Talk:Hybrid profession: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) m (Q) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's weird that we have mangled these terms so much that we now have "hybrid" spanning all the other categories. I'm not sure what can be done about it, the Magic Guide is self-contradictory. ''(e.g. parts of it were written when hybrids were distinct from pures and semis, and one line says hybrids are able to learn major spell circles)'' [[User:INIQUITY|INIQUITY]] ([[User talk:INIQUITY|talk]]) 06:34, 17 June 2015 (CDT) |
It's weird that we have mangled these terms so much that we now have "hybrid" spanning all the other categories. I'm not sure what can be done about it, the Magic Guide is self-contradictory. ''(e.g. parts of it were written when hybrids were distinct from pures and semis, and one line says hybrids are able to learn major spell circles)'' [[User:INIQUITY|INIQUITY]] ([[User talk:INIQUITY|talk]]) 06:34, 17 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
:Which magic guide? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 10:09, 17 June 2015 (CDT) |
:Which magic guide? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 10:09, 17 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
:Sorry. The official [http://www.play.net/gs4/info/magic-guide.asp "magic guide"] on Play.net in the references section. For example: ''"Major Spell circles are the deepest and most powerful concepts common to each sphere of magic, and may be mastered only by pure or hybrid users from their respective spheres."'' It is a very old mistake, from a twenty-something year old book. It's just odd to me having "pure hybrids" and (especially) "non-spell user hybrids." Apparently, we use "pure" to mean "purely spell casters" now, while the original meaning of "spell caster of purely one sphere of magic" is what is used in the document. [[User:INIQUITY|INIQUITY]] ([[User talk:INIQUITY|talk]]) 03:49, 18 June 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 02:49, 18 June 2015
It's weird that we have mangled these terms so much that we now have "hybrid" spanning all the other categories. I'm not sure what can be done about it, the Magic Guide is self-contradictory. (e.g. parts of it were written when hybrids were distinct from pures and semis, and one line says hybrids are able to learn major spell circles) INIQUITY (talk) 06:34, 17 June 2015 (CDT)
- Which magic guide? VANKRASN39 (talk) 10:09, 17 June 2015 (CDT)
- Sorry. The official "magic guide" on Play.net in the references section. For example: "Major Spell circles are the deepest and most powerful concepts common to each sphere of magic, and may be mastered only by pure or hybrid users from their respective spheres." It is a very old mistake, from a twenty-something year old book. It's just odd to me having "pure hybrids" and (especially) "non-spell user hybrids." Apparently, we use "pure" to mean "purely spell casters" now, while the original meaning of "spell caster of purely one sphere of magic" is what is used in the document. INIQUITY (talk) 03:49, 18 June 2015 (CDT)