Talk:Voln armor - Revision history

WINTERDAWN at 02:43, 16 February 2022

2022-02-16T02:43:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:43, 15 February 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:
	As of a recent update, the armor allows ensorcell at a -100 penalty. It should also have a +50 bonus to sanctify (though not clear from document whether the bonus is like elven armor or simply +50 on top of the base -70/-140/-200.) [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 17:51, 12 February 2022 (CST)		As of a recent update, the armor allows ensorcell at a -100 penalty. It should also have a +50 bonus to sanctify (though not clear from document whether the bonus is like elven armor or simply +50 on top of the base -70/-140/-200.) [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 17:51, 12 February 2022 (CST)
	:It's just a +50. I tested it. [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 21:15, 12 February 2022 (CST)		:It's just a +50. I tested it. [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 21:15, 12 February 2022 (CST)
			:Love your wording for the sanctify/ensorcell explanation! [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 20:43, 15 February 2022 (CST)

WINTERDAWN at 03:15, 13 February 2022

2022-02-13T03:15:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 12 February 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:

	As of a recent update, the armor allows ensorcell at a -100 penalty. It should also have a +50 bonus to sanctify (though not clear from document whether the bonus is like elven armor or simply +50 on top of the base -70/-140/-200.) [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 17:51, 12 February 2022 (CST)		As of a recent update, the armor allows ensorcell at a -100 penalty. It should also have a +50 bonus to sanctify (though not clear from document whether the bonus is like elven armor or simply +50 on top of the base -70/-140/-200.) [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 17:51, 12 February 2022 (CST)
			:It's just a +50. I tested it. [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 21:15, 12 February 2022 (CST)

ZHOUY1 at 23:51, 12 February 2022

2022-02-12T23:51:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 12 February 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Am I missing some context in which having the "Order of Voln" navigation on the page is a detriment outside of the reasoning it doesn't play well with the item templates? (Or is it just the latter that you are concerned about?) [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 10:42, 2 January 2022 (CST)		:Am I missing some context in which having the "Order of Voln" navigation on the page is a detriment outside of the reasoning it doesn't play well with the item templates? (Or is it just the latter that you are concerned about?) [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 10:42, 2 January 2022 (CST)
	::Just seems superfluous. Sorry for the brevity! A bit tired :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 23:33, 2 January 2022 (CST)		::Just seems superfluous. Sorry for the brevity! A bit tired :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 23:33, 2 January 2022 (CST)

			As of a recent update, the armor allows ensorcell at a -100 penalty. It should also have a +50 bonus to sanctify (though not clear from document whether the bonus is like elven armor or simply +50 on top of the base -70/-140/-200.) [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 17:51, 12 February 2022 (CST)

WINTERDAWN: added reply

2022-01-03T05:33:45Z

added reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 3 January 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[User:MOD-GSMOTTE]] should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala [[Elven Armor]])? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (CST)		[[User:MOD-GSMOTTE]] should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala [[Elven Armor]])? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (CST)
	:It appears that the reason it is not named that way is due to wiki naming convention. When we have the proper script name (i.e., it's spelled out in the ANALYZE such as "This is tier 1 Elven Armor," we capitalize each word in the script name in accordance with grammar rules on titles. When we are providing a name because it is not specified in the analyze as a proper script name, we do not capitalize it because it is not a proper name. It is our description for the script. The ANALYZE on this page does not definitely state that the armor script name is "Voln Armor," which is likely why the article page was named the way it was. I hope that helps. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 14:51, 1 January 2022 (CST)		:It appears that the reason it is not named that way is due to wiki naming convention. When we have the proper script name (i.e., it's spelled out in the ANALYZE such as "This is tier 1 Elven Armor," we capitalize each word in the script name in accordance with grammar rules on titles. When we are providing a name because it is not specified in the analyze as a proper script name, we do not capitalize it because it is not a proper name. It is our description for the script. The ANALYZE on this page does not definitely state that the armor script name is "Voln Armor," which is likely why the article page was named the way it was. I hope that helps. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 14:51, 1 January 2022 (CST)

	::It does, thank you! [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:14, 1 January 2022 (CST)		::It does, thank you! [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:14, 1 January 2022 (CST)

	BTW, this is another page with the "Order of Voln" navigation like the Undead page. Should it be removed? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:24, 1 January 2022 (CST)		BTW, this is another page with the "Order of Voln" navigation like the Undead page. Should it be removed? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:24, 1 January 2022 (CST)
	:Am I missing some context in which having the "Order of Voln" navigation on the page is a detriment outside of the reasoning it doesn't play well with the item templates? (Or is it just the latter that you are concerned about?) [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 10:42, 2 January 2022 (CST)		:Am I missing some context in which having the "Order of Voln" navigation on the page is a detriment outside of the reasoning it doesn't play well with the item templates? (Or is it just the latter that you are concerned about?) [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 10:42, 2 January 2022 (CST)
			::Just seems superfluous. Sorry for the brevity! A bit tired :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 23:33, 2 January 2022 (CST)

MOD-GSMOTTE: Added question.

2022-01-02T16:42:50Z

Added question.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 2 January 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:

	BTW, this is another page with the "Order of Voln" navigation like the Undead page. Should it be removed? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:24, 1 January 2022 (CST)		BTW, this is another page with the "Order of Voln" navigation like the Undead page. Should it be removed? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:24, 1 January 2022 (CST)
			:Am I missing some context in which having the "Order of Voln" navigation on the page is a detriment outside of the reasoning it doesn't play well with the item templates? (Or is it just the latter that you are concerned about?) [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 10:42, 2 January 2022 (CST)

WINTERDAWN: another question on the page

2022-01-02T00:24:17Z

another question on the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 1 January 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:

	::It does, thank you! [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:14, 1 January 2022 (CST)		::It does, thank you! [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:14, 1 January 2022 (CST)

			BTW, this is another page with the "Order of Voln" navigation like the Undead page. Should it be removed? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:24, 1 January 2022 (CST)

WINTERDAWN: added response

2022-01-02T00:14:34Z

added response

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 1 January 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[User:MOD-GSMOTTE]] should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala [[Elven Armor]])? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (CST)		[[User:MOD-GSMOTTE]] should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala [[Elven Armor]])? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (CST)
	:It appears that the reason it is not named that way is due to wiki naming convention. When we have the proper script name (i.e., it's spelled out in the ANALYZE such as "This is tier 1 Elven Armor," we capitalize each word in the script name in accordance with grammar rules on titles. When we are providing a name because it is not specified in the analyze as a proper script name, we do not capitalize it because it is not a proper name. It is our description for the script. The ANALYZE on this page does not definitely state that the armor script name is "Voln Armor," which is likely why the article page was named the way it was. I hope that helps. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 14:51, 1 January 2022 (CST)		:It appears that the reason it is not named that way is due to wiki naming convention. When we have the proper script name (i.e., it's spelled out in the ANALYZE such as "This is tier 1 Elven Armor," we capitalize each word in the script name in accordance with grammar rules on titles. When we are providing a name because it is not specified in the analyze as a proper script name, we do not capitalize it because it is not a proper name. It is our description for the script. The ANALYZE on this page does not definitely state that the armor script name is "Voln Armor," which is likely why the article page was named the way it was. I hope that helps. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 14:51, 1 January 2022 (CST)

			::It does, thank you! [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:14, 1 January 2022 (CST)

MOD-GSMOTTE: Added response.

2022-01-01T20:51:13Z

Added response.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 1 January 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[User:MOD-GSMOTTE]] should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala [[Elven Armor]])? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (CST)		[[User:MOD-GSMOTTE]] should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala [[Elven Armor]])? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (CST)
			:It appears that the reason it is not named that way is due to wiki naming convention. When we have the proper script name (i.e., it's spelled out in the ANALYZE such as "This is tier 1 Elven Armor," we capitalize each word in the script name in accordance with grammar rules on titles. When we are providing a name because it is not specified in the analyze as a proper script name, we do not capitalize it because it is not a proper name. It is our description for the script. The ANALYZE on this page does not definitely state that the armor script name is "Voln Armor," which is likely why the article page was named the way it was. I hope that helps. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 14:51, 1 January 2022 (CST)

WINTERDAWN: Created page with "User:MOD-GSMOTTE should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala Elven Armor)? ~~~~"

2021-12-27T12:21:31Z

Created page with "User:MOD-GSMOTTE should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala Elven Armor)? ~~~~"

New page

[[User:MOD-GSMOTTE]] should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala [[Elven Armor]])? [[User:WINTERDAWN|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN|talk]]) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:43, 15 February 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:
	As of a recent update, the armor allows ensorcell at a -100 penalty. It should also have a +50 bonus to sanctify (though not clear from document whether the bonus is like elven armor or simply +50 on top of the base -70/-140/-200.) [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 17:51, 12 February 2022 (CST)		As of a recent update, the armor allows ensorcell at a -100 penalty. It should also have a +50 bonus to sanctify (though not clear from document whether the bonus is like elven armor or simply +50 on top of the base -70/-140/-200.) [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 17:51, 12 February 2022 (CST)
	:It's just a +50. I tested it. [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 21:15, 12 February 2022 (CST)		:It's just a +50. I tested it. [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 21:15, 12 February 2022 (CST)
			:Love your wording for the sanctify/ensorcell explanation! [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 20:43, 15 February 2022 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 12 February 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Am I missing some context in which having the "Order of Voln" navigation on the page is a detriment outside of the reasoning it doesn't play well with the item templates? (Or is it just the latter that you are concerned about?) [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 10:42, 2 January 2022 (CST)		:Am I missing some context in which having the "Order of Voln" navigation on the page is a detriment outside of the reasoning it doesn't play well with the item templates? (Or is it just the latter that you are concerned about?) [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 10:42, 2 January 2022 (CST)
	::Just seems superfluous. Sorry for the brevity! A bit tired :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 23:33, 2 January 2022 (CST)		::Just seems superfluous. Sorry for the brevity! A bit tired :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 23:33, 2 January 2022 (CST)

			As of a recent update, the armor allows ensorcell at a -100 penalty. It should also have a +50 bonus to sanctify (though not clear from document whether the bonus is like elven armor or simply +50 on top of the base -70/-140/-200.) [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 17:51, 12 February 2022 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 3 January 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[User:MOD-GSMOTTE]] should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala [[Elven Armor]])? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (CST)		[[User:MOD-GSMOTTE]] should this page be renamed to Voln Armor (ala [[Elven Armor]])? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 06:21, 27 December 2021 (CST)
	:It appears that the reason it is not named that way is due to wiki naming convention. When we have the proper script name (i.e., it's spelled out in the ANALYZE such as "This is tier 1 Elven Armor," we capitalize each word in the script name in accordance with grammar rules on titles. When we are providing a name because it is not specified in the analyze as a proper script name, we do not capitalize it because it is not a proper name. It is our description for the script. The ANALYZE on this page does not definitely state that the armor script name is "Voln Armor," which is likely why the article page was named the way it was. I hope that helps. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 14:51, 1 January 2022 (CST)		:It appears that the reason it is not named that way is due to wiki naming convention. When we have the proper script name (i.e., it's spelled out in the ANALYZE such as "This is tier 1 Elven Armor," we capitalize each word in the script name in accordance with grammar rules on titles. When we are providing a name because it is not specified in the analyze as a proper script name, we do not capitalize it because it is not a proper name. It is our description for the script. The ANALYZE on this page does not definitely state that the armor script name is "Voln Armor," which is likely why the article page was named the way it was. I hope that helps. [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 14:51, 1 January 2022 (CST)

	::It does, thank you! [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:14, 1 January 2022 (CST)		::It does, thank you! [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:14, 1 January 2022 (CST)

	BTW, this is another page with the "Order of Voln" navigation like the Undead page. Should it be removed? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:24, 1 January 2022 (CST)		BTW, this is another page with the "Order of Voln" navigation like the Undead page. Should it be removed? [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 18:24, 1 January 2022 (CST)
	:Am I missing some context in which having the "Order of Voln" navigation on the page is a detriment outside of the reasoning it doesn't play well with the item templates? (Or is it just the latter that you are concerned about?) [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 10:42, 2 January 2022 (CST)		:Am I missing some context in which having the "Order of Voln" navigation on the page is a detriment outside of the reasoning it doesn't play well with the item templates? (Or is it just the latter that you are concerned about?) [[User:MOD-GSMOTTE\|MOD-GSMOTTE]] ([[User talk:MOD-GSMOTTE\|talk]]) 10:42, 2 January 2022 (CST)
			::Just seems superfluous. Sorry for the brevity! A bit tired :) [[User:WINTERDAWN\|WINTERDAWN]] ([[User talk:WINTERDAWN\|talk]]) 23:33, 2 January 2022 (CST)