Talk:Verb:CONVERT - Revision history

GS4-XERAPHINA: GS4-XERAPHINA moved page Talk:CONVERT (verb) to Talk:Verb:CONVERT: updating page naming convention, namespace

2022-03-12T01:08:02Z

GS4-XERAPHINA moved page Talk:CONVERT (verb) to Talk:Verb:CONVERT: updating page naming convention, namespace

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:08, 11 March 2022
(No difference)

GS4-KEIOS: 2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:32:20Z

2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 05:41, 11 February 2007

2007-02-11T05:41:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:41, 11 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Really? I wasn't sure about it, since small caps has trouble with punctuation and numbers (see [[Silver to Gold]], [[Brimstone]], [[Nexus]], [[Chrism]], and [[Intercession]] as examples. But I thought it was a good way to set it off without using a letterbox. [[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 23:44, 10 February 2007 (EST)		Really? I wasn't sure about it, since small caps has trouble with punctuation and numbers (see [[Silver to Gold]], [[Brimstone]], [[Nexus]], [[Chrism]], and [[Intercession]] as examples. But I thought it was a good way to set it off without using a letterbox. [[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 23:44, 10 February 2007 (EST)

			: That is more of an issue with the fact that it is bolded. Only text is affected by small-caps, and not the punctuation and numbers, and as such, the punctuation and numbers appear as normal, with bolding and all. Small-caps'd text, however, is not bolded, thus the parenthesis and the numbers appear different than the text. I've looked into attempting to fix the issue by somehow unbolding the emphasized text within the definition list/definition term HTML tags (which is what the semicolon does -- defines text as a definition term), however, my attempts at experimenting didn't yield any useful results. What you could do is give the syntax a bullet, bold the word "syntax," then use the font-variant tags. (I added the number 1 to the end of the syntax just to show an example.)
			*'''Syntax''' - <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[rub (verb)\|rub]] (gem) on (silver/wand) 1</span>
			;Syntax - <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[rub (verb)\|rub]] (gem) on (silver/wand) 1</span>
			:[[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 00:41, 11 February 2007 (EST)

Maintenance script at 04:44, 11 February 2007

2007-02-11T04:44:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:44, 10 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I rather like the small-caps font variant attribute when used for a syntax. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 22:31, 10 February 2007 (EST)		I rather like the small-caps font variant attribute when used for a syntax. - [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 22:31, 10 February 2007 (EST)

			Really? I wasn't sure about it, since small caps has trouble with punctuation and numbers (see [[Silver to Gold]], [[Brimstone]], [[Nexus]], [[Chrism]], and [[Intercession]] as examples. But I thought it was a good way to set it off without using a letterbox. [[User:VT-JSARIA\|Jeremy]] 23:44, 10 February 2007 (EST)

Maintenance script: New page: I rather like the small-caps font variant attribute when used for a syntax. - ~~~~

2007-02-11T03:31:49Z

New page: I rather like the small-caps font variant attribute when used for a syntax. - ~~~~

New page

I rather like the small-caps font variant attribute when used for a syntax. - [[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 22:31, 10 February 2007 (EST)