Talk:Martial Prowess (1705): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (I believe this should be categorized as an offensive, not defensive booster) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think more people use it for offense. Since there are so much fewer offensive boosters, I don't want it to get lost as an offensive boost option. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 09:29, 22 July 2015 (CDT) |
I think more people use it for offense. Since there are so much fewer offensive boosters, I don't want it to get lost as an offensive boost option. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 09:29, 22 July 2015 (CDT) |
||
:That makes sense. Ideally, [[:Template:Spell]] should be changed to take hybrid offense/defense enhancements, which would also fix the few cases where the older spellbox templates are still used. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 13:18, 22 July 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 12:18, 22 July 2015
I think more people use it for offense. Since there are so much fewer offensive boosters, I don't want it to get lost as an offensive boost option. VANKRASN39 (talk) 09:29, 22 July 2015 (CDT)
- That makes sense. Ideally, Template:Spell should be changed to take hybrid offense/defense enhancements, which would also fix the few cases where the older spellbox templates are still used. ZHOUY1 (talk) 13:18, 22 July 2015 (CDT)