User:DOUG/Questions for Doug - Revision history

SIGSEGV: /* Post 100 Training Advice for Hurling Wizard */

2025-07-30T02:18:45Z

Post 100 Training Advice for Hurling Wizard

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 29 July 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:

	On discord it's: snow_glhf		On discord it's: snow_glhf
			[[User:SIGSEGV\|SIGSEGV]] ([[User talk:SIGSEGV\|talk]])


	```snow_glhf```

SIGSEGV: /* Post 100 Training Advice for Hurling Wizard */ new section

2025-07-30T01:46:28Z

Post 100 Training Advice for Hurling Wizard: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 29 July 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Just checking [[User:GS4XANLIN\|GS4XANLIN]] ([[User talk:GS4XANLIN\|talk]]) 16:52, 18 May 2023 (CDT)		Just checking [[User:GS4XANLIN\|GS4XANLIN]] ([[User talk:GS4XANLIN\|talk]]) 16:52, 18 May 2023 (CDT)

			== Post 100 Training Advice for Hurling Wizard ==

			Great Doug Upon The Mountain,

			As a returning player it is difficult to ascertain where to focus post-cap training points/efforts. I'm playing an inefficient build for fun and am hoping to get some advice.

			I have a hurling wizard that cares about shots on goal vs crits. Death metal handaxe on an etheral string. Every nick could be a winner. Usually up against Seers, Griffins, Champions in Old Ta'Faendryl.

			I'm unclear of where the next best allocation of points would be. Happy to share any character details if there's interest. At this time it feels like a struggle to push the attack strength higher. The theory being the higher AS goes the more the build can lean on crits as well as the flare. Therefore I'm looking at at lores or stamina buffs. Am I overlooking something more valuable/lower hanging fruit?

			Eg. Push Earth lores to 99 for the +9 to 902 with some ok DS perks. Pivot to ascension and enhancive items to push the stamina pool/regen space and start steering into the string's booster.

			Do you have any thoughts here?

			On discord it's: snow_glhf


			```snow_glhf```

GS4XANLIN: /* This is neat. Has anyone ever used this to ask you a question? */ new section

2023-05-18T21:52:35Z

This is neat. Has anyone ever used this to ask you a question?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 18 May 2023
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Hi I just now posted a note to you on your [[User talk:DOUG/Sandbox Colors Test]] about a broken Color Picker link, and a possible fix for it. Thanks for that cool Sandbox. -Soliere [[User:FIRENSIA\|FIRENSIA]] ([[User talk:FIRENSIA\|talk]]) 19:08, 15 April 2020 (CDT)		Hi I just now posted a note to you on your [[User talk:DOUG/Sandbox Colors Test]] about a broken Color Picker link, and a possible fix for it. Thanks for that cool Sandbox. -Soliere [[User:FIRENSIA\|FIRENSIA]] ([[User talk:FIRENSIA\|talk]]) 19:08, 15 April 2020 (CDT)

			== This is neat. Has anyone ever used this to ask you a question? ==

			Just checking [[User:GS4XANLIN\|GS4XANLIN]] ([[User talk:GS4XANLIN\|talk]]) 16:52, 18 May 2023 (CDT)

FIRENSIA: /* Color Picker link broken on Sandbox Colors Test */ new section

2020-04-16T00:08:10Z

Color Picker link broken on Sandbox Colors Test: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 15 April 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Could very well be! [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 10:11, 12 January 2017 (CST)		Could very well be! [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 10:11, 12 January 2017 (CST)

			== Color Picker link broken on Sandbox Colors Test ==

			Hi I just now posted a note to you on your [[User talk:DOUG/Sandbox Colors Test]] about a broken Color Picker link, and a possible fix for it. Thanks for that cool Sandbox. -Soliere [[User:FIRENSIA\|FIRENSIA]] ([[User talk:FIRENSIA\|talk]]) 19:08, 15 April 2020 (CDT)

DOUG: /* He might be! */ new section

2017-01-12T16:11:40Z

He might be!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 12 January 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:

	He's not right, is he?		He's not right, is he?

			== He might be! ==

			Could very well be! [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 10:11, 12 January 2017 (CST)

TSETEM: /* Testing */ new section

2016-09-23T00:45:42Z

Testing: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 22 September 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	For those who wonder why I do the things I do, let me just say '''I hate tweaking''' and since this is a test entry, it doesn't really need to make sense. [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 22:08, 27 March 2015 (CDT)		For those who wonder why I do the things I do, let me just say '''I hate tweaking''' and since this is a test entry, it doesn't really need to make sense. [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 22:08, 27 March 2015 (CDT)

			== Testing ==

			He's not right, is he?

DOUG: Listing instructions on what not to do!

2015-03-28T03:17:13Z

Listing instructions on what not to do!

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 27 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			;::Make sure you sign your question! Also, check back for a response. Questions will be added to the bottom (no way yet to inject a question at the top)

			;::I'll keep the older dialogs archived off, so this will be a fairly current activity list.

	== Why do you do it? ==		== Why do you do it? ==

	For those who wonder why I do the things I do, let me just say '''I hate tweaking'''. [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 22:08, 27 March 2015 (CDT)		For those who wonder why I do the things I do, let me just say '''I hate tweaking''' and since this is a test entry, it doesn't really need to make sense. [[User:DOUG\|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG\|talk]]) 22:08, 27 March 2015 (CDT)

DOUG: /* Why do you do it? */ new section

2015-03-28T03:08:01Z

Why do you do it?: new section

New page

== Why do you do it? ==

For those who wonder why I do the things I do, let me just say '''I hate tweaking'''. [[User:DOUG|DOUG]] ([[User talk:DOUG|talk]]) 22:08, 27 March 2015 (CDT)