GS4-KEIOS: 1 revision: Krakiipedia Import

2015-01-01T01:41:05Z

1 revision: Krakiipedia Import

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:41, 31 December 2014
(No difference)

Maintenance script at 16:14, 5 September 2006

2006-09-05T16:14:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:14, 5 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't see a point in splitting duration into two field, as not all spells have ''Additional Duration'', which would leave an empty field for some spells. Additionally, the longer field names ''Base Description'' and ''Additional Description'' just don't work well with the floating table considering their length. A single ''Duration'' field should be sufficient. ''Area of Effect'' is a more intuitive label than ''Availability'', and ''Group Spell'' should be changed to ''Group''. ''Span'' is still an attribute of the spell's duration, and doesn't really merit its own field. - [[User:Anshou\|Oliver]] <sup>[[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]</sup> 09:25, 5 September 2006 (EDT)		I don't see a point in splitting duration into two field, as not all spells have ''Additional Duration'', which would leave an empty field for some spells. Additionally, the longer field names ''Base Description'' and ''Additional Description'' just don't work well with the floating table considering their length. A single ''Duration'' field should be sufficient. ''Area of Effect'' is a more intuitive label than ''Availability'', and ''Group Spell'' should be changed to ''Group''. ''Span'' is still an attribute of the spell's duration, and doesn't really merit its own field. - [[User:Anshou\|Oliver]] <sup>[[User talk:Anshou\|Talk]]</sup> 09:25, 5 September 2006 (EDT)

			:I'm pretty ambivalent about the duration being split into two fields, the width of the table does not bother me, since the values (such as "30 seconds for each [[Major Elemental]] spell known") will be pretty long themselves so it's not exactly going to be lopsided. Area of effect seems like the least intuitive way you could describe availability (well, maybe second to: "F983P"). Span is very different from flat duration as it obviously describes a separate aspect. Whereas 520's duration (as described in the "Duration field(s)" is very similar to 503's, say, they have very different effects when cast multiple times on oneself. Maybe the name "Span" could be changed to something else, but it's definitely a descriptive field. [[User:ALKALOIDS\|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS\|talk]]</sup> 12:14, 5 September 2006 (EDT)

Maintenance script at 13:25, 5 September 2006

2006-09-05T13:25:30Z

New page

I don't see a point in splitting duration into two field, as not all spells have ''Additional Duration'', which would leave an empty field for some spells. Additionally, the longer field names ''Base Description'' and ''Additional Description'' just don't work well with the floating table considering their length. A single ''Duration'' field should be sufficient. ''Area of Effect'' is a more intuitive label than ''Availability'', and ''Group Spell'' should be changed to ''Group''. ''Span'' is still an attribute of the spell's duration, and doesn't really merit its own field. - [[User:Anshou|Oliver]] <sup>[[User talk:Anshou|Talk]]</sup> 09:25, 5 September 2006 (EDT)

Template talk:Defensive spell - Revision history

GS4-KEIOS: 1 revision: Krakiipedia Import

Maintenance script at 16:14, 5 September 2006

Maintenance script at 13:25, 5 September 2006