Talk:Storyline timeline: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(storyline subcategories by year) |
FIREPHOENIX (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I like the look of this, but what about Category:Storylines [[User:FIREPHOENIX|FIREPHOENIX]] ([[User talk:FIREPHOENIX|talk]]) 21:14, 13 February 2017 (CST) |
I like the look of this, but what about Category:Storylines [[User:FIREPHOENIX|FIREPHOENIX]] ([[User talk:FIREPHOENIX|talk]]) 21:14, 13 February 2017 (CST) |
||
:We can add storyline subcategories like "Storylines in 2017". For the naming convention, would real years (2017) or Elanthian years (5117) be preferable? [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 13:29, 15 February 2017 (CST) |
:We can add storyline subcategories like "Storylines in 2017". For the naming convention, would real years (2017) or Elanthian years (5117) be preferable? [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 13:29, 15 February 2017 (CST) |
||
:OOC document. I think it's safe to do years in real time as to avoid having an explanation for game years. [[User:FIREPHOENIX|FIREPHOENIX]] ([[User talk:FIREPHOENIX|talk]]) 21:46, 15 February 2017 (CST) |
Revision as of 21:46, 15 February 2017
I like the look of this, but what about Category:Storylines FIREPHOENIX (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2017 (CST)
- We can add storyline subcategories like "Storylines in 2017". For the naming convention, would real years (2017) or Elanthian years (5117) be preferable? ZHOUY1 (talk) 13:29, 15 February 2017 (CST)
- OOC document. I think it's safe to do years in real time as to avoid having an explanation for game years. FIREPHOENIX (talk) 21:46, 15 February 2017 (CST)