Category talk:Adventurers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't |
I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive, I don't understand the logic in having a listing of adventurers with most of the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? Just an honest question here, and no offense meant to anyone. [[User:CARABELE|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST) |
||
Revision as of 20:39, 14 January 2007
I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive, I don't understand the logic in having a listing of adventurers with most of the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? Just an honest question here, and no offense meant to anyone. carabele 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)