Talk:Animal companion

If this article is about the Animal Companion entity, shouldn't it not be capitolized? As it is, currently, it'll interfere with the redirects to the spell, when the spell article is finally created. It'll also interfere with U's template, even if all the article links are corrected. Anyway, it is my belief that this isn't a proper noun, anyway, unless you're referring to the spell itself. -Andy ^talk 11:36, 4 May 2006 (PDT)

...instead of typing all that, you could have just moved the stupid page. :P Oliver (User | Talk) 13:45, 4 May 2006 (PDT)

Heh. There was some debate on the matter, so I figured it'd be best to discuss it first. -Andy ^talk 14:15, 4 May 2006 (PDT)