (CDT)

VANKRASN39 at 15:26, 29 March 2015

2015-03-29T15:26:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:26, 29 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have no experience with spirit beasts and don't have interest in delving in, but I just wanted to comment and offer a suggestion about the structure of this article. The entire framing of this article is a bit problematic due to mixed content. The article is structured in such a way that it blends 3 "categories" of wiki pages: traditional articles, saved post articles, and informal guides. This article blends each of these three seamlessly despite belonging to the "saved posts" category (though it does not follow the article title scheme for saved post articles). The main issue with this is for the sake of historical record and accuracy. It's unclear where an official post from a GM ends and where player-added content begins. The issue with blending informal guides and traditional articles is of far less impact but I'd also like to offer that many things which are acceptable in guides (personal notes, singing off with ones own name, etc) doesn't really have a place in a traditional article. Credit due to those aggregating the information, but there's a lot of credit still waiting for someone who understands spirit beasts to iron it into two or three distinct articles.		I have no experience with spirit beasts and don't have interest in delving in, but I just wanted to comment and offer a suggestion about the structure of this article. The entire framing of this article is a bit problematic due to mixed content. The article is structured in such a way that it blends 3 "categories" of wiki pages: traditional articles, saved post articles, and informal guides. This article blends each of these three seamlessly despite belonging to the "saved posts" category (though it does not follow the article title scheme for saved post articles). The main issue with this is for the sake of historical record and accuracy. It's unclear where an official post from a GM ends and where player-added content begins. The issue with blending informal guides and traditional articles is of far less impact but I'd also like to offer that many things which are acceptable in guides (personal notes, singing off with ones own name, etc) doesn't really have a place in a traditional article. Credit due to those aggregating the information, but there's a lot of credit still waiting for someone who understands spirit beasts to iron it into two or three distinct articles.

	:First, please sign your comments with ~~[[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 10:26, 29 March 2015 (CDT)~~. Yes, the structure is an issue, it is a known issue. However, the system went into rewrite just two months after release, so rewriting it from the initial EG posts was pretty pointless. When the system goes a few weeks without changes, I am open to trying to rewrite it. In the meantime, it gives the info needed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 10:26, 29 March 2015 (CDT)		:First, please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. Yes, the structure is an issue, it is a known issue. However, the system went into rewrite just two months after release, so rewriting it from the initial EG posts was pretty pointless. When the system goes a few weeks without changes, I am open to trying to rewrite it. In the meantime, it gives the info needed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 10:26, 29 March 2015 (CDT)

VANKRASN39: response.

2015-03-29T15:26:31Z

response.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:26, 29 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have no experience with spirit beasts and don't have interest in delving in, but I just wanted to comment and offer a suggestion about the structure of this article. The entire framing of this article is a bit problematic due to mixed content. The article is structured in such a way that it blends 3 "categories" of wiki pages: traditional articles, saved post articles, and informal guides. This article blends each of these three seamlessly despite belonging to the "saved posts" category (though it does not follow the article title scheme for saved post articles). The main issue with this is for the sake of historical record and accuracy. It's unclear where an official post from a GM ends and where player-added content begins. The issue with blending informal guides and traditional articles is of far less impact but I'd also like to offer that many things which are acceptable in guides (personal notes, singing off with ones own name, etc) doesn't really have a place in a traditional article. Credit due to those aggregating the information, but there's a lot of credit still waiting for someone who understands spirit beasts to iron it into two or three distinct articles.		I have no experience with spirit beasts and don't have interest in delving in, but I just wanted to comment and offer a suggestion about the structure of this article. The entire framing of this article is a bit problematic due to mixed content. The article is structured in such a way that it blends 3 "categories" of wiki pages: traditional articles, saved post articles, and informal guides. This article blends each of these three seamlessly despite belonging to the "saved posts" category (though it does not follow the article title scheme for saved post articles). The main issue with this is for the sake of historical record and accuracy. It's unclear where an official post from a GM ends and where player-added content begins. The issue with blending informal guides and traditional articles is of far less impact but I'd also like to offer that many things which are acceptable in guides (personal notes, singing off with ones own name, etc) doesn't really have a place in a traditional article. Credit due to those aggregating the information, but there's a lot of credit still waiting for someone who understands spirit beasts to iron it into two or three distinct articles.

			:First, please sign your comments with [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 10:26, 29 March 2015 (CDT). Yes, the structure is an issue, it is a known issue. However, the system went into rewrite just two months after release, so rewriting it from the initial EG posts was pretty pointless. When the system goes a few weeks without changes, I am open to trying to rewrite it. In the meantime, it gives the info needed. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 10:26, 29 March 2015 (CDT)

EASTMANM3: Structural problem with this article.

2015-03-29T07:29:02Z

Structural problem with this article.

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:29, 29 March 2015
Line 1:	Line 1:
		I have no experience with spirit beasts and don't have interest in delving in, but I just wanted to comment and offer a suggestion about the structure of this article. The entire framing of this article is a bit problematic due to mixed content. The article is structured in such a way that it blends 3 "categories" of wiki pages: traditional articles, saved post articles, and informal guides. This article blends each of these three seamlessly despite belonging to the "saved posts" category (though it does not follow the article title scheme for saved post articles). The main issue with this is for the sake of historical record and accuracy. It's unclear where an official post from a GM ends and where player-added content begins. The issue with blending informal guides and traditional articles is of far less impact but I'd also like to offer that many things which are acceptable in guides (personal notes, singing off with ones own name, etc) doesn't really have a place in a traditional article. Credit due to those aggregating the information, but there's a lot of credit still waiting for someone who understands spirit beasts to iron it into two or three distinct articles.

VANKRASN39: Blanked the page

2015-03-18T16:21:41Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 18 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Common Spirit Beasts section needs a link to Grass Snake which also needs to be edited into the list of stats for beasts.

	Grass Snakes are found in Ta'Vaalor.


	Power: 113 (low), growing quickly
	Defense: 97 (pathetic), growing at a measured pace
	Speed: 123 (moderate), growing quickly
	Insight: 111 (low), growing slowly
	Accuracy: 117 (moderate), growing at a measured pace
	Health: 96 (pathetic), growing slowly

	It is a Beast.

	Here's the juice, if anyone wants to just add it all in.

LORDKRIP at 09:10, 18 March 2015

2015-03-18T09:10:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 18 March 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Grass Snakes are found in Ta'Vaalor.		Grass Snakes are found in Ta'Vaalor.

	A small snake-shaped pendant is currently attuned to a spectral grass snake of 1 train, with the following traits:

	Power: 113 (low), growing quickly		Power: 113 (low), growing quickly

LORDKRIP: Created page with "The Common Spirit Beasts section needs a link to Grass Snake which also needs to be edited into the list of stats for beasts. Grass Snakes are found in Ta'Vaalor. A small sn..."

2015-03-18T09:10:10Z

Created page with "The Common Spirit Beasts section needs a link to Grass Snake which also needs to be edited into the list of stats for beasts. Grass Snakes are found in Ta'Vaalor. A small sn..."

New page

The Common Spirit Beasts section needs a link to Grass Snake which also needs to be edited into the list of stats for beasts.

Grass Snakes are found in Ta'Vaalor.

A small snake-shaped pendant is currently attuned to a spectral grass snake of 1 train, with the following traits:

Power: 113 (low), growing quickly
Defense: 97 (pathetic), growing at a measured pace
Speed: 123 (moderate), growing quickly
Insight: 111 (low), growing slowly
Accuracy: 117 (moderate), growing at a measured pace
Health: 96 (pathetic), growing slowly

It is a Beast.

Here's the juice, if anyone wants to just add it all in.