Weighting/saved posts - Revision history

VANKRASN39: change to redirect page

2017-03-28T14:50:51Z

change to redirect page

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 28 March 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
			#redirect [[padding/saved posts]]
	I've added a few more thresholds to help you out. Everything from "masterful" down through "light" is unchanged from the convention that has been used for the past several years. Note that incredible has been moved up the list, to be, well, incredible.

	In order of descending magnitude:

	wondrous

	incredible

	fantastic <-- standard [[claidhmore]]s

	phenomenal

	expert

	superb

	masterful

	exceptional

	very heavy

	heavy <--- standard katanas

	decent

	somewhat

	light

	no [[padding]]/[[weighting]] <-- This is the baseline

	slightly diminished

	somewhat diminished

	noticeably diminished

	substantially diminished


	The specific values associated with each threshold are not something we'll be releasing. Player estimates of current value correlations are based on player research.

	<<a non-claidhmore weapon(meaning a weapon not NAMED a claidhmore) that has 40 points of weighting, would it read as "claidhmore" weighting, or "fantastic" weighting? >>

	A non-claidhmore with critical weighting equivalent to a claidhmore would assess as fantastic.

	<<How would armor be worse than average?>>

	Any [[armor]] with negative padding would be worse than average, and it would actually cause the wearer to take extra damage or more lethal criticals (bummer!). There are some suits of armor in the game with negative damage padding. I'm not aware of any armor with negative critical padding, offhand, but it probably exists.

	Warden

	[[Category:Saved Posts]]

VANKRASN39: VANKRASN39 moved page Weighting (saved post) to Weighting/saved posts: saved post reorg

2017-03-28T14:46:23Z

VANKRASN39 moved page Weighting (saved post) to Weighting/saved posts: saved post reorg

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:46, 28 March 2017
(No difference)

SPYRIDONM1: added links

2014-05-22T19:34:40Z

added links

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 22 May 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	incredible		incredible

	fantastic <-- standard ~~claidhmores~~		fantastic <-- standard [[claidhmore]]s

	phenomenal		phenomenal
Line 29:		Line 29:
	light		light

	no padding/weighting <-- This is the baseline		no [[padding]]/[[weighting]] <-- This is the baseline

	slightly diminished		slightly diminished
Line 48:		Line 48:
	<<How would armor be worse than average?>>		<<How would armor be worse than average?>>

	Any armor with negative padding would be worse than average, and it would actually cause the wearer to take extra damage or more lethal criticals (bummer!). There are some suits of armor in the game with negative damage padding. I'm not aware of any armor with negative critical padding, offhand, but it probably exists.		Any [[armor]] with negative padding would be worse than average, and it would actually cause the wearer to take extra damage or more lethal criticals (bummer!). There are some suits of armor in the game with negative damage padding. I'm not aware of any armor with negative critical padding, offhand, but it probably exists.

	Warden		Warden

Maintenance script: Created page with 'I've added a few more thresholds to help you out. Everything from "masterful" down through "light" is unchanged from the convention that has been used for the past several years.…'

2009-11-08T16:22:35Z

Created page with 'I've added a few more thresholds to help you out. Everything from "masterful" down through "light" is unchanged from the convention that has been used for the past several years.…'

New page

I've added a few more thresholds to help you out. Everything from "masterful" down through "light" is unchanged from the convention that has been used for the past several years. Note that incredible has been moved up the list, to be, well, incredible.

In order of descending magnitude:

wondrous

incredible

fantastic <-- standard claidhmores

phenomenal

expert

superb

masterful

exceptional

very heavy

heavy <--- standard katanas

decent

somewhat

light

no padding/weighting <-- This is the baseline

slightly diminished

somewhat diminished

noticeably diminished

substantially diminished

The specific values associated with each threshold are not something we'll be releasing. Player estimates of current value correlations are based on player research.

<<a non-claidhmore weapon(meaning a weapon not NAMED a claidhmore) that has 40 points of weighting, would it read as "claidhmore" weighting, or "fantastic" weighting? >>

A non-claidhmore with critical weighting equivalent to a claidhmore would assess as fantastic.

<<How would armor be worse than average?>>

Any armor with negative padding would be worse than average, and it would actually cause the wearer to take extra damage or more lethal criticals (bummer!). There are some suits of armor in the game with negative damage padding. I'm not aware of any armor with negative critical padding, offhand, but it probably exists.

Warden

[[Category:Saved Posts]]