Talk:Weapon: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (suggestion for unarmed combat section, background) |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Suggest putting an Unarmed Combat section with handwrap/footwraps, gloves/boots, as well as a UAC compatible section with: cestus, knuckle-blade, knuckle-duster, paingrip, razorpaw, tiger-claw, yierka-spur, if you weren't heading in the direction already. One of our discussions in the move was about having to use the ugly old background colors, and it was said that other, less painful colors were fine :) [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2016 (CDT) |
Suggest putting an Unarmed Combat section with handwrap/footwraps, gloves/boots, as well as a UAC compatible section with: cestus, knuckle-blade, knuckle-duster, paingrip, razorpaw, tiger-claw, yierka-spur, if you weren't heading in the direction already. One of our discussions in the move was about having to use the ugly old background colors, and it was said that other, less painful colors (and white) were fine :) [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2016 (CDT) |
||
Revision as of 14:57, 7 September 2016
Suggest putting an Unarmed Combat section with handwrap/footwraps, gloves/boots, as well as a UAC compatible section with: cestus, knuckle-blade, knuckle-duster, paingrip, razorpaw, tiger-claw, yierka-spur, if you weren't heading in the direction already. One of our discussions in the move was about having to use the ugly old background colors, and it was said that other, less painful colors (and white) were fine :) VANKRASN39 (talk) 14:57, 7 September 2016 (CDT)