Gswiki talk:Style guide/Spells: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (GS4-XERAPHINA moved page Help talk:Spells to Gswiki talk:Style guide/Spells: moving to subpage to Gswiki:Style guide) |
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 14:23, 9 October 2023
This should probably be changed, now. -Andy talk 00:06, 1 December 2006 (EST)
- It would be helpful if the article weren't protected from being edited. who is Ulthripe reads this 03:13, 1 December 2006 (EST)
Okay, now that I have the ability to change this, how do you think I should do so? I could simply link the Help:Spell templates article, or I could leave this here stating that the old spell template is obsolete... or something. Andy talk 14:54, 30 December 2006 (EST)
- KP policy on spell articles has not changed. I simply don't agree with the new templates created. With the addition of the two new parser extensions, the potential for new and more robust templates is here, so I'm going to revisit the spell template and see what can be done to improve it. Oliver Talk 13:55, 3 January 2007 (EST)
Okay, now that I've changed the spell template to have almost as much power as the modular templates but in a single article, perhaps now we should change this help article? I am curious as to the general opinion of the edits I made, as they were quite... involved, as you can likely see by the 50+ edits (between Template:Spell and User:BELATHUS/Sandbox) over the course of many, many hours it took to reach its current state. Andy talk 20:22, 10 January 2007 (EST)