Category talk:Utility Spells: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(response) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What do people think about getting the healing spells out of this category and into their own? It would mean a new spell template and color in the navigation, but I don't think it will be otherwise too complicated since it only covers two spell circles. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 23:40, 31 March 2016 (CDT) |
What do people think about getting the healing spells out of this category and into their own? It would mean a new spell template and color in the navigation, but I don't think it will be otherwise too complicated since it only covers two spell circles. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 23:40, 31 March 2016 (CDT) |
||
:I like it! [[User:VERSIN|VERSIN]] ([[User talk:VERSIN|talk]]) 09:49, 1 April 2016 (CDT) |
:I like it! [[User:VERSIN|VERSIN]] ([[User talk:VERSIN|talk]]) 09:49, 1 April 2016 (CDT) |
||
::That sounds good. Some spells that have multiple categories aren't easy to code with Template:Spell so additional templates are helpful. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 23:06, 7 April 2016 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 22:06, 7 April 2016
What do people think about getting the healing spells out of this category and into their own? It would mean a new spell template and color in the navigation, but I don't think it will be otherwise too complicated since it only covers two spell circles. VANKRASN39 (talk) 23:40, 31 March 2016 (CDT)