Template talk:Mono: Difference between revisions

The official GemStone IV encyclopedia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Q)
 
(response, a little venting)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Would there be an addon/wiki upgrade that would take the need out of having to go replace every instance of TT with this template? I have not noticed on any device TT not working and have no plans to stop using it until it is shown to me where it is broken. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 16:28, 29 September 2015 (CDT)
Would there be an addon/wiki upgrade that would take the need out of having to go replace every instance of TT with this template? I have not noticed on any device TT not working and have no plans to stop using it until it is shown to me where it is broken. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 16:28, 29 September 2015 (CDT)
:I think most browsers will support HTML4 for the foreseeable future so this isn't a high priority. As far as "should we use HTML5" that's not a question I'm qualified to comment on, but maybe someone else has an informed opinion. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 15:02, 30 September 2015 (CDT)
::I think with issues like this (keeping up with html standards) we really need access to set up site robots to do all the changes as needed, or a staff member willing to do it. Unfortunately, any request made in the past 9 months to expand access or capability of the site has gone ignored. It's very frustrating and not much different from the conditions we had before the transfer, only now instead of one person who had nothing to do with GS anymore being in charge, we have an entire company we're paying money to and doing free work for actively ignoring our requests. Hopefully this will change, and soon. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 15:38, 30 September 2015 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 14:38, 30 September 2015

Would there be an addon/wiki upgrade that would take the need out of having to go replace every instance of TT with this template? I have not noticed on any device TT not working and have no plans to stop using it until it is shown to me where it is broken. VANKRASN39 (talk) 16:28, 29 September 2015 (CDT)

I think most browsers will support HTML4 for the foreseeable future so this isn't a high priority. As far as "should we use HTML5" that's not a question I'm qualified to comment on, but maybe someone else has an informed opinion. ZHOUY1 (talk) 15:02, 30 September 2015 (CDT)
I think with issues like this (keeping up with html standards) we really need access to set up site robots to do all the changes as needed, or a staff member willing to do it. Unfortunately, any request made in the past 9 months to expand access or capability of the site has gone ignored. It's very frustrating and not much different from the conditions we had before the transfer, only now instead of one person who had nothing to do with GS anymore being in charge, we have an entire company we're paying money to and doing free work for actively ignoring our requests. Hopefully this will change, and soon. VANKRASN39 (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2015 (CDT)