Template talk:Gem table entry: Difference between revisions

The official GemStone IV encyclopedia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
(broken template)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Something in this template is adding the [[List of gems]] page to the [[:Category:Pages_using_duplicate_arguments_in_template_calls]] (pls don't create that page). It may be as simple as changing the 1 parameter to anything else. I've resolved all other pages that were showing up there after the version upgrade, but I'm not quite sure what to do with this one. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 15:44, 15 September 2016 (CDT)
Something in this template is adding the [[List of gems]] page to the [[:Category:Pages_using_duplicate_arguments_in_template_calls]] (pls don't create that page). It may be as simple as changing the 1 parameter to anything else. I've resolved all other pages that were showing up there after the version upgrade, but I'm not quite sure what to do with this one. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 15:44, 15 September 2016 (CDT)
:I think this might be because the template takes 4 locational parameters but some of the table entries skip a parameter from the way rowspans are set up for gems sharing the same noun. Will try to rethink the design. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 22:54, 15 September 2016 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 22:54, 15 September 2016

Something in this template is adding the List of gems page to the Category:Pages_using_duplicate_arguments_in_template_calls (pls don't create that page). It may be as simple as changing the 1 parameter to anything else. I've resolved all other pages that were showing up there after the version upgrade, but I'm not quite sure what to do with this one. VANKRASN39 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2016 (CDT)

I think this might be because the template takes 4 locational parameters but some of the table entries skip a parameter from the way rowspans are set up for gems sharing the same noun. Will try to rethink the design. ZHOUY1 (talk) 22:54, 15 September 2016 (CDT)