Category talk:Historical Figures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (sorting idea) |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A little tedious, but only 91 pages. What do people think about sorting the historical figures by race or culture? This would be done on the individual pages in the category code. Faendryl for example would be <nowiki>[[Category: Historical Figures|F]]</nowiki> and Illistim would be <nowiki>[[Category: Historical Figures|I]]</nowiki>. G for giant, V for Vaalor, D for dwarfs, H for halfling, T for humans (Turamzzyrian), N for gnome (maybe?). Chart would be posted on the category page. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 15:20, 12 June 2015 (CDT) |
A little tedious, but only 91 pages. What do people think about sorting the historical figures by race or culture? This would be done on the individual pages in the category code. Faendryl for example would be <nowiki>[[Category: Historical Figures|F]]</nowiki> and Illistim would be <nowiki>[[Category: Historical Figures|I]]</nowiki>. G for giant, V for Vaalor, D for dwarfs, H for halfling, T for humans (Turamzzyrian), N for gnome (maybe?). Chart would be posted on the category page. ICE age figures should have their own letter I think. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 15:20, 12 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
:I can see a good case for making an organized list with sections and linking it from (or putting it on) the category page. It would be easier than fixing every single article, probably more intuitive to read, and allows for putting more information by the link than just the name of the article. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 15:52, 12 June 2015 (CDT) |
|||
::I like that idea, too. Even better. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 15:56, 12 June 2015 (CDT) |
|||
:::can I make it a chart? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 08:34, 16 June 2015 (CDT) |
|||
::::Making it look nicer is good, so long as it's still easy to maintain. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 15:19, 16 June 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:19, 16 June 2015
A little tedious, but only 91 pages. What do people think about sorting the historical figures by race or culture? This would be done on the individual pages in the category code. Faendryl for example would be [[Category: Historical Figures|F]] and Illistim would be [[Category: Historical Figures|I]]. G for giant, V for Vaalor, D for dwarfs, H for halfling, T for humans (Turamzzyrian), N for gnome (maybe?). Chart would be posted on the category page. ICE age figures should have their own letter I think. VANKRASN39 (talk) 15:20, 12 June 2015 (CDT)
- I can see a good case for making an organized list with sections and linking it from (or putting it on) the category page. It would be easier than fixing every single article, probably more intuitive to read, and allows for putting more information by the link than just the name of the article. ZHOUY1 (talk) 15:52, 12 June 2015 (CDT)
- I like that idea, too. Even better. VANKRASN39 (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2015 (CDT)
- can I make it a chart? VANKRASN39 (talk) 08:34, 16 June 2015 (CDT)
- I like that idea, too. Even better. VANKRASN39 (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2015 (CDT)