Talk:Armor: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (response) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Z- Do you think it would be beneficial to put the images in the chart with the AsG, CvAs, etc? Also, did you use the bulk upload? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 17:19, 27 January 2017 (CST) |
Z- Do you think it would be beneficial to put the images in the chart with the AsG, CvAs, etc? Also, did you use the bulk upload? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 17:19, 27 January 2017 (CST) |
||
:I was concerned about potentially adding 400kb to the download every time the table is transcluded, and it may not be as easy to read. I did use the batch upload for the images. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 17:41, 27 January 2017 (CST) |
:I was concerned about potentially adding 400kb to the download every time the table is transcluded, and it may not be as easy to read. I did use the batch upload for the images. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 17:41, 27 January 2017 (CST) |
||
::Sounds like a good reason to me. Any objection to adding the AsG after the name under the picture? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 20:16, 27 January 2017 (CST) |
|||
Revision as of 21:16, 27 January 2017
Z- Do you think it would be beneficial to put the images in the chart with the AsG, CvAs, etc? Also, did you use the bulk upload? VANKRASN39 (talk) 17:19, 27 January 2017 (CST)
- I was concerned about potentially adding 400kb to the download every time the table is transcluded, and it may not be as easy to read. I did use the batch upload for the images. ZHOUY1 (talk) 17:41, 27 January 2017 (CST)
- Sounds like a good reason to me. Any objection to adding the AsG after the name under the picture? VANKRASN39 (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2017 (CST)