User talk:Ildran: Difference between revisions

The official GemStone IV encyclopedia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (argh! nudged my comment up some)
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:


: Disjointed would indeed be the accurate term for having to look on two different pages for one continuous conversation. Thanks for the heads up mah man. On a completely unrelated note, [http://bloodjewels.com/misc/ulthwich3.jpg here] is proof of my 1337 sammich creation skillz0rz (<3 Jen 4 hosting!) [[User:ULTHRIPE|Ulthripe]] 22:43, 25 January 2006 (PST)
: Disjointed would indeed be the accurate term for having to look on two different pages for one continuous conversation. Thanks for the heads up mah man. On a completely unrelated note, [http://bloodjewels.com/misc/ulthwich3.jpg here] is proof of my 1337 sammich creation skillz0rz (<3 Jen 4 hosting!) [[User:ULTHRIPE|Ulthripe]] 22:43, 25 January 2006 (PST)

:: Worry not, my friend. The Sammich has been consumed and the lives of the townsfolk saved. For now. [[User:ULTHRIPE|Ulthripe]] 13:49, 26 January 2006 (PST)


== Botz0rz ==
== Botz0rz ==

Revision as of 16:51, 26 January 2006

I'm an idiot. Should have included the category when I made all those. Dur. Anshou 14:08, 23 December 2005 (CST)

Dude. User talk is f-in awesome. Anshou 14:10, 23 December 2005 (CST)

Take it easy, and have a good holiday. Anshou 14:13, 23 December 2005 (CST)

Holy shit dude! That's awesome! :D Anshou 10:12, 27 December 2005 (CST)

Ha! So that's how this whole new fangled user talk works. I feel like such a... well, for lack of a better term, wikin00b. Anywho, yes. It's quite complex, what with the robot and all. *grin* Doom Duck 00:08, 6 January 2006 (CST)

CRON FTW! :D Dude, Josh signed up for an account, how pimp is that. Heh! You need to stop falling off the face of the earth too, man. Anshou 00:58, 12 January 2006 (CST)

What the heck are you doing for 16 hours a day? Anshou 01:00, 12 January 2006 (CST)

Jazz huh? Looks wicked cool.  :) Anshou 01:06, 12 January 2006 (CST)

I'll see what I can do about learning them. The only reason I never bothered to learn them is because I could use HTML tables, and until seeing the example table you've made, I've had no further encouragement to learn the WikiMedia table format. -Belathus 22:53, 15 January 2006 (CST)

Thanks for the tips. I was just trying to flesh out some of the categories a bit. I'll try and wait until I have some time to fill them up a bit first... :) Brassaldennar 17:52, 17 January 2006 (CST)

On Minor Changes: Aye aye! I thought I'd actually clicked it off after some consideration, but now I won't have to consider anyways. Doom Duck 23:30, 19 January 2006 (PST)

Disjointed would indeed be the accurate term for having to look on two different pages for one continuous conversation. Thanks for the heads up mah man. On a completely unrelated note, here is proof of my 1337 sammich creation skillz0rz (<3 Jen 4 hosting!) Ulthripe 22:43, 25 January 2006 (PST)
Worry not, my friend. The Sammich has been consumed and the lives of the townsfolk saved. For now. Ulthripe 13:49, 26 January 2006 (PST)

Botz0rz

Yo. Can you make your bot look for stubs and mark articles with {{stub}} when it finds one? I dunno what criteria we could use to determine stubs. I was thinking something like counting either words, sentances or paragraphs in each subsection, with any sentance consisting of less than 6-10 words being ignored. If any subsection has more than two paragraphs, or more than 5 or so sentances in its paragraph, the article isn't a stub? Who knows, that's just a random set of criteria. I'm sure we could some up with something more interesting. Krakiipedia:Stub needs fleshing out too, heh. Ideas? Anshou 20:21, 17 January 2006 (CST)

Test test - Ildran 13:20, 18 January 2006 (PST)

Copyright

Hey. I think we might need to build a template for inclusion in potentially copyrighted works (or works released into public domain/under licence) if we're going to add that kind of stuff here. WP has some templates like it stating something like "This work is released into the public domain and may be used freely." or "This work is copyrighted and used by wikipedia with permission from its creator(s)." I think it's used with images primarily. Thoughts? Oliver 08:23, 25 January 2006 (PST)

That sounds like a good idea. I'll see if I can't throw one together without making a fool of myself. :D Oliver 08:36, 25 January 2006 (PST)

Check out Template:Copyright-p. Why am I looking at HDD access times? Oliver 09:27, 25 January 2006 (PST)

Haha! I didn't even *see* the 0.1 up there. That's insane! I want a hard ram drive. :D Oliver 09:44, 25 January 2006 (PST)

Categories

I'm not sure I follow what you mean. Oliver 20:19, 25 January 2006 (PST)