Talk:Statistic growth rate - Revision history

VANKRASN39: merge proposal

2016-10-05T04:39:34Z

merge proposal

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 4 October 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::My only contention with the way "growth interval" is traditionally used is that the number does not actually represent any interval. I understand where the creators of the term were coming from, since given a traditional "growth interval" it's easy to calculate the actual interval of growth, but I think their choice of name was rather unfortunate. [[User:SMO2099\|S]] 17:31, 12 December 2009 (EST)		::My only contention with the way "growth interval" is traditionally used is that the number does not actually represent any interval. I understand where the creators of the term were coming from, since given a traditional "growth interval" it's easy to calculate the actual interval of growth, but I think their choice of name was rather unfortunate. [[User:SMO2099\|S]] 17:31, 12 December 2009 (EST)

			==Merge==
			Merge into Statistic? [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 23:39, 4 October 2016 (CDT)

GS4-KEIOS: 2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:29Z

2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

SMO2099: /* Major Rewrite */

2009-12-12T22:31:25Z

Major Rewrite

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 12 December 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: I've always used growth interval myself. It sounds so much more smoother. [[User:DRIZZT-12\|Adam]] <sup>[[User talk:DRIZZT-12\|talk]]</sup> 16:19, 12 December 2009 (EST)		: I've always used growth interval myself. It sounds so much more smoother. [[User:DRIZZT-12\|Adam]] <sup>[[User talk:DRIZZT-12\|talk]]</sup> 16:19, 12 December 2009 (EST)

			::My only contention with the way "growth interval" is traditionally used is that the number does not actually represent any interval. I understand where the creators of the term were coming from, since given a traditional "growth interval" it's easy to calculate the actual interval of growth, but I think their choice of name was rather unfortunate. [[User:SMO2099\|S]] 17:31, 12 December 2009 (EST)

DRIZZT-12 at 21:19, 12 December 2009

2009-12-12T21:19:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 12 December 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I did take some major liberties. While I was consistent in using the Krakiipedia term "Growth Rate", I basically redefined in the article what is meant as a Growth Interval. I did this primarily because (a) the old terminology was awkward (b) this is as good a place as any to try and introduce cleaner terms. I very much hope that if you have any objections to my use of the term Growth Interval you give it some consideration. I understand any reluctance to change terminology (I encounter it all the time in my academic field). I would be happy to try and modify the article to keep it consistent with whatever standard Krakiipedia has or even keep it consistent with old terminology (once I get some time). [[User:SMO2099\|S]] 14:00, 12 December 2009 (EST)		I did take some major liberties. While I was consistent in using the Krakiipedia term "Growth Rate", I basically redefined in the article what is meant as a Growth Interval. I did this primarily because (a) the old terminology was awkward (b) this is as good a place as any to try and introduce cleaner terms. I very much hope that if you have any objections to my use of the term Growth Interval you give it some consideration. I understand any reluctance to change terminology (I encounter it all the time in my academic field). I would be happy to try and modify the article to keep it consistent with whatever standard Krakiipedia has or even keep it consistent with old terminology (once I get some time). [[User:SMO2099\|S]] 14:00, 12 December 2009 (EST)

			: I've always used growth interval myself. It sounds so much more smoother. [[User:DRIZZT-12\|Adam]] <sup>[[User talk:DRIZZT-12\|talk]]</sup> 16:19, 12 December 2009 (EST)

SMO2099: Created page with '==Major Rewrite== I rewrote the entire Statistic Growth Rate article. I mostly did this because certain terms were not defined and the flow of logic was not as linear as it cou…'

2009-12-12T19:00:16Z

Created page with '==Major Rewrite== I rewrote the entire Statistic Growth Rate article. I mostly did this because certain terms were not defined and the flow of logic was not as linear as it cou…'

New page

==Major Rewrite==

I rewrote the entire Statistic Growth Rate article. I mostly did this because certain terms were not defined and the flow of logic was not as linear as it could have been.

I did take some major liberties. While I was consistent in using the Krakiipedia term "Growth Rate", I basically redefined in the article what is meant as a Growth Interval. I did this primarily because (a) the old terminology was awkward (b) this is as good a place as any to try and introduce cleaner terms. I very much hope that if you have any objections to my use of the term Growth Interval you give it some consideration. I understand any reluctance to change terminology (I encounter it all the time in my academic field). I would be happy to try and modify the article to keep it consistent with whatever standard Krakiipedia has or even keep it consistent with old terminology (once I get some time). [[User:SMO2099|S]] 14:00, 12 December 2009 (EST)