Talk:Hybrid profession: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "It's weird that we have mangled these terms so much that we now have "hybrid" spanning all the other categories. I'm not sure what can be done about it, the Magic Guide is sel...") |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) m (Q) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's weird that we have mangled these terms so much that we now have "hybrid" spanning all the other categories. I'm not sure what can be done about it, the Magic Guide is self-contradictory. ''(e.g. parts of it were written when hybrids were distinct from pures and semis, and one line says hybrids are able to learn major spell circles)'' [[User:INIQUITY|INIQUITY]] ([[User talk:INIQUITY|talk]]) 06:34, 17 June 2015 (CDT) |
It's weird that we have mangled these terms so much that we now have "hybrid" spanning all the other categories. I'm not sure what can be done about it, the Magic Guide is self-contradictory. ''(e.g. parts of it were written when hybrids were distinct from pures and semis, and one line says hybrids are able to learn major spell circles)'' [[User:INIQUITY|INIQUITY]] ([[User talk:INIQUITY|talk]]) 06:34, 17 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
:Which magic guide? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 10:09, 17 June 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 09:09, 17 June 2015
It's weird that we have mangled these terms so much that we now have "hybrid" spanning all the other categories. I'm not sure what can be done about it, the Magic Guide is self-contradictory. (e.g. parts of it were written when hybrids were distinct from pures and semis, and one line says hybrids are able to learn major spell circles) INIQUITY (talk) 06:34, 17 June 2015 (CDT)
- Which magic guide? VANKRASN39 (talk) 10:09, 17 June 2015 (CDT)