Talk:Spellburst: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (response) |
||
| (83 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ok, two things. First, please use four tilds (this character on the key next to the 1: ~ ) at the end of posts to talk pages to sign and date them. Second, shouldn't this entire talk page be transferred to it's own research page, since it's pretty obvious that's what it is. [[User:OM1E5GA|OM1E5GA]] ([[User talk:OM1E5GA|talk]]) 23:48, 20 December 2017 (CST) |
|||
I'm having my first experience with spell burst in Nelemar with my capped paladin so I figured I'd post my observations on here. I will test additions of worn mana in 0.5 mana increments and track my ability to avoid spell burst including those additions as I continue to train skills that impact spell burst. |
|||
:Transferred to [[Research:Spellburst]]. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 15:25, 7 May 2018 (CDT) |
|||
Using the Gib's wiki calculation I currently have wearable mana of 65.78. My current burst-free set is 406, 414, 506, 508, 509, 601 and 202. Referring to Gib's modifiers I count each elemental spell as costing an additional 0.5 mana, each spell of level nine or over as costing an additional 0.5 mana and each spell identified by Gib as causing unique problems as costing an additional 0.5 mana. Using those modifiers I calculate values of 6.5, 15, 6.5, 8.5, 10.5, 1 and 2 for each spell in my burst-free set totaling 50 mana. |
|||
Replacing 601 with 401 (+0.5 mana) does not result in spell burst. Replacing 202 and 601 with 503 (+0.5 mana) does not result in spell burst. |
|||
Replacing 406 with 507 (+1 mana) results in spell burst. |
|||
Adding 401 (+1.5 mana) results in spell burst. |
|||
[[User:MICHN18|MICHN18]] ([[User talk:MICHN18|talk]]) 12:30, 5 January 2016 (CST) |
|||
:Since this is the 2nd talk page you've added to (with good content btw), I wanted to remind you to sign you comments with 4 tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> like that. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 12:19, 5 January 2016 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:25, 7 May 2018
Ok, two things. First, please use four tilds (this character on the key next to the 1: ~ ) at the end of posts to talk pages to sign and date them. Second, shouldn't this entire talk page be transferred to it's own research page, since it's pretty obvious that's what it is. OM1E5GA (talk) 23:48, 20 December 2017 (CST)
- Transferred to Research:Spellburst. VANKRASN39 (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2018 (CDT)