Template talk:Spell - Revision history

VANKRASN39: /* Healing Spells */ update

2016-04-11T19:51:19Z

Healing Spells: update

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 11 April 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::FC9 looks best to me. I would consider 1125 and 1150 as mainly healing spells, while 1607 is mainly stamina restoration with a healing side component. For subtypes there's no need to be too specific (arguably healing spells may not need subtypes at all as the spell names are self-explanatory). [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:00, 11 April 2016 (CDT)		::FC9 looks best to me. I would consider 1125 and 1150 as mainly healing spells, while 1607 is mainly stamina restoration with a healing side component. For subtypes there's no need to be too specific (arguably healing spells may not need subtypes at all as the spell names are self-explanatory). [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:00, 11 April 2016 (CDT)

			:::Updated the two nav templates and spell template with FC9/FFFCEF. Yes/no? Anyone else with an opinion? [[Limb Repair (1102)\|Sample page]]. [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 14:51, 11 April 2016 (CDT)

ZHOUY1 at 19:00, 11 April 2016

2016-04-11T19:00:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 11 April 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:Do we categorize Troll's Blood and Regeneration as healing spells? Do we have major/minor subtypes in the 800s? [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:00, 11 April 2016 (CDT)		:Do we categorize Troll's Blood and Regeneration as healing spells? Do we have major/minor subtypes in the 800s? [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:00, 11 April 2016 (CDT)

	::FC9 looks best to me. I would consider 1125 and 1150 as mainly healing spells, while 1607 is mainly stamina restoration with a healing side component. For subtypes there's no need to be too specific (arguably healing spells may not need subtypes at all as the spell names are self-explanatory).		::FC9 looks best to me. I would consider 1125 and 1150 as mainly healing spells, while 1607 is mainly stamina restoration with a healing side component. For subtypes there's no need to be too specific (arguably healing spells may not need subtypes at all as the spell names are self-explanatory). [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 14:00, 11 April 2016 (CDT)

ZHOUY1: Response.

2016-04-11T19:00:45Z

Response.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 11 April 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:Yeah, I was trying to keep the darker orange to the [http://www.colorhexa.com/web-safe-colors web safe] range like the other darker colors are, and since there is more blue/red than green/yellow in the Empath Base, I put it more on the yellow side to prevent the color bleed with Attack (red) and Utility (blue). But I'll try <span style="border: 3px solid #FCF; background:#FAF5FF;">FCF/FAF5FF</span> and we'll see how it looks, I think your border violet is a little too close to the Utility blue. I also like <span style="border: 3px solid #F96; background:#FFFCEF;">F96/FFFCEF</span>, <span style="border: 3px solid #FC9; background:#FFFCEF;">FC9/FFFCEF</span>, and the [http://www.colorhexa.com/ colorhexa site] in general.		:Yeah, I was trying to keep the darker orange to the [http://www.colorhexa.com/web-safe-colors web safe] range like the other darker colors are, and since there is more blue/red than green/yellow in the Empath Base, I put it more on the yellow side to prevent the color bleed with Attack (red) and Utility (blue). But I'll try <span style="border: 3px solid #FCF; background:#FAF5FF;">FCF/FAF5FF</span> and we'll see how it looks, I think your border violet is a little too close to the Utility blue. I also like <span style="border: 3px solid #F96; background:#FFFCEF;">F96/FFFCEF</span>, <span style="border: 3px solid #FC9; background:#FFFCEF;">FC9/FFFCEF</span>, and the [http://www.colorhexa.com/ colorhexa site] in general.
	:Do we categorize Troll's Blood and Regeneration as healing spells? Do we have major/minor subtypes in the 800s? [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:00, 11 April 2016 (CDT)		:Do we categorize Troll's Blood and Regeneration as healing spells? Do we have major/minor subtypes in the 800s? [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:00, 11 April 2016 (CDT)

			::FC9 looks best to me. I would consider 1125 and 1150 as mainly healing spells, while 1607 is mainly stamina restoration with a healing side component. For subtypes there's no need to be too specific (arguably healing spells may not need subtypes at all as the spell names are self-explanatory).

VANKRASN39: response

2016-04-11T16:00:11Z

response

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:00, 11 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			===Development===
	I am proposing to replace this template with what I've written in my [[User:BELATHUS/Sandbox\|sandbox]]. Reason being, the template I've written there has much of the versatility as the modular templates that Rafi and I have worked on, although it is still a work in progress. Additionally, simply replacing this template will have no effect on the current articles written as they are. Behold the power of the ParserFunctions extension. [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 18:32, 8 January 2007 (EST)		I am proposing to replace this template with what I've written in my [[User:BELATHUS/Sandbox\|sandbox]]. Reason being, the template I've written there has much of the versatility as the modular templates that Rafi and I have worked on, although it is still a work in progress. Additionally, simply replacing this template will have no effect on the current articles written as they are. Behold the power of the ParserFunctions extension. [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 18:32, 8 January 2007 (EST)

	: Alright, I believe that the template is ready to go live. None of the existing articles should be impacted. If there's a disagreement, feel free to revert, but after spending 5+ hours working on this template, I rather hope that any issues can be resolved without having to rewrite the template. [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 01:04, 9 January 2007 (EST)		: Alright, I believe that the template is ready to go live. None of the existing articles should be impacted. If there's a disagreement, feel free to revert, but after spending 5+ hours working on this template, I rather hope that any issues can be resolved without having to rewrite the template. [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 01:04, 9 January 2007 (EST)

			===Healing Spells===
	The healing spell changes look good, though the color feels very striking in comparison to the others. Maybe a more muted scheme like <span style="border: 3px solid #E0CEF2; background:#FAF5FF;">E0CEF2/FAF5FF</span>? Subtype should be one of {health/wound/scar}. [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 01:08, 11 April 2016 (CDT)		The healing spell changes look good, though the color feels very striking in comparison to the others. Maybe a more muted scheme like <span style="border: 3px solid #E0CEF2; background:#FAF5FF;">E0CEF2/FAF5FF</span>? Subtype should be one of {health/wound/scar}. [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 01:08, 11 April 2016 (CDT)

			:Yeah, I was trying to keep the darker orange to the [http://www.colorhexa.com/web-safe-colors web safe] range like the other darker colors are, and since there is more blue/red than green/yellow in the Empath Base, I put it more on the yellow side to prevent the color bleed with Attack (red) and Utility (blue). But I'll try <span style="border: 3px solid #FCF; background:#FAF5FF;">FCF/FAF5FF</span> and we'll see how it looks, I think your border violet is a little too close to the Utility blue. I also like <span style="border: 3px solid #F96; background:#FFFCEF;">F96/FFFCEF</span>, <span style="border: 3px solid #FC9; background:#FFFCEF;">FC9/FFFCEF</span>, and the [http://www.colorhexa.com/ colorhexa site] in general.
			:Do we categorize Troll's Blood and Regeneration as healing spells? Do we have major/minor subtypes in the 800s? [[User:VANKRASN39\|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39\|talk]]) 11:00, 11 April 2016 (CDT)

ZHOUY1 at 06:08, 11 April 2016

2016-04-11T06:08:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:08, 11 April 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: Alright, I believe that the template is ready to go live. None of the existing articles should be impacted. If there's a disagreement, feel free to revert, but after spending 5+ hours working on this template, I rather hope that any issues can be resolved without having to rewrite the template. [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 01:04, 9 January 2007 (EST)		: Alright, I believe that the template is ready to go live. None of the existing articles should be impacted. If there's a disagreement, feel free to revert, but after spending 5+ hours working on this template, I rather hope that any issues can be resolved without having to rewrite the template. [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 01:04, 9 January 2007 (EST)

	The healing spell changes look good, though the color feels very striking in comparison to the others. Maybe a more muted scheme like <span style="border: 3px solid #E0CEF2; background:#FAF5FF;">E0CEF2/FAF5FF</span>? Subtype should be one of {health/wound/scar}.		The healing spell changes look good, though the color feels very striking in comparison to the others. Maybe a more muted scheme like <span style="border: 3px solid #E0CEF2; background:#FAF5FF;">E0CEF2/FAF5FF</span>? Subtype should be one of {health/wound/scar}. [[User:ZHOUY1\|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1\|talk]]) 01:08, 11 April 2016 (CDT)

ZHOUY1: Comment on healing spell changes.

2016-04-11T06:08:06Z

Comment on healing spell changes.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:08, 11 April 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: Alright, I believe that the template is ready to go live. None of the existing articles should be impacted. If there's a disagreement, feel free to revert, but after spending 5+ hours working on this template, I rather hope that any issues can be resolved without having to rewrite the template. [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 01:04, 9 January 2007 (EST)		: Alright, I believe that the template is ready to go live. None of the existing articles should be impacted. If there's a disagreement, feel free to revert, but after spending 5+ hours working on this template, I rather hope that any issues can be resolved without having to rewrite the template. [[User:BELATHUS\|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS\|talk]]</sup> 01:04, 9 January 2007 (EST)

			The healing spell changes look good, though the color feels very striking in comparison to the others. Maybe a more muted scheme like <span style="border: 3px solid #E0CEF2; background:#FAF5FF;">E0CEF2/FAF5FF</span>? Subtype should be one of {health/wound/scar}.

Maintenance script at 06:04, 9 January 2007

2007-01-09T06:04:38Z

New page

I am proposing to replace this template with what I've written in my [[User:BELATHUS/Sandbox|sandbox]]. Reason being, the template I've written there has much of the versatility as the modular templates that Rafi and I have worked on, although it is still a work in progress. Additionally, simply replacing this template will have no effect on the current articles written as they are. Behold the power of the ParserFunctions extension. [[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 18:32, 8 January 2007 (EST)

: Alright, I believe that the template is ready to go live. None of the existing articles should be impacted. If there's a disagreement, feel free to revert, but after spending 5+ hours working on this template, I rather hope that any issues can be resolved without having to rewrite the template. [[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 01:04, 9 January 2007 (EST)