Category talk:Legendary Items: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MILQUETOAST (talk | contribs) m (Category talk:Rare Items moved to Category talk:Legendary Items) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:They should be combined. I prefer the category name "legendary items" but it might be too narrow, on the other hand "rare items" might be too broad. Maybe "Unique items" or "Special items". 03:42, 6 September 2009 (EDT) [[User:KANYDA|Drew]] |
:They should be combined. I prefer the category name "legendary items" but it might be too narrow, on the other hand "rare items" might be too broad. Maybe "Unique items" or "Special items". 03:42, 6 September 2009 (EDT) [[User:KANYDA|Drew]] |
||
::A bit late, but I lean towards "rare items". Don't really feel that Iasha weapons, dice of fate (quite a few of them out there now), glass bottles, etc., warrant a more limiting category. Also, there's the fact that some of the current pages already refer to (rare items). (Oh, and I do concur that only one category is the best approach.) [[User:KAGE|KAGE]] 19:43, 3 October 2011 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 17:43, 3 October 2011
Crap. What's the difference between the Rare Items category and the Legendary Items category? Should we combine them or try to filter out the uber legendary items from the merely rare items? Becca 10:54, 5 September 2009 (EDT)
- They should be combined. I prefer the category name "legendary items" but it might be too narrow, on the other hand "rare items" might be too broad. Maybe "Unique items" or "Special items". 03:42, 6 September 2009 (EDT) Drew
- A bit late, but I lean towards "rare items". Don't really feel that Iasha weapons, dice of fate (quite a few of them out there now), glass bottles, etc., warrant a more limiting category. Also, there's the fact that some of the current pages already refer to (rare items). (Oh, and I do concur that only one category is the best approach.) KAGE 19:43, 3 October 2011 (EDT)