Category talk:Adventurers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not containing much info. [[User:CARABELE|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST) |
I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? [[User:CARABELE|carabele]] 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 20:38, 14 January 2007
I guess I am missing the point of this category, but since this can't be in any way comprehensive I don't see the logic in having just a listing of adventurers with most the pages not containing much info. Is this something that really belongs on Krakiipedia, i.e., the best use for the wiki? carabele 21:37, 14 January 2007 (EST)