User talk:MORNE

Article/Edits at Risk for Deletion

Hi there, MORNE. In reviewing some of the recent updates, I saw that you have made edits to Tatterclaws (prime), which appears to be a character page for someone else's character. There is no indication on the article's Discussion/Talk tab that Tatterclaw's player gave you permission to create or edit a character page on their behalf. Gswiki:Policy prohibits users from editing character pages unless the character is theirs or they have been given permission by that character's player to make those edits. If you do have permission to edit this character page, you will need to indicate this by clearly stating it on its Discussion/Talk tab, Talk:Tatterclaws (prime), that you have been given permission to do so by the player. Simply noting that in the edit reason for an article is not enough for Gswiki:Policy. Alternatively, Tatterclaw's player can put that information on the discussion page. When adding that information, please make sure to add ~~~~ at the end of your comments, which will automatically add a "signature" with your user name, plus the date and time of when your edit was made. If that information is not added within 7 days, your edits to the character page will be deleted from the wiki. If you have any questions about this process or need more information about the updated policy for editing character pages, please reach out to the wiki team on the Gemstone Discord forum's wiki thread. Thank you for understanding. HOST-GSKEBECHET (talk) 09:25, 23 July 2024 (CDT)

Hello again, MORNE. Thank you for adding the note to Talk:Tatterclaws (prime) that both accounts are associated with the character. So that you are aware, the {{mod-delete}} template that I had placed on the article should not have been removed by anyone other than a moderator, whether that person another moderator or me, as that slows down the review process. While I recognize that the manual reversion you did to the article to remove the template was likely done in good faith, please do not do so again in the future as it is considered a violation of Gswiki:Policy. I apologize that the note I placed on Talk:Tatterclaws (prime) to not remove it was not included in my message to you here. HOST-GSKEBECHET (talk) 09:56, 21 August 2024 (CDT)

Sorry about that, thought I was saving you a step! I'll leave it in the future.

That's quite alright, and I understand the intent completely. I just wanted to clarify for your benefit. Thank you for understanding! HOST-GSKEBECHET (talk) 08:43, 10 September 2024 (CDT)