Talk:Blood Burst (701): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: My personal inclination would be to have zero examples unless its a really complicated formula or an involved process to uncover the factors. In those cases I think *an* example may be appropriate. In this particular article its fairly straightforward, I dont think any examples are required, though I would like to hear the thoughts of others on the topic. [[User:ULTHRIPE|ULTHRIPE]] 00:50, 12 January 2006 (CST) |
:: My personal inclination would be to have zero examples unless its a really complicated formula or an involved process to uncover the factors. In those cases I think *an* example may be appropriate. In this particular article its fairly straightforward, I dont think any examples are required, though I would like to hear the thoughts of others on the topic. [[User:ULTHRIPE|ULTHRIPE]] 00:50, 12 January 2006 (CST) |
||
::: That seems pretty reasonable to me. [[User:Ildran|Ildran]] 01:06, 12 January 2006 (CST) |
|||
Revision as of 01:06, 12 January 2006
Sysops: What is the apporpriate amount of examples? It would seem to me that 2 examples per formula is excessive. Mekthros: Go make your user page! ULTHRIPE 00:31, 12 January 2006 (CST)
- Enough that it's clear but not so many that it's overwhelming. 2 per formula might be considered too many, but not necessarily. It's a wiki, discuss it with anyone who's interested and let us know what you come up with :) Ildran 00:44, 12 January 2006 (CST)
- My personal inclination would be to have zero examples unless its a really complicated formula or an involved process to uncover the factors. In those cases I think *an* example may be appropriate. In this particular article its fairly straightforward, I dont think any examples are required, though I would like to hear the thoughts of others on the topic. ULTHRIPE 00:50, 12 January 2006 (CST)
- That seems pretty reasonable to me. Ildran 01:06, 12 January 2006 (CST)