Template talk:Padding weighting table: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::From [[Help:Style]]: "As GSWiki is considered official documentation and the place where all players new and old are sent to read up on any topic, grammar, style, and formatting should be considered carefully in editing so that the site as a whole will be as professional-looking as possible." You are not to change official documentation provided by GMs. Your chart did just that, and you removed the ranges. Your verbal harassment via LNET private chats, which has been sent to staff, is not appreciated. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 21:57, 27 August 2017 (CDT) |
::From [[Help:Style]]: "As GSWiki is considered official documentation and the place where all players new and old are sent to read up on any topic, grammar, style, and formatting should be considered carefully in editing so that the site as a whole will be as professional-looking as possible." You are not to change official documentation provided by GMs. Your chart did just that, and you removed the ranges. Your verbal harassment via LNET private chats, which has been sent to staff, is not appreciated. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 21:57, 27 August 2017 (CDT) |
||
:::I took into consideration proper formatting and kept it similar to what existed before. There is nothing in what you link that says we cannot update mechanics information provided by GMs with new, more up-to-date information provided by GMs. You just didn't want me to change anything until YOU had all your questions answered. As such you removed relevant information from the Wiki because you're on a power trip. I'm glad you forwarded my comments on you to staff, it's not like I haven't told several of them exactly what I think of you. I have also presented a complain to feedback about your continued tyranny.[[User:Kithus|Kithus]] ([[User talk:Kithus|talk]]) 4:04, 28 August 2017 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 13:51, 28 August 2017
I rolled this back due to the changes made to official information provided by Wyrom at the bottom. I have asked follow-up questions on the officials, please wait for the responses. VANKRASN39 (talk) 05:39, 27 August 2017 (CDT)
I rolled back your rollback because there was no reason for it. Please do not remove edits I worked hard on because you are waiting for questions to be answered. If new information provides further insight then make the changes then. Kithus (talk) 10:13, 27 August 2017 (EST)
- I'm sorry, but you changed information that was official. That is not permitted and I will report it. VANKRASN39 (talk) 21:26, 27 August 2017 (CDT)
- Please cite the exact rule that states players cannot update relevant information on the wiki without your permission. Kithus (talk) 10:13, 27 August 2017 (EST)
- From Help:Style: "As GSWiki is considered official documentation and the place where all players new and old are sent to read up on any topic, grammar, style, and formatting should be considered carefully in editing so that the site as a whole will be as professional-looking as possible." You are not to change official documentation provided by GMs. Your chart did just that, and you removed the ranges. Your verbal harassment via LNET private chats, which has been sent to staff, is not appreciated. VANKRASN39 (talk) 21:57, 27 August 2017 (CDT)
- I took into consideration proper formatting and kept it similar to what existed before. There is nothing in what you link that says we cannot update mechanics information provided by GMs with new, more up-to-date information provided by GMs. You just didn't want me to change anything until YOU had all your questions answered. As such you removed relevant information from the Wiki because you're on a power trip. I'm glad you forwarded my comments on you to staff, it's not like I haven't told several of them exactly what I think of you. I have also presented a complain to feedback about your continued tyranny.Kithus (talk) 4:04, 28 August 2017 (EST)