User talk:INIQUITY: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (ah, tildes) |
FIREPHOENIX (talk | contribs) m (Question about ICE lore) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Great work! I saw you did the flow storms page, do you have any info on flow patterns? (See [[Planar Shift (740)]].) [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 23:48, 4 February 2015 (CST) |
Great work! I saw you did the flow storms page, do you have any info on flow patterns? (See [[Planar Shift (740)]].) [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 23:48, 4 February 2015 (CST) |
||
:Thank you :) I'm afraid not, or at least, nothing modern. There is very old lore on the "flows of essence", describing them as like rivers in a radiation field. There was a map of the (old) continent from 1989 that had "greater" and "lesser" flows on it. I would think you'd use those for pinning down your region, then using "local" or "minor" rivulets or nodes to specify a more precise spot. If the flows had stable branchings over time, it would make sense to call that a unique flow pattern. I'm always reluctant with "magical physics" because I'm never sure what is still true. (e.g. Familiars [[Kelfour Edition volume II number X|used to be]] extra-planar entities taking the form of small animals, and [http://www.play.net/dr/info/guilds/wm.asp still are] in DragonRealms, but is that still true? I would guess [[wyrdling|wyrdlings]] re-established it.) [[User:INIQUITY|INIQUITY]] ([[User talk:INIQUITY|talk]]) 14:09, 5 February 2015 (CST) |
:Thank you :) I'm afraid not, or at least, nothing modern. There is very old lore on the "flows of essence", describing them as like rivers in a radiation field. There was a map of the (old) continent from 1989 that had "greater" and "lesser" flows on it. I would think you'd use those for pinning down your region, then using "local" or "minor" rivulets or nodes to specify a more precise spot. If the flows had stable branchings over time, it would make sense to call that a unique flow pattern. I'm always reluctant with "magical physics" because I'm never sure what is still true. (e.g. Familiars [[Kelfour Edition volume II number X|used to be]] extra-planar entities taking the form of small animals, and [http://www.play.net/dr/info/guilds/wm.asp still are] in DragonRealms, but is that still true? I would guess [[wyrdling|wyrdlings]] re-established it.) [[User:INIQUITY|INIQUITY]] ([[User talk:INIQUITY|talk]]) 14:09, 5 February 2015 (CST) |
||
What was your take on the Priests Arnak again, Xorus? [[User:FIREPHOENIX|FIREPHOENIX]] ([[User talk:FIREPHOENIX|talk]]) 01:58, 2 July 2016 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 00:58, 2 July 2016
Great work! I saw you did the flow storms page, do you have any info on flow patterns? (See Planar Shift (740).) VANKRASN39 (talk) 23:48, 4 February 2015 (CST)
- Thank you :) I'm afraid not, or at least, nothing modern. There is very old lore on the "flows of essence", describing them as like rivers in a radiation field. There was a map of the (old) continent from 1989 that had "greater" and "lesser" flows on it. I would think you'd use those for pinning down your region, then using "local" or "minor" rivulets or nodes to specify a more precise spot. If the flows had stable branchings over time, it would make sense to call that a unique flow pattern. I'm always reluctant with "magical physics" because I'm never sure what is still true. (e.g. Familiars used to be extra-planar entities taking the form of small animals, and still are in DragonRealms, but is that still true? I would guess wyrdlings re-established it.) INIQUITY (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2015 (CST)
What was your take on the Priests Arnak again, Xorus? FIREPHOENIX (talk) 01:58, 2 July 2016 (CDT)