Talk:Adventurer's Guild: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
:I suggest recording just how many gems you've collected for these tasks. Since I know these figures, I went ahead and added them, though it looks to me like the bounty points recieved is independant of the number of gems required. -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 04:44, 14 August 2006 (EDT) |
:I suggest recording just how many gems you've collected for these tasks. Since I know these figures, I went ahead and added them, though it looks to me like the bounty points recieved is independant of the number of gems required. -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 04:44, 14 August 2006 (EDT) |
||
Yes, it is independent of the number of gems, and so is just going to wind up being a retardedly long (and not particularly meaningful [in my opinion] table). I'll add what i have to it if really you guys think that it's important. I mean, Andy knows how many gem types there are, and yeah. Unless this was totally exhaustive, I don't see it being that useful. Also whoever was doing that table knows that this entry <nowiki> |[[ruby|star ruby]]</nowiki> is pretty silly as clearly there's a ginormous difference between rubies and star rubies (even though neither really links to a real page yet). Oh well, just my $0.02. [[User:ALKALOIDS|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS|talk]]</sup> 10:59, 14 August 2006 (EDT) |
|||
== Things that need to be done == |
== Things that need to be done == |
||
Revision as of 09:59, 14 August 2006
Bounty Points by Gem Type
Perhaps this table can get added to this page (or one of its own) when it fills out a bit more? who is Ulthripe reads this 03:51, 14 August 2006 (EDT)
Bounty Rewards for the Gem Gathering Task
| Gem type | Number of Gems |
Bounty Points Received |
Silver Per Gem |
|---|---|---|---|
| emerald | 5 | 1250 | 1250 |
| star ruby | 6 | 850 | 300 |
| yellow zircon | 8 | 450 | 25 |
- I suggest recording just how many gems you've collected for these tasks. Since I know these figures, I went ahead and added them, though it looks to me like the bounty points recieved is independant of the number of gems required. -Andy talk 04:44, 14 August 2006 (EDT)
Yes, it is independent of the number of gems, and so is just going to wind up being a retardedly long (and not particularly meaningful [in my opinion] table). I'll add what i have to it if really you guys think that it's important. I mean, Andy knows how many gem types there are, and yeah. Unless this was totally exhaustive, I don't see it being that useful. Also whoever was doing that table knows that this entry |[[ruby|star ruby]] is pretty silly as clearly there's a ginormous difference between rubies and star rubies (even though neither really links to a real page yet). Oh well, just my $0.02. justin talk 10:59, 14 August 2006 (EDT)
Things that need to be done
- put this in a category
- discuss faraway tasks
- declare this to be AdG unequivocally
so what do you think? category suggestions? should we list a range of rewards for a given task or an average? justin talk 19:39, 12 July 2006 (EDT)