Talk:Instrument learning: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Eliminating Icewhite's signature from the bottom of the document. Credit is given to authors of articles in the [http://www.krakiipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instrument_learning&action=history history] of the page. |
*Eliminating Icewhite's signature from the bottom of the document. Credit is given to authors of articles in the [http://www.krakiipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instrument_learning&action=history history] of the page. |
||
Or! We could simply move the document to [[Instrument learning guide]] and, being labeled as a guide, the format would depend completely on the creator of the guide. -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 20:09, 21 October 2006 (EDT) |
Or! We could simply move the document to [[Instrument learning guide]] and, being labeled as a guide, the format would depend completely on the creator of the guide. -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 20:09, 21 October 2006 (EDT) |
||
::I think we could do both. Have the technical information remain in the article, then move the "advice" and "experience" information to the guide.[[User:REBELAT|Rail]] 22:23, 21 October 2006 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 20:23, 21 October 2006
Cleanup!
No offense, Icewhite, but I don't feel that these articles meet the quality standards of Krakiipedia. These are the changes I propose:
- Eliminating the personal comments on your character's progress.
- Converting the preformatted stuff to MediaWiki format.
- "Wikifying" the document by adding links to the various verbs used, among other things.
- Eliminating Icewhite's signature from the bottom of the document. Credit is given to authors of articles in the history of the page.
Or! We could simply move the document to Instrument learning guide and, being labeled as a guide, the format would depend completely on the creator of the guide. -Andy talk 20:09, 21 October 2006 (EDT)
- I think we could do both. Have the technical information remain in the article, then move the "advice" and "experience" information to the guide.Rail 22:23, 21 October 2006 (EDT)