Talk:Major Acid (926): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Less information, usually, isn't a good thing... lets just say, I don't totally understand why you'd delete most of this article. -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 09:05, 2 June 2006 (EDT) |
Less information, usually, isn't a good thing... lets just say, I don't totally understand why you'd delete most of this article. -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 09:05, 2 June 2006 (EDT) |
||
: It was redundant information which can be found in the linked articles. If someone doesn't know that a ball spell has a chance to splash, they'll click on the ball spell link to find out what a ball spell is and does. If they know, the information is useless. The same goes for lore/skill effects on splashing, which don't belong in this article. Ditto magic item activation. [[User:Anshou|Oliver]] <sup>[[User talk:Anshou|Talk]]</sup> 02:53, 4 June 2006 (EDT) |
|||
And if they don't know that information, it isn't useless at all. I still feel that it shouldn't have been deleted. None of it. -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 22:53, 4 June 2006 (EDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:32, 31 December 2014
Less information, usually, isn't a good thing... lets just say, I don't totally understand why you'd delete most of this article. -Andy talk 09:05, 2 June 2006 (EDT)
- It was redundant information which can be found in the linked articles. If someone doesn't know that a ball spell has a chance to splash, they'll click on the ball spell link to find out what a ball spell is and does. If they know, the information is useless. The same goes for lore/skill effects on splashing, which don't belong in this article. Ditto magic item activation. Oliver Talk 02:53, 4 June 2006 (EDT)
And if they don't know that information, it isn't useless at all. I still feel that it shouldn't have been deleted. None of it. -Andy talk 22:53, 4 June 2006 (EDT)