Talk:Citadel Alchemist: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: The word, "Alchemist's" appears incorrect. The apostrophe S denotes possession, and I'm very certain that the Alchemist isn't possessing anything, especially considering that there is not...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The word, "Alchemist's" appears incorrect. The apostrophe S denotes possession, and I'm very certain that the Alchemist isn't possessing anything, especially considering that there is nothing after "Alchemist's". If you meant to use the plural of Alchemist, that would be Alchemists. If it is an alchemist shop, it would likely be called an alchemist shop. Maybe an alchemist's shop. If it is an alchemy lab, perhaps you should use that. In any case, unless the alchemist is possessing something, this is wrong. - [[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 01:33, 30 December 2007 (EST) |
The word, "Alchemist's" appears incorrect. The apostrophe S denotes possession, and I'm very certain that the Alchemist isn't possessing anything, especially considering that there is nothing after "Alchemist's". If you meant to use the plural of Alchemist, that would be Alchemists. If it is an alchemist shop, it would likely be called an alchemist shop. Maybe an alchemist's shop. If it is an alchemy lab, perhaps you should use that. In any case, unless the alchemist is possessing something, this is wrong. - [[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 01:33, 30 December 2007 (EST) |
||
:It should be changed to "Citadel Alchemist," as Alchemist, singular, is the form used in the room descriptions. For the editor's sake, that area has been closed off for about two or more years. [[User:Scribes|Scribes]] 10:57, 30 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 09:57, 30 December 2007
The word, "Alchemist's" appears incorrect. The apostrophe S denotes possession, and I'm very certain that the Alchemist isn't possessing anything, especially considering that there is nothing after "Alchemist's". If you meant to use the plural of Alchemist, that would be Alchemists. If it is an alchemist shop, it would likely be called an alchemist shop. Maybe an alchemist's shop. If it is an alchemy lab, perhaps you should use that. In any case, unless the alchemist is possessing something, this is wrong. - Andy talk 01:33, 30 December 2007 (EST)
- It should be changed to "Citadel Alchemist," as Alchemist, singular, is the form used in the room descriptions. For the editor's sake, that area has been closed off for about two or more years. Scribes 10:57, 30 December 2007 (EST)