Talk:Instrument learning: Difference between revisions
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Or! We could simply move the document to [[Instrument learning guide]] and, being labeled as a guide, the format would depend completely on the creator of the guide. -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 20:09, 21 October 2006 (EDT) |
Or! We could simply move the document to [[Instrument learning guide]] and, being labeled as a guide, the format would depend completely on the creator of the guide. -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 20:09, 21 October 2006 (EDT) |
||
::I think we could do both. Have the technical information remain in the article, then move the "advice" and "experience" information to the guide.[[User:REBELAT|Rail]] 22:23, 21 October 2006 (EDT) |
::I think we could do both. Have the technical information remain in the article, then move the "advice" and "experience" information to the guide.[[User:REBELAT|Rail]] 22:23, 21 October 2006 (EDT) |
||
Honestly folks, I don't have a clue as to how to convert things to MediaWiki or adding the links. My main concern was just to get the info posted somewhere so people could see it. |
|||
I personally don't see what real difference changing the title to Instrument Learning Guide makes as for formatting. Is this some esoteric Wiki procedure / courtesy practice or something? |
|||
The personal comments were there to show the time it took. It was to provide info and show how much dedication it takes to get through them all, not to say hey look at me. The items I have posted here are taken directly from what I used to post on the boards. |
|||
I didn't have any clue at all how this whole thing worked when it was suggested to me to post them up here. Since its not a real big priority for me as long as the info available I'm in no rush to learn all the procedures just to pretty them up. |
|||
Revision as of 06:00, 22 October 2006
Cleanup!
No offense, Icewhite, but I don't feel that these articles meet the quality standards of Krakiipedia. These are the changes I propose:
- Eliminating the personal comments on your character's progress.
- Converting the preformatted stuff to MediaWiki format.
- "Wikifying" the document by adding links to the various verbs used, among other things.
- Eliminating Icewhite's signature from the bottom of the document. Credit is given to authors of articles in the history of the page.
Or! We could simply move the document to Instrument learning guide and, being labeled as a guide, the format would depend completely on the creator of the guide. -Andy talk 20:09, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
- I think we could do both. Have the technical information remain in the article, then move the "advice" and "experience" information to the guide.Rail 22:23, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
Honestly folks, I don't have a clue as to how to convert things to MediaWiki or adding the links. My main concern was just to get the info posted somewhere so people could see it.
I personally don't see what real difference changing the title to Instrument Learning Guide makes as for formatting. Is this some esoteric Wiki procedure / courtesy practice or something?
The personal comments were there to show the time it took. It was to provide info and show how much dedication it takes to get through them all, not to say hey look at me. The items I have posted here are taken directly from what I used to post on the boards.
I didn't have any clue at all how this whole thing worked when it was suggested to me to post them up here. Since its not a real big priority for me as long as the info available I'm in no rush to learn all the procedures just to pretty them up.